23:1223:12, 7 September 2021diffhist+603
Ebi
98.113.137.113 (
talk)
Manual Reversion. Tedentious editing, POV pushing, abuse of process (editing as if admin and conclusions have been reached on false accusations), and bad faith accusations without merit. This is an IP subnet from lower Manhattan, of millions of people, that FIOS auto-assigns. There is zero reason to exclude these good faith edits by the others.Tag: Manual revert
19:2519:25, 7 September 2021diffhist+680
Ebi
98.113.137.113 (
talk)
Don't see valid dispute to revert the added article and facts. The article and reference added is from the same author the disputing editors otherwise accept as a valid source. Please go to talk page prior to reversion or will be escalated for POV pushing.Tags: Manual revertReverted
19:1419:14, 6 September 2021diffhist−6
Ebi
98.113.137.35 (
talk)
Fixed formatting and re-did header with OBJECTIVELY WELL CITED REFERENCE that is being removed to POV push by the IranHistoryForum. This editor is consistently engaged in similar POV pushing controversies and will clean articles of any well-linked sources claiming nonsense about why they're invalid.Tags: RevertedVisual edit
19:1319:13, 6 September 2021diffhist+428
Ebi
98.113.137.35 (
talk)
Undid revision 1042783789 by
HistoryofIran (
talk) POV pushing is what you are doing. The added reference is sourced to Middle East Eye, a well reputed US source and venue. You just don't like what it says and that is clear. Let's see if WikiPedia admins are as easily manipulated as you manipulate these articles. Go ahead and escalate.Tags: UndoReverted
19:0519:05, 6 September 2021diffhist+415
Ebi
98.113.137.35 (
talk)
Re-added the prior accurate header with well-sourced negative remarks about BLP. This article should not be polished to serve as PR.Tag: Reverted
19:0119:01, 6 September 2021diffhist+13
Ebi
98.113.137.35 (
talk)
This BLP has been moderated to remove any objectively sourced negative information newsworthy and relevant to the BLP several times. There is no valid excuse to eliminate well-sourced negative data on BLPs. Dispute tag added.Tag: Reverted
19:0019:00, 6 September 2021diffhist−556
Kathleen M. Boozang
98.113.137.35 (
talk)
→Works, honors and recognition: This article's editors had a bad habit of listing accomplishments and biographical achievements in detail without actually being cited accurately or the citations referenced actually detailing out those things as well. The link is to a Top Women in Law 2018 page on the NJ Law Journal without any specific reference to Boozang's individual achievements. However, info from source valid has been left.
18:5718:57, 6 September 2021diffhist−424
Kathleen M. Boozang
98.113.137.35 (
talk)
The information cited to source 1 in the header of this BLP that has been removed did not appear in the article linked. The article does not go into all of her history prior to becoming dean and the various accomplishments specifically cited. Though they may be true achievements, we will need an accurate and reliable source to add them. The summarization of the source, in other words, was inaccurate.
