![]() | This page is an archive of past discussions. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page. |
I noticed this "Nature makes all articles free to view" which allows those that are subscribed to give a read-only PDF to people who are not subscribed. This should be helpful with the paywalled Nature papers that articles use for references, as the free-access PDF can be used as the URL link -- 67.70.35.44 ( talk) 14:15, 2 December 2014 (UTC)
Hi! A problem has come to light with sklogwiki.org, from which content has been copied in good faith, and with proper attribution, into several articles here: content on that wiki is licensed CC-BY-NC-SA, which unfortunately is not compatible here. I've had to remove content from Path integral molecular dynamics (there's some discussion on the talk page there), and have found similar incompatibilities at Andersen thermostat, Stockmayer potential and Patchy particles. All those articles need to be rewritten (if the topics are important): I don't know if other pages are also affected. I did wonder, though, if a simpler approach might be to ask sklogwiki to remove the "NC" ("non-commercial") restriction from its license, which would solve the problem; and if anyone here would like to undertake to do that? Justlettersandnumbers ( talk) 00:13, 4 December 2014 (UTC)
Hi, I have been doing a bit of gnoming and came across Magnetic skyrmion. It is not in a good state, citations, etc. This is beyond my ken, so I am bringing it to some expert attention here. Hamish59 ( talk) 12:29, 5 December 2014 (UTC)
There's a redirect at Energy system redirecting to an ATP metabolism article. It occurs to me that there are many energy systems, and that this should lead elsewhere or be a disambiguation page. Do we have a general article or would it be energy ? (note also a discussion at talk:energy systems ) -- 67.70.35.44 ( talk) 06:20, 7 December 2014 (UTC)
Hi, this is to let you know that we've launched WikiProject Wikidata for research in order to stimulate a closer interaction between Wikidata and research, both on a technical and a community level. As a first activity, we are drafting a research proposal on the matter (cf. blog post). Your thoughts on and contributions to that would be most welcome! Thanks, -- Daniel Mietchen ( talk) 02:15, 9 December 2014 (UTC)
Hi, I'm working on a project to find important academic citations missing from Wikipedia, which I think might be useful for this Wikiproject. It's just a proof of concept right now, but if you have any ideas or feedback, that'd be really helpful at this early stage. Check it out: Open Access Reader.
EdSaperia ( talk) 13:18, 9 December 2014 (UTC)
Hi! I blanked the Start-Class-rating this article a while ago after I had done some -hopefully- improvements and just noticed that Meno25 re-evaluated it to Class C on 21.11.2014. He pointed me to here to place the following question: Please, can you can give me some hints to possibly increase the quality of this article in the direction to Class B, or point me to someone else to bother about this question? Thanks in advance. Purgy ( talk) 10:37, 10 December 2014 (UTC)
According to Signpost, this image (subject of the article Chronology of the universe) is now classified as a featured picture. However, it seems to me that it badly misrepresents the scale of the universe and its rate of change as functions of time. Or at least, no indication is given of how the horizontal and vertical axes should be interpreted. JRSpriggs ( talk) 10:30, 19 November 2014 (UTC)
Hi everyone,
I just wanted to point out that M-theory is currently a good article nominee. It would be great if someone on here could review the article!
Thanks!
Polytope24 ( talk) 18:44, 20 December 2014 (UTC)
This old draft is still kicking around. I found more info at the non-equilibrium thermodynamics page, which implies that the Prigogine Theorem is essentially worthless. Should I reject it or is it a significant enough (invalid) theorem that it merits its own page? Primefac ( talk) 23:39, 25 December 2014 (UTC)
At least three supersymmetry related articles ( Bogomol'nyi–Prasad–Sommerfield bound, Supergravity, Superconformal algebra) feature parsing errors. I am not sure what exactly is going wrong. -- Omnipaedista ( talk) 17:55, 24 December 2014 (UTC)
Hi!
