http://i50.tinypic.com/vonddz.jpg —Preceding unsigned comment added by Psyconall ( talk • contribs) 17:36, 5 February 2010 (UTC)
i think it might be nice to have some links to the copyright laws. especially the famous page at cornell that breaks down exactly what is and isnt in the public domain.
ah yes here it is.
http://www.copyright.cornell.edu/public_domain/
Decora ( talk) 01:30, 19 February 2009 (UTC)
See Image talk:Replace this image female.svg#This thing is lame. Punkmorten ( talk) 19:28, 1 January 2008 (UTC)
here you go:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Image:Goldie_2003.jpg (found on the
drum and bass page). —Preceding
unsigned comment added by
62.165.96.134 (
talk) 23:58, 22 March 2008 (UTC)
Among other things (stereotypes, etc), this image looks like the guy had a horrible accident which mutated his head... Why not just use Image:Replace this image1.svg? Skittle ( talk) 11:25, 31 March 2008 (UTC)
I don't like the 'do you own one'. It doesn't matter if someone owns one or not, it's whether they can obtain one in digital form that is free and upload it to Wikipedia. "Can you provide one" would be a lot more sensible. Richard001 ( talk) 01:43, 5 April 2008 (UTC)
A discussion concerning the use of image placeholders has opened at Wikipedia:Centralized discussion/Image placeholders and may be of interest to editors watching this image. The placeholder images have recently been uploaded to 50,000 articles, and while there has been disagreement about the use of these images in various corners, there has not been a centralized discussion on this issue affecting the community. Please contribute your thoughts and publicize this discussion anywhere you feel would be appropriate. Thank you. Northwesterner1 ( talk) 10:36, 12 April 2008 (UTC)
I have contacted Norm Johnson and received his permission to place a photo of him here (one from his personal webpage) I have this documentation (though not a "legal release" in the context of a signed/notarized form) but an email from him stating he would be very happy to have his photo included. Is that enough to post it? If not, as I have means to contact him, what do I need to add this image? Thanks, just want to do this right. —Preceding unsigned comment added by OneHappyHusky ( talk • contribs) 02:19, 14 April 2008 (UTC)
I've made a new version in the meantime:
(I couldn't replace the old image because the page was protected.) I'd be happy to make one for the female if anyone's interested. Tlogmer ( talk / contributions ) 12:16, 24 April 2008 (UTC)
You may publish an image of Slipher from the following homepages: http://www.roe.ac.uk/~jap/slipher/ http://www.lowell.edu/Research/library/paper/vm_slipher_pict.html I am only a registered wikipedia-member in Germany an I don't want pass through the bureaucracy of wikipedia because of the foto (have tried it once in Germany). (rwalle, 29.05.2008) —Preceding unsigned comment added by 84.171.193.219 ( talk) 14:59, 29 May 2008 (UTC)
{{ editprotected}} es:Imagen:Falta imagen hombre.svg Could someone add this?-- Domingo Portales ( talk) 20:39, 13 May 2008 (UTC)
Why not add public domain to the suggestions for how to release your rights to an image you own? To some this may be preferable to the various nonsense "licenses". —Preceding unsigned comment added by 87.112.231.232 ( talk) 21:25, 13 June 2008 (UTC)
I think a mention as to why the placeholder was put there would be appropriate in the image description. Untill I had completely read WP:NFC, I couldn't understand why a non-free picture would not be accepted per fair use policy. Here's the relevant part:
While after reading it I could understand how this fit with fair use, I couldn't really figure it out before. -- Dandin1 ( talk) 01:05, 7 July 2008 (UTC)
To give background, I have been a very vocal opponent of how contrasting the image is (I support lowering the image contrast of the human figure to almost non-visibility). However, I am in a hotel on their computer and the background image of the human in the picture succesfully looks almost opaque and is dramatically lighter in color, but the image has not been modified since many months back when I first started having an issue with it. I am wondering why the image is so different. It suggests to me that Wikipedia users and those in the debate regarding this image are seeing two different images of it. Perhaps the background color is actually not Web Color compatible or compatible to those with older video cards and shows differently to some -- has anyone compared how the image looks with a 16-bit True Color format compared to 32-bit True Color? On my personal computer I use 800 x 600 res and 16-bit True Color -- and the background person is jarringly contrasting (a big gray thing looming in the background) and this contrast is why I am so vocal against the image. With whatever settings the hotel has, though, the image is not bad at all. Anyone have an answer? (Question crosslinked to David Gerard, the most recent image changer). -- Guroadrunner ( talk) 06:19, 9 August 2008 (UTC)