18:5018:50, 6 September 2021diffhist+15
Maryam Rajavi
98.113.137.35 (
talk)
Added dispute tag as to the accuracy of this article and its sources. All throughout, there is citation to broken links, references to self-published articles, and a wholesale deletion/circumvention of any objectively researchable facts about the BLP that may be negative despite being well authenticated.Tag: Reverted
18:3818:38, 6 September 2021diffhist−24
Maryam Rajavi
98.113.137.35 (
talk)
Rajavi is not a descendant of the Qajar dynasty and merely making claims to such is insufficient and part of the MEK cult mythology. At best, her ancestors were royal servants in the Qajar household.Tag: Reverted
18:3618:36, 6 September 2021diffhist+304
Kaveh L. Afrasiabi
98.113.137.35 (
talk)
The press statement by the FBI referenced several times was not summarized in a way that lends to an objective impression of it. The FBI expressly stated in its Justice.gov publication re: the matter that BLP subject is not to be considered guilty until convicted because the mere existence of a charge leads to public misinterpretation. In line with this reasoning, it should be expressly re-stated here in summary of the document.Tags: Revertedpossible unreferenced addition to BLP
23:1223:12, 7 September 2021diffhist+603
Ebi
98.113.137.113 (
talk)
Manual Reversion. Tedentious editing, POV pushing, abuse of process (editing as if admin and conclusions have been reached on false accusations), and bad faith accusations without merit. This is an IP subnet from lower Manhattan, of millions of people, that FIOS auto-assigns. There is zero reason to exclude these good faith edits by the others.Tag: Manual revert
19:2519:25, 7 September 2021diffhist+680
Ebi
98.113.137.113 (
talk)
Don't see valid dispute to revert the added article and facts. The article and reference added is from the same author the disputing editors otherwise accept as a valid source. Please go to talk page prior to reversion or will be escalated for POV pushing.Tags: Manual revertReverted
19:1419:14, 6 September 2021diffhist−6
Ebi
98.113.137.35 (
talk)
Fixed formatting and re-did header with OBJECTIVELY WELL CITED REFERENCE that is being removed to POV push by the IranHistoryForum. This editor is consistently engaged in similar POV pushing controversies and will clean articles of any well-linked sources claiming nonsense about why they're invalid.Tags: RevertedVisual edit
19:1319:13, 6 September 2021diffhist+428
Ebi
98.113.137.35 (
talk)
Undid revision 1042783789 by
HistoryofIran (
talk) POV pushing is what you are doing. The added reference is sourced to Middle East Eye, a well reputed US source and venue. You just don't like what it says and that is clear. Let's see if WikiPedia admins are as easily manipulated as you manipulate these articles. Go ahead and escalate.Tags: UndoReverted
19:0519:05, 6 September 2021diffhist+415
Ebi
98.113.137.35 (
talk)
Re-added the prior accurate header with well-sourced negative remarks about BLP. This article should not be polished to serve as PR.Tag: Reverted
19:0119:01, 6 September 2021diffhist+13
Ebi
98.113.137.35 (
talk)
This BLP has been moderated to remove any objectively sourced negative information newsworthy and relevant to the BLP several times. There is no valid excuse to eliminate well-sourced negative data on BLPs. Dispute tag added.Tag: Reverted
19:0019:00, 6 September 2021diffhist−556
Kathleen M. Boozang
98.113.137.35 (
talk)
→Works, honors and recognition: This article's editors had a bad habit of listing accomplishments and biographical achievements in detail without actually being cited accurately or the citations referenced actually detailing out those things as well. The link is to a Top Women in Law 2018 page on the NJ Law Journal without any specific reference to Boozang's individual achievements. However, info from source valid has been left.
18:5718:57, 6 September 2021diffhist−424
Kathleen M. Boozang
98.113.137.35 (
talk)
The information cited to source 1 in the header of this BLP that has been removed did not appear in the article linked. The article does not go into all of her history prior to becoming dean and the various accomplishments specifically cited. Though they may be true achievements, we will need an accurate and reliable source to add them. The summarization of the source, in other words, was inaccurate.
18:5018:50, 6 September 2021diffhist+15
Maryam Rajavi
98.113.137.35 (
talk)
Added dispute tag as to the accuracy of this article and its sources. All throughout, there is citation to broken links, references to self-published articles, and a wholesale deletion/circumvention of any objectively researchable facts about the BLP that may be negative despite being well authenticated.Tag: Reverted
18:3818:38, 6 September 2021diffhist−24
Maryam Rajavi
98.113.137.35 (
talk)
Rajavi is not a descendant of the Qajar dynasty and merely making claims to such is insufficient and part of the MEK cult mythology. At best, her ancestors were royal servants in the Qajar household.Tag: Reverted
18:3618:36, 6 September 2021diffhist+304
Kaveh L. Afrasiabi
98.113.137.35 (
talk)
The press statement by the FBI referenced several times was not summarized in a way that lends to an objective impression of it. The FBI expressly stated in its Justice.gov publication re: the matter that BLP subject is not to be considered guilty until convicted because the mere existence of a charge leads to public misinterpretation. In line with this reasoning, it should be expressly re-stated here in summary of the document.Tags: Revertedpossible unreferenced addition to BLP