23:1223:12, 7 September 2021diffhist+603
Ebi
98.113.137.113 (
talk)
Manual Reversion. Tedentious editing, POV pushing, abuse of process (editing as if admin and conclusions have been reached on false accusations), and bad faith accusations without merit. This is an IP subnet from lower Manhattan, of millions of people, that FIOS auto-assigns. There is zero reason to exclude these good faith edits by the others.Tag: Manual revert
19:2519:25, 7 September 2021diffhist+680
Ebi
98.113.137.113 (
talk)
Don't see valid dispute to revert the added article and facts. The article and reference added is from the same author the disputing editors otherwise accept as a valid source. Please go to talk page prior to reversion or will be escalated for POV pushing.Tags: Manual revertReverted
19:1419:14, 6 September 2021diffhist−6
Ebi
98.113.137.35 (
talk)
Fixed formatting and re-did header with OBJECTIVELY WELL CITED REFERENCE that is being removed to POV push by the IranHistoryForum. This editor is consistently engaged in similar POV pushing controversies and will clean articles of any well-linked sources claiming nonsense about why they're invalid.Tags: RevertedVisual edit
19:1319:13, 6 September 2021diffhist+428
Ebi
98.113.137.35 (
talk)
Undid revision 1042783789 by
HistoryofIran (
talk) POV pushing is what you are doing. The added reference is sourced to Middle East Eye, a well reputed US source and venue. You just don't like what it says and that is clear. Let's see if WikiPedia admins are as easily manipulated as you manipulate these articles. Go ahead and escalate.Tags: UndoReverted
19:0519:05, 6 September 2021diffhist+415
Ebi
98.113.137.35 (
talk)
Re-added the prior accurate header with well-sourced negative remarks about BLP. This article should not be polished to serve as PR.Tag: Reverted
19:0119:01, 6 September 2021diffhist+13
Ebi
98.113.137.35 (
talk)
This BLP has been moderated to remove any objectively sourced negative information newsworthy and relevant to the BLP several times. There is no valid excuse to eliminate well-sourced negative data on BLPs. Dispute tag added.Tag: Reverted
23:1223:12, 7 September 2021diffhist+603
Ebi
98.113.137.113 (
talk)
Manual Reversion. Tedentious editing, POV pushing, abuse of process (editing as if admin and conclusions have been reached on false accusations), and bad faith accusations without merit. This is an IP subnet from lower Manhattan, of millions of people, that FIOS auto-assigns. There is zero reason to exclude these good faith edits by the others.Tag: Manual revert
19:2519:25, 7 September 2021diffhist+680
Ebi
98.113.137.113 (
talk)
Don't see valid dispute to revert the added article and facts. The article and reference added is from the same author the disputing editors otherwise accept as a valid source. Please go to talk page prior to reversion or will be escalated for POV pushing.Tags: Manual revertReverted
19:1419:14, 6 September 2021diffhist−6
Ebi
98.113.137.35 (
talk)
Fixed formatting and re-did header with OBJECTIVELY WELL CITED REFERENCE that is being removed to POV push by the IranHistoryForum. This editor is consistently engaged in similar POV pushing controversies and will clean articles of any well-linked sources claiming nonsense about why they're invalid.Tags: RevertedVisual edit
19:1319:13, 6 September 2021diffhist+428
Ebi
98.113.137.35 (
talk)
Undid revision 1042783789 by
HistoryofIran (
talk) POV pushing is what you are doing. The added reference is sourced to Middle East Eye, a well reputed US source and venue. You just don't like what it says and that is clear. Let's see if WikiPedia admins are as easily manipulated as you manipulate these articles. Go ahead and escalate.Tags: UndoReverted
19:0519:05, 6 September 2021diffhist+415
Ebi
98.113.137.35 (
talk)
Re-added the prior accurate header with well-sourced negative remarks about BLP. This article should not be polished to serve as PR.Tag: Reverted
19:0119:01, 6 September 2021diffhist+13
Ebi
98.113.137.35 (
talk)
This BLP has been moderated to remove any objectively sourced negative information newsworthy and relevant to the BLP several times. There is no valid excuse to eliminate well-sourced negative data on BLPs. Dispute tag added.Tag: Reverted