Why isn't this image showing up? It's just showing a blank in the infoboxen; see James Otto for instance. Ten Pound Hammer and his otters • ( Broken clamshells • Otter chirps • HELP) 21:43, 25 August 2008 (UTC)
{{Editprotected}}
I keep encountering this thing in articles; not all editors are aware of the Centralized Discussion that nixed, by WP community-wide consensus, the use of this and similar images on article pages, and some are thus still deploying it. The status of this image as deprecated is very clear and needs to be made clearer (but it should not be deleted; the centralized and pre-centralized debates about it are of great precedential value, but would be rendered rather inexplicable if the image disappeared, as it is used numerous times in the course of the debate).
{{Warning|1=Do not add this image to article pages. The proposal to add such images to articles [[Wikipedia:Centralized discussion/Image placeholders|has been rejected]]. The image is preserved for historical reasons, as it is frequently cited in the proposal debates.}}
These changes should be applied to any and all images in this series. I have so far tagged two of them for this editprotected cleanup.
— SMcCandlish [ talk] [ cont] ‹(-¿-)› 09:23, 17 September 2008 (UTC)
From reading Wikipedia:Centralized discussion/Image placeholders, the status of this image as deprecated is not clear at all. Which discussion was the image actually deprecated in? -- Brilliand ( talk) 19:45, 3 November 2008 (UTC)
Please let us use this image for public purposes and add the syntax: "Hình:Ngoi_sao_nam.svg", too. Thanks a lot. TanPhat Nguyen.
I have a very recent portrait photo of Anger, which I took during his performance with Brian Butler as Technicolor Skull in Copenhagen last saturdag (8th of october 2008), and I'm willing to publish it under a creative commons share alike lince, but I can't seem to upload it since I am not a autoconfirmed member. Does anybody have any help to offer? —Preceding unsigned comment added by Magnuskaslov ( talk • contribs) 17:32, 12 November 2008 (UTC)
This image needs a source and a license.-- Rockfang ( talk) 10:04, 17 December 2008 (UTC)
Aren't all images on the Internet free? I mean, since when do you have to pay to save a picture?-- Xasitchaine ( talk) 21:08, 11 April 2009 (UTC)
{{ editprotected}} Could an admin please add the following text to this image's page:
This image is based on [http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/archive/c/cd/20070323163647%21Male_no_free_image_yet.svg this version] of [[:Commons:Image:Male no free image yet.svg]], produced by [[:Commons:User:Editor at Large]] (En user: [[User:Editor at Large]]) based on the original [[:Commons:Image:Male_no_free_image_yet.png]] produced by [[:Commons:User:Geni]] (En user: [[User:Geni]]). {{PD-because|Original work of User:Geni released into PD, adaptation by User:Editor at Large also released into PD}}
Please see the above section as to why I'm requesting this. I got the above bolded information from a link in the licensing template here.-- Rockfang ( talk) 01:12, 18 December 2008 (UTC)
It should be enough that anyone who owns the copyright to a picture allows it to be put on here - to have to give it up and subscribe to some of wikipedias political notions is amoral and wrong. So drop the bullshit about releasing it under any kind of nonsense license. -- EnBruger ( talk) 23:22, 22 February 2009 (UTC)
Why no one use a picture of him like this: http://www.experienceeldorado.tv/cms/images/stories/perrykingheadshot-newa.jpg —Preceding unsigned comment added by 78.51.235.92 ( talk) 18:49, 21 May 2009 (UTC)
Instead of giving a link to a wp upload, why not link to the commons? Guy0307 ( talk) 02:43, 31 May 2009 (UTC)
Well, now that these types of images have been deprecated (not to mention disliked), why not create a bot to specifically remove these placeholder images from articles (or possibly add the feature to an existing approved bot)? Surely a far-reduced "link to" list would have editors thinking twice about adding these images into an article. A big warning at the top of the page in red warning people not to add this image to an article would also aid in the total retirement of these ugly placeholders. GraYoshi2x► talk 02:58, 13 June 2009 (UTC)
"Use of placeholders in a nutshell: Use of these placeholders in neither encouraged nor deprecated. Although many editors object to their appearance they work for the intended purpose."
