22:5422:54, 29 April 2024diffhist−137
Azerbaijani calendar beliefs
1) Not an ethnonym back then, let alone a country. 2) If this is still based on Vasary 2016, then its Turkic-Mongol names, not "Turkish" names. As usual, Abutalub has mixed their own POV with sources
22:5222:52, 29 April 2024diffhist−1,736
Azerbaijani calendar beliefs
More nonsense by Abutalub. Azeris were not an ethnonym back then per
WP:RS, they already know this https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/User_talk:Abutalub#Turkman_style Historical revisionism will not be tolerated here /info/en/?search=User:HistoryofIran/Sources#Historical_negationism/revisionism
22:4922:49, 29 April 2024diffhist−110
Azerbaijani calendar beliefs
1) Not what the source says. 2) Has nothing to do with Azeris. 3) Once again the disruptive
WP:NOTHERE user Abutalub has claimed "Turkic(-Mongolian)" stuff as "Azerbaijani". It cant be right that this happens every few months, they should get indeffed at the Azeri wiki too.
22:4722:47, 29 April 2024diffhist−20
Azerbaijani calendar beliefs
Yet another article created by the indeffed pov pushing user Abutalub (who is notorious for misusing citations and using non-
WP:RS) which has got translated into the English wiki. Interesting. Azeris were not an ethnonym in the 18th-century, Azeri sources are also not
WP:RS /info/en/?search=User:HistoryofIran/Sources
18:1418:14, 29 April 2024diffhist+27
Hazaras
Rv, sigh. It is still not Babur who says that bit about the Mongol invasion, its the authors translating his book. Perhaps you should read the citations before you start changing informationTags: UndoMobile editMobile web editAdvanced mobile edit
12:3112:31, 29 April 2024diffhist−12
Hazaras
rv, once again trying to reduce the Mongol aspect of the Hazara. Read the source - it is not Babur who says this, but the authors translating itTag: Undo
22:0722:07, 28 April 2024diffhist−899
Cyaxares
rv, some questionable sources and pretty wild (outdated?) claims. Ruled todays Afghanistan, Pakistan, Uzbekistan, Tajikistan, Turkmenistan..? The Medes are not even considered to be an empire by scholarship anymore (see
Medes), so thats not possible.currentTag: Undo
22:5422:54, 29 April 2024diffhist−137
Azerbaijani calendar beliefs
1) Not an ethnonym back then, let alone a country. 2) If this is still based on Vasary 2016, then its Turkic-Mongol names, not "Turkish" names. As usual, Abutalub has mixed their own POV with sources
22:5222:52, 29 April 2024diffhist−1,736
Azerbaijani calendar beliefs
More nonsense by Abutalub. Azeris were not an ethnonym back then per
WP:RS, they already know this https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/User_talk:Abutalub#Turkman_style Historical revisionism will not be tolerated here /info/en/?search=User:HistoryofIran/Sources#Historical_negationism/revisionism
22:4922:49, 29 April 2024diffhist−110
Azerbaijani calendar beliefs
1) Not what the source says. 2) Has nothing to do with Azeris. 3) Once again the disruptive
WP:NOTHERE user Abutalub has claimed "Turkic(-Mongolian)" stuff as "Azerbaijani". It cant be right that this happens every few months, they should get indeffed at the Azeri wiki too.
22:4722:47, 29 April 2024diffhist−20
Azerbaijani calendar beliefs
Yet another article created by the indeffed pov pushing user Abutalub (who is notorious for misusing citations and using non-
WP:RS) which has got translated into the English wiki. Interesting. Azeris were not an ethnonym in the 18th-century, Azeri sources are also not
WP:RS /info/en/?search=User:HistoryofIran/Sources
18:1418:14, 29 April 2024diffhist+27
Hazaras
Rv, sigh. It is still not Babur who says that bit about the Mongol invasion, its the authors translating his book. Perhaps you should read the citations before you start changing informationTags: UndoMobile editMobile web editAdvanced mobile edit
12:3112:31, 29 April 2024diffhist−12
Hazaras
rv, once again trying to reduce the Mongol aspect of the Hazara. Read the source - it is not Babur who says this, but the authors translating itTag: Undo
22:0722:07, 28 April 2024diffhist−899
Cyaxares
rv, some questionable sources and pretty wild (outdated?) claims. Ruled todays Afghanistan, Pakistan, Uzbekistan, Tajikistan, Turkmenistan..? The Medes are not even considered to be an empire by scholarship anymore (see
Medes), so thats not possible.currentTag: Undo