There has been a storm of activity the past week (by few authors). I think we need more to chip in since the article is (ought to be) pretty vital in physics (and mathematics by extension to today's math-infested QM applications). The interested could perhaps have a look at Talk:Quantum mechanics#1920s quantum mechanics not obsolete. YohanN7 ( talk) 11:59, 29 December 2014 (UTC)
Hi there; this is just a quick note to let you all know that the 2015 WikiCup will begin on January 1st. The WikiCup is an annual competition to encourage high-quality contributions to Wikipedia by adding a little friendly competition to editing. At the time of writing, more than fifty users have signed up to take part in the competition; interested parties, no matter their level of experience or their editing interests, are warmly invited to sign up. Questions are welcome on the WikiCup talk page. Thanks! Miyagawa ( talk) 21:54, 29 December 2014 (UTC)
![]() | This page is an archive of past discussions. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page. |
I noticed this "Nature makes all articles free to view" which allows those that are subscribed to give a read-only PDF to people who are not subscribed. This should be helpful with the paywalled Nature papers that articles use for references, as the free-access PDF can be used as the URL link -- 67.70.35.44 ( talk) 14:15, 2 December 2014 (UTC)
Hi! A problem has come to light with sklogwiki.org, from which content has been copied in good faith, and with proper attribution, into several articles here: content on that wiki is licensed CC-BY-NC-SA, which unfortunately is not compatible here. I've had to remove content from Path integral molecular dynamics (there's some discussion on the talk page there), and have found similar incompatibilities at Andersen thermostat, Stockmayer potential and Patchy particles. All those articles need to be rewritten (if the topics are important): I don't know if other pages are also affected. I did wonder, though, if a simpler approach might be to ask sklogwiki to remove the "NC" ("non-commercial") restriction from its license, which would solve the problem; and if anyone here would like to undertake to do that? Justlettersandnumbers ( talk) 00:13, 4 December 2014 (UTC)
Hi, I have been doing a bit of gnoming and came across Magnetic skyrmion. It is not in a good state, citations, etc. This is beyond my ken, so I am bringing it to some expert attention here. Hamish59 ( talk) 12:29, 5 December 2014 (UTC)
There's a redirect at Energy system redirecting to an ATP metabolism article. It occurs to me that there are many energy systems, and that this should lead elsewhere or be a disambiguation page. Do we have a general article or would it be energy ? (note also a discussion at talk:energy systems ) -- 67.70.35.44 ( talk) 06:20, 7 December 2014 (UTC)
Hi, this is to let you know that we've launched WikiProject Wikidata for research in order to stimulate a closer interaction between Wikidata and research, both on a technical and a community level. As a first activity, we are drafting a research proposal on the matter (cf. blog post). Your thoughts on and contributions to that would be most welcome! Thanks, -- Daniel Mietchen ( talk) 02:15, 9 December 2014 (UTC)
Hi, I'm working on a project to find important academic citations missing from Wikipedia, which I think might be useful for this Wikiproject. It's just a proof of concept right now, but if you have any ideas or feedback, that'd be really helpful at this early stage. Check it out: Open Access Reader.
EdSaperia ( talk) 13:18, 9 December 2014 (UTC)
Hi! I blanked the Start-Class-rating this article a while ago after I had done some -hopefully- improvements and just noticed that Meno25 re-evaluated it to Class C on 21.11.2014. He pointed me to here to place the following question: Please, can you can give me some hints to possibly increase the quality of this article in the direction to Class B, or point me to someone else to bother about this question? Thanks in advance. Purgy ( talk) 10:37, 10 December 2014 (UTC)
According to Signpost, this image (subject of the article Chronology of the universe) is now classified as a featured picture. However, it seems to me that it badly misrepresents the scale of the universe and its rate of change as functions of time. Or at least, no indication is given of how the horizontal and vertical axes should be interpreted. JRSpriggs ( talk) 10:30, 19 November 2014 (UTC)
Hi everyone,
I just wanted to point out that M-theory is currently a good article nominee. It would be great if someone on here could review the article!
Thanks!
Polytope24 ( talk) 18:44, 20 December 2014 (UTC)
This old draft is still kicking around. I found more info at the non-equilibrium thermodynamics page, which implies that the Prigogine Theorem is essentially worthless. Should I reject it or is it a significant enough (invalid) theorem that it merits its own page? Primefac ( talk) 23:39, 25 December 2014 (UTC)
At least three supersymmetry related articles ( Bogomol'nyi–Prasad–Sommerfield bound, Supergravity, Superconformal algebra) feature parsing errors. I am not sure what exactly is going wrong. -- Omnipaedista ( talk) 17:55, 24 December 2014 (UTC)
Hi!
There has been a storm of activity the past week (by few authors). I think we need more to chip in since the article is (ought to be) pretty vital in physics (and mathematics by extension to today's math-infested QM applications). The interested could perhaps have a look at Talk:Quantum mechanics#1920s quantum mechanics not obsolete. YohanN7 ( talk) 11:59, 29 December 2014 (UTC)
Hi there; this is just a quick note to let you all know that the 2015 WikiCup will begin on January 1st. The WikiCup is an annual competition to encourage high-quality contributions to Wikipedia by adding a little friendly competition to editing. At the time of writing, more than fifty users have signed up to take part in the competition; interested parties, no matter their level of experience or their editing interests, are warmly invited to sign up. Questions are welcome on the WikiCup talk page. Thanks! Miyagawa ( talk) 21:54, 29 December 2014 (UTC)