{{
edit protected}}
Please add,
Use of placeholders in a nutshell: Use of these placeholders in neither encouraged nor deprecated. Although many editors object to their appearance they work for the intended purpose. |
Or similar language as users as still removing these citing the language currently on the page. -- Banjeboi 01:44, 20 August 2009 (UTC)
Use of these placeholders in neither encouraged nor deprecated. Although they can encourage image submissions, many editors object to their appearance. |
Are you happy with the above message box? — Martin ( MSGJ · talk) 22:21, 23 August 2009 (UTC)
It is deprecated, as explained on the template, the community discussion produced no consensus for inclusion in main space. The bot testing that preceded any discussion should be removed. cygnis insignis 02:59, 24 August 2009 (UTC)
I'm deactivating the request while the discussion continues. — Martin ( MSGJ · talk) 12:34, 24 August 2009 (UTC)
I noticed that the instructions are transcluded onto the file page. Why not use the link= parameter for files [[File:Replace this image - temple.png|100px|link=Wikipedia:Upload/Replace this image/Temple]] as I've done on the right which will take the person to the instruction page directly without all the distractions that are on a File: namespace page.
I like the idea of having them contribute the picture directly to commons; however, commons is even more unfriendly to newcomers than Wikipedia is. Thus I fear that those we want to help, i.e. those who are most likely occasional editors or not currently editors are more likely to be bitten and give up and we will lose their submissions. -- Trödel 14:04, 1 September 2009 (UTC)
{{editprotected}} I'd like to add some pictures to this page as i am the artist,
thanks
Zomdish ( talk) 21:58, 5 June 2010 (UTC)
{{ editprotected}} All I'd want to change here is the non-existence of a picture.
PKK Winder ( talk) 19:03, 9 June 2010 (UTC)
{{
editprotected}}
could you upload picture of Hari Bansha Acharya:
http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/7/7b/Hari_Bansha_Acharya.jpg
Thank you
Sid Ney 14:46, 27 July 2010 (UTC)
This picture? 79.177.20.174 ( talk) 15:53, 5 August 2010 (UTC)
Why can't we use images from Flickr that have a Creative Commons license? —Preceding unsigned comment added by 173.58.64.64 ( talk) 17:38, 28 August 2010 (UTC)
{{
editprotected}}
Routine housekeeping...please correct the license template as follows:
Thanks! Kelly hi! 05:34, 30 December 2010 (UTC)
I uploaded a photo of ahmad kaabour and wish to put it the background information area http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Ahmad_Kaabour.jpg thank you Y.H ( talk) 14:42, 19 February 2011 (UTC)
This
edit request has been answered. Set the |answered= or |ans= parameter to no to reactivate your request. |
Can I add a picture please?
T4ff9 ( talk) 13:59, 24 January 2012 (UTC)
This
edit request has been answered. Set the |answered= or |ans= parameter to no to reactivate your request. |
i want to give pic for this person..
