Lists Project‑class High‑importance | ||||||||||
|
This is the
talk page for discussing improvements to the
Set index articles page. |
|
Archives: 1Auto-archiving period: 365 days |
Threads older than 365 days may be archived by Lowercase sigmabot III. |
I've been sorting through some articles and need a bit of guidance with regard to SIAs. Take these three for example: Buk-gu, Champions Park, Cheongoksan. All are currently classified as dab pages, but since they all list things of the same type I'd say they meet the SIA criteria. I'm just a bit reluctant to make any changes though as I'm not convinced I'd be doing the right thing. PC78 ( talk) 00:43, 18 August 2019 (UTC)
If something looks like a disambiguation page, but contains only plants, it is indeed a set index article, DexDor says no, and others are just confused. I personally find DexDor's argument about avoiding mistargeted links very convincing. Any editor who links to Western State Hospital is intending to refer to a specific hospital, not the set of hospitals that share that name - getting the benefit of bot warnings when linking to that name seems really important.
I've raised a question at MediaWiki talk:Gadget-metadata.js#Set-index articles regarding the title colour of set-index articles, which are still being displayed in the same green colour as disambiguation pages. For those not familiar with the gadget, it can be enabled at Preferences... Gadgets... Appearance... "Display an assessment of an article's quality in its page header". I believe "List purple" might be a preferable colour as I'm not sure whether the Set-index lilac (per SIA at Category:Articles by quality) would be too pale to show up against a white background. -- Jameboy ( talk) 15:36, 16 January 2023 (UTC)
Editors watching this page might be interested to join a discussion at Wikipedia talk:Content assessment#Pages rated as Disambig-class which are not disambiguation pages — Martin ( MSGJ · talk) 15:25, 6 December 2023 (UTC)
Template:Double soft redirect has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the entry on the Templates for discussion page. -- 65.92.247.90 ( talk) 04:52, 15 December 2023 (UTC)
Please see Wikipedia talk:Content assessment#Request for comment — Martin ( MSGJ · talk) 18:06, 1 January 2024 (UTC)
There is a proposal at Module talk:WikiProject banner#More page types to automatically assess SIAs as List-class on the content assessment scheme. If anyone has an opinion, please comment there — Martin ( MSGJ · talk) 09:02, 27 February 2024 (UTC)
Lists Project‑class High‑importance | ||||||||||
|
This is the
talk page for discussing improvements to the
Set index articles page. |
|
Archives: 1Auto-archiving period: 365 days |
Threads older than 365 days may be archived by Lowercase sigmabot III. |
I've been sorting through some articles and need a bit of guidance with regard to SIAs. Take these three for example: Buk-gu, Champions Park, Cheongoksan. All are currently classified as dab pages, but since they all list things of the same type I'd say they meet the SIA criteria. I'm just a bit reluctant to make any changes though as I'm not convinced I'd be doing the right thing. PC78 ( talk) 00:43, 18 August 2019 (UTC)
If something looks like a disambiguation page, but contains only plants, it is indeed a set index article, DexDor says no, and others are just confused. I personally find DexDor's argument about avoiding mistargeted links very convincing. Any editor who links to Western State Hospital is intending to refer to a specific hospital, not the set of hospitals that share that name - getting the benefit of bot warnings when linking to that name seems really important.
I've raised a question at MediaWiki talk:Gadget-metadata.js#Set-index articles regarding the title colour of set-index articles, which are still being displayed in the same green colour as disambiguation pages. For those not familiar with the gadget, it can be enabled at Preferences... Gadgets... Appearance... "Display an assessment of an article's quality in its page header". I believe "List purple" might be a preferable colour as I'm not sure whether the Set-index lilac (per SIA at Category:Articles by quality) would be too pale to show up against a white background. -- Jameboy ( talk) 15:36, 16 January 2023 (UTC)
Editors watching this page might be interested to join a discussion at Wikipedia talk:Content assessment#Pages rated as Disambig-class which are not disambiguation pages — Martin ( MSGJ · talk) 15:25, 6 December 2023 (UTC)
Template:Double soft redirect has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the entry on the Templates for discussion page. -- 65.92.247.90 ( talk) 04:52, 15 December 2023 (UTC)
Please see Wikipedia talk:Content assessment#Request for comment — Martin ( MSGJ · talk) 18:06, 1 January 2024 (UTC)
There is a proposal at Module talk:WikiProject banner#More page types to automatically assess SIAs as List-class on the content assessment scheme. If anyone has an opinion, please comment there — Martin ( MSGJ · talk) 09:02, 27 February 2024 (UTC)