Disambiguation | ||||
|
Lists Project‑class Top‑importance | ||||||||||
|
Wikipedia has several talk pages relating to lists. (This page is just the talk page of the Wikipedia:Lists disambiguation page, and people do not watchlist it or discuss things here).
You may be looking for:
I haven't seen this discussed yet -- I've come across a list during New Pages Patrol that is predominately (could be exclusively) populated using a derivative of <nowiki>Template:Wdtable row</nowiki>. My feeling is that this is an altogether new list type and would not be out of place here. I'm just wondering if there has been a discussion around this list type or not and what the community consensus (if one exists) in relation to this "new" list type. Thanks for your input or referral (to another forum). --User:Ceyockey ( talk to me) 01:49, 31 August 2022 (UTC)
Thanks for bringing this up Ceyockey. Contrary to the comments above, this has not been disallowed by any RfC. I am very familiar with previous discussions related to Wikidata. The relevant summaries from Wikipedia:Wikidata seem to be:
I don't really think this is a "new list type". If this is done correctly, then the final result will be a list article that meets all the relevant MoS the guidelines, and specifically Wikipedia:Manual of Style/Tables. I disagree with a lot of the other comments by Fram. One of the main purposes of Wikidata is to support other Wikimeda projects such as Wikipedia, and its goal to provide reliably sourced information is entirely in line with our own. You might as well say we shouldn't use Commons because it's a separate project with different goals. Regards — Martin ( MSGJ · talk) 10:08, 8 September 2022 (UTC)
Please comment at Wikipedia:Village pump (proposals)#Wikidata lists if you have time — Martin ( MSGJ · talk) 17:55, 19 September 2022 (UTC)
Disambiguation | ||||
|
Lists Project‑class Top‑importance | ||||||||||
|
Wikipedia has several talk pages relating to lists. (This page is just the talk page of the Wikipedia:Lists disambiguation page, and people do not watchlist it or discuss things here).
You may be looking for:
I haven't seen this discussed yet -- I've come across a list during New Pages Patrol that is predominately (could be exclusively) populated using a derivative of <nowiki>Template:Wdtable row</nowiki>. My feeling is that this is an altogether new list type and would not be out of place here. I'm just wondering if there has been a discussion around this list type or not and what the community consensus (if one exists) in relation to this "new" list type. Thanks for your input or referral (to another forum). --User:Ceyockey ( talk to me) 01:49, 31 August 2022 (UTC)
Thanks for bringing this up Ceyockey. Contrary to the comments above, this has not been disallowed by any RfC. I am very familiar with previous discussions related to Wikidata. The relevant summaries from Wikipedia:Wikidata seem to be:
I don't really think this is a "new list type". If this is done correctly, then the final result will be a list article that meets all the relevant MoS the guidelines, and specifically Wikipedia:Manual of Style/Tables. I disagree with a lot of the other comments by Fram. One of the main purposes of Wikidata is to support other Wikimeda projects such as Wikipedia, and its goal to provide reliably sourced information is entirely in line with our own. You might as well say we shouldn't use Commons because it's a separate project with different goals. Regards — Martin ( MSGJ · talk) 10:08, 8 September 2022 (UTC)
Please comment at Wikipedia:Village pump (proposals)#Wikidata lists if you have time — Martin ( MSGJ · talk) 17:55, 19 September 2022 (UTC)