182.185.200.72 ( talk) 15:24, 1 April 2012 (UTC)
Hebrew link is need to be added, i'm not allowed to that : he:ויקיפדיה:תמונה חופשית] -- Midrashah ( talk) 21:51, 28 June 2012 (UTC)
http://i50.tinypic.com/vonddz.jpg —Preceding unsigned comment added by Psyconall ( talk • contribs) 17:36, 5 February 2010 (UTC)
i think it might be nice to have some links to the copyright laws. especially the famous page at cornell that breaks down exactly what is and isnt in the public domain.
ah yes here it is.
http://www.copyright.cornell.edu/public_domain/
Decora ( talk) 01:30, 19 February 2009 (UTC)
See Image talk:Replace this image female.svg#This thing is lame. Punkmorten ( talk) 19:28, 1 January 2008 (UTC)
here you go:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Image:Goldie_2003.jpg (found on the
drum and bass page). —Preceding
unsigned comment added by
62.165.96.134 (
talk) 23:58, 22 March 2008 (UTC)
Among other things (stereotypes, etc), this image looks like the guy had a horrible accident which mutated his head... Why not just use Image:Replace this image1.svg? Skittle ( talk) 11:25, 31 March 2008 (UTC)
I don't like the 'do you own one'. It doesn't matter if someone owns one or not, it's whether they can obtain one in digital form that is free and upload it to Wikipedia. "Can you provide one" would be a lot more sensible. Richard001 ( talk) 01:43, 5 April 2008 (UTC)
A discussion concerning the use of image placeholders has opened at Wikipedia:Centralized discussion/Image placeholders and may be of interest to editors watching this image. The placeholder images have recently been uploaded to 50,000 articles, and while there has been disagreement about the use of these images in various corners, there has not been a centralized discussion on this issue affecting the community. Please contribute your thoughts and publicize this discussion anywhere you feel would be appropriate. Thank you. Northwesterner1 ( talk) 10:36, 12 April 2008 (UTC)
I have contacted Norm Johnson and received his permission to place a photo of him here (one from his personal webpage) I have this documentation (though not a "legal release" in the context of a signed/notarized form) but an email from him stating he would be very happy to have his photo included. Is that enough to post it? If not, as I have means to contact him, what do I need to add this image? Thanks, just want to do this right. —Preceding unsigned comment added by OneHappyHusky ( talk • contribs) 02:19, 14 April 2008 (UTC)
I've made a new version in the meantime:
(I couldn't replace the old image because the page was protected.) I'd be happy to make one for the female if anyone's interested. Tlogmer ( talk / contributions ) 12:16, 24 April 2008 (UTC)
You may publish an image of Slipher from the following homepages: http://www.roe.ac.uk/~jap/slipher/ http://www.lowell.edu/Research/library/paper/vm_slipher_pict.html I am only a registered wikipedia-member in Germany an I don't want pass through the bureaucracy of wikipedia because of the foto (have tried it once in Germany). (rwalle, 29.05.2008) —Preceding unsigned comment added by 84.171.193.219 ( talk) 14:59, 29 May 2008 (UTC)
{{ editprotected}} es:Imagen:Falta imagen hombre.svg Could someone add this?-- Domingo Portales ( talk) 20:39, 13 May 2008 (UTC)
Why not add public domain to the suggestions for how to release your rights to an image you own? To some this may be preferable to the various nonsense "licenses". —Preceding unsigned comment added by 87.112.231.232 ( talk) 21:25, 13 June 2008 (UTC)
I think a mention as to why the placeholder was put there would be appropriate in the image description. Untill I had completely read WP:NFC, I couldn't understand why a non-free picture would not be accepted per fair use policy. Here's the relevant part:
While after reading it I could understand how this fit with fair use, I couldn't really figure it out before. -- Dandin1 ( talk) 01:05, 7 July 2008 (UTC)
To give background, I have been a very vocal opponent of how contrasting the image is (I support lowering the image contrast of the human figure to almost non-visibility). However, I am in a hotel on their computer and the background image of the human in the picture succesfully looks almost opaque and is dramatically lighter in color, but the image has not been modified since many months back when I first started having an issue with it. I am wondering why the image is so different. It suggests to me that Wikipedia users and those in the debate regarding this image are seeing two different images of it. Perhaps the background color is actually not Web Color compatible or compatible to those with older video cards and shows differently to some -- has anyone compared how the image looks with a 16-bit True Color format compared to 32-bit True Color? On my personal computer I use 800 x 600 res and 16-bit True Color -- and the background person is jarringly contrasting (a big gray thing looming in the background) and this contrast is why I am so vocal against the image. With whatever settings the hotel has, though, the image is not bad at all. Anyone have an answer? (Question crosslinked to David Gerard, the most recent image changer). -- Guroadrunner ( talk) 06:19, 9 August 2008 (UTC)
Why isn't this image showing up? It's just showing a blank in the infoboxen; see James Otto for instance. Ten Pound Hammer and his otters • ( Broken clamshells • Otter chirps • HELP) 21:43, 25 August 2008 (UTC)
{{Editprotected}}
I keep encountering this thing in articles; not all editors are aware of the Centralized Discussion that nixed, by WP community-wide consensus, the use of this and similar images on article pages, and some are thus still deploying it. The status of this image as deprecated is very clear and needs to be made clearer (but it should not be deleted; the centralized and pre-centralized debates about it are of great precedential value, but would be rendered rather inexplicable if the image disappeared, as it is used numerous times in the course of the debate).
{{Warning|1=Do not add this image to article pages. The proposal to add such images to articles [[Wikipedia:Centralized discussion/Image placeholders|has been rejected]]. The image is preserved for historical reasons, as it is frequently cited in the proposal debates.}}
These changes should be applied to any and all images in this series. I have so far tagged two of them for this editprotected cleanup.
— SMcCandlish [ talk] [ cont] ‹(-¿-)› 09:23, 17 September 2008 (UTC)
From reading Wikipedia:Centralized discussion/Image placeholders, the status of this image as deprecated is not clear at all. Which discussion was the image actually deprecated in? -- Brilliand ( talk) 19:45, 3 November 2008 (UTC)
Please let us use this image for public purposes and add the syntax: "Hình:Ngoi_sao_nam.svg", too. Thanks a lot. TanPhat Nguyen.
I have a very recent portrait photo of Anger, which I took during his performance with Brian Butler as Technicolor Skull in Copenhagen last saturdag (8th of october 2008), and I'm willing to publish it under a creative commons share alike lince, but I can't seem to upload it since I am not a autoconfirmed member. Does anybody have any help to offer? —Preceding unsigned comment added by Magnuskaslov ( talk • contribs) 17:32, 12 November 2008 (UTC)
This image needs a source and a license.-- Rockfang ( talk) 10:04, 17 December 2008 (UTC)
Aren't all images on the Internet free? I mean, since when do you have to pay to save a picture?-- Xasitchaine ( talk) 21:08, 11 April 2009 (UTC)
{{ editprotected}} Could an admin please add the following text to this image's page:
This image is based on [http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/archive/c/cd/20070323163647%21Male_no_free_image_yet.svg this version] of [[:Commons:Image:Male no free image yet.svg]], produced by [[:Commons:User:Editor at Large]] (En user: [[User:Editor at Large]]) based on the original [[:Commons:Image:Male_no_free_image_yet.png]] produced by [[:Commons:User:Geni]] (En user: [[User:Geni]]). {{PD-because|Original work of User:Geni released into PD, adaptation by User:Editor at Large also released into PD}}
Please see the above section as to why I'm requesting this. I got the above bolded information from a link in the licensing template here.-- Rockfang ( talk) 01:12, 18 December 2008 (UTC)
It should be enough that anyone who owns the copyright to a picture allows it to be put on here - to have to give it up and subscribe to some of wikipedias political notions is amoral and wrong. So drop the bullshit about releasing it under any kind of nonsense license. -- EnBruger ( talk) 23:22, 22 February 2009 (UTC)
Why no one use a picture of him like this: http://www.experienceeldorado.tv/cms/images/stories/perrykingheadshot-newa.jpg —Preceding unsigned comment added by 78.51.235.92 ( talk) 18:49, 21 May 2009 (UTC)
Instead of giving a link to a wp upload, why not link to the commons? Guy0307 ( talk) 02:43, 31 May 2009 (UTC)
Well, now that these types of images have been deprecated (not to mention disliked), why not create a bot to specifically remove these placeholder images from articles (or possibly add the feature to an existing approved bot)? Surely a far-reduced "link to" list would have editors thinking twice about adding these images into an article. A big warning at the top of the page in red warning people not to add this image to an article would also aid in the total retirement of these ugly placeholders. GraYoshi2x► talk 02:58, 13 June 2009 (UTC)
"Use of placeholders in a nutshell: Use of these placeholders in neither encouraged nor deprecated. Although many editors object to their appearance they work for the intended purpose."
{{
edit protected}}
Please add,
Use of placeholders in a nutshell: Use of these placeholders in neither encouraged nor deprecated. Although many editors object to their appearance they work for the intended purpose. |
Or similar language as users as still removing these citing the language currently on the page. -- Banjeboi 01:44, 20 August 2009 (UTC)
Use of these placeholders in neither encouraged nor deprecated. Although they can encourage image submissions, many editors object to their appearance. |
Are you happy with the above message box? — Martin ( MSGJ · talk) 22:21, 23 August 2009 (UTC)
It is deprecated, as explained on the template, the community discussion produced no consensus for inclusion in main space. The bot testing that preceded any discussion should be removed. cygnis insignis 02:59, 24 August 2009 (UTC)
I'm deactivating the request while the discussion continues. — Martin ( MSGJ · talk) 12:34, 24 August 2009 (UTC)
I noticed that the instructions are transcluded onto the file page. Why not use the link= parameter for files [[File:Replace this image - temple.png|100px|link=Wikipedia:Upload/Replace this image/Temple]] as I've done on the right which will take the person to the instruction page directly without all the distractions that are on a File: namespace page.
I like the idea of having them contribute the picture directly to commons; however, commons is even more unfriendly to newcomers than Wikipedia is. Thus I fear that those we want to help, i.e. those who are most likely occasional editors or not currently editors are more likely to be bitten and give up and we will lose their submissions. -- Trödel 14:04, 1 September 2009 (UTC)
{{editprotected}} I'd like to add some pictures to this page as i am the artist,
thanks
Zomdish ( talk) 21:58, 5 June 2010 (UTC)
{{ editprotected}} All I'd want to change here is the non-existence of a picture.
PKK Winder ( talk) 19:03, 9 June 2010 (UTC)
{{
editprotected}}
could you upload picture of Hari Bansha Acharya:
http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/7/7b/Hari_Bansha_Acharya.jpg
Thank you
Sid Ney 14:46, 27 July 2010 (UTC)
This picture? 79.177.20.174 ( talk) 15:53, 5 August 2010 (UTC)
Why can't we use images from Flickr that have a Creative Commons license? —Preceding unsigned comment added by 173.58.64.64 ( talk) 17:38, 28 August 2010 (UTC)
{{
editprotected}}
Routine housekeeping...please correct the license template as follows:
Thanks! Kelly hi! 05:34, 30 December 2010 (UTC)
I uploaded a photo of ahmad kaabour and wish to put it the background information area http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Ahmad_Kaabour.jpg thank you Y.H ( talk) 14:42, 19 February 2011 (UTC)
This
edit request has been answered. Set the |answered= or |ans= parameter to no to reactivate your request. |
Can I add a picture please?
T4ff9 ( talk) 13:59, 24 January 2012 (UTC)
This
edit request has been answered. Set the |answered= or |ans= parameter to no to reactivate your request. |
i want to give pic for this person..
182.185.200.72 ( talk) 15:24, 1 April 2012 (UTC)
Hebrew link is need to be added, i'm not allowed to that : he:ויקיפדיה:תמונה חופשית] -- Midrashah ( talk) 21:51, 28 June 2012 (UTC)