This talk page is not monitored by many editors. For more prompt attention, please leave a message at Wikipedia talk:WikiProject LGBT studies. |
LGBT studies Project‑class | |||||||
|
Articles tagged with the {{ LGBTProject}} template
I was cleaning up the template section of the Project page when I noticed that there are two stub templates: 1. {{ LGBT-stub}}
2. {{ LGBTProject | class=Stub}}
Is there some way to include the Category:LGBT stubs in Category:Stub-Class LGBT articles? -- Tiger Marc ROAR! 00:03, 1 January 2007 (UTC)
Just curious if anyone is changing tags from other wikiprojects when adding our tag? For instance, since I'm doing the actors category, I'm running in to WP:WPBIO tags on most of the articles. When I add ours, I review the article (quickly) and make a snap judgment of what class it is. I just add our tag and class - are other people adding their class to, say, the WP:WPBIO tag? -- SatyrTN ( talk | contribs) 04:06, 11 January 2007 (UTC)
Dev, what's the web address for the tool that updates WPV1 Assessment Log? -- SatyrTN ( talk | contribs) 15:26, 14 February 2007 (UTC)
The Evan Wolfson article is currently rated a B-Class when I think it is pretty clearly an A-class article. It is sourced, categorized, imaged, balanced, exhaustive, and well-written. -- DavidShankBone 19:30, 14 February 2007 (UTC)
Hi, You guys (and gals) seem to be very up to date with your assessments, have you a backlog of tagging or anything that needs doing?
As i have a bot approved for tagging ( User:Reedy Bot) using WP:AWB and Kingbotk's Plugin.
Let me know if you have, or want me to run through your cats to check for them (can do a list compare of tagged articles and the articles in the cats)
Reedy Boy 22:59, 24 March 2007 (UTC)
Though we now have the LGBT core topics list, it appears that this bot will be looking for the standardized importance rankings for composing offline releases. I'm afraid the LGBT articles will be at the mercy of a backfill algorithm (which appears to look at the number of links from other articles) unless they are assigned priority/importance by humans. -- Beland 00:23, 10 April 2007 (UTC)
I've recently tagged and assessed 5 articles that I happened upon (not following a LGBT list). What do I need to do next, if anything? Do I need to add to a list of some sort? Jacksinterweb ( talk) 15:08, 23 November 2007 (UTC)
Has there been any thought given to adding {{ Template-Class}}, {{ Disambig-Class}}, {{ Portal-Class}} or {{ Image-Class}} to your assessment scale? This would save {{ Non-Article-Class}} for WP pages (like this one). We have recently done a similar thing at WP:VG, and it is becoming really useful for project maintenance. Our template tags non-mainspace pages by namespace too, though it's still a little buggy... Just an idea. ~ JohnnyMrNinja 06:23, 19 July 2008 (UTC)
On Carlos Monsiváis's talkpage, another editor outed this recently dead Mexican poet. Although, it appears to be public knowledge as online articles were provided, that's a tacky way of doing this. As the editor, who 5x expanded his article, I humbly request your wikiproject adopt his article, improve it and bring it to a B classed article. I firmly believe it could be FA with copyedits. ---- moreno oso ( talk) 22:32, 24 June 2010 (UTC)
In this article, the article for Jack Harkness is given as an example of an A-Class article, but if you look at Jack Harkness' talk page, its class is given as GA-class. Which is correct? -- 66.167.244.240 ( talk) 19:50, 26 September 2010 (UTC)
Hello, your project includes an article on the musician June Millington that has long been classified as a Stub. I have recently expanded the article significantly, so I suggest that someone from the project consider whether it now deserves a better assessment. Given my own work in other projects, I suggest a "C" grade. Sincerely, -- DOOMSDAYER520 ( Talk| Contribs) 18:13, 16 August 2012 (UTC)
I have made a change to requesting assessments from adding a done check mark to a completed assessment to removing the request and leaving an appropriate edit summary by the assessor. This is in line with other WikiProjects, as there is no need to have years worth of assessments left on the page. I have also tackled the backlog of assessments - years? -and will continue to assess articles requested. Any help in assessments is welcome. I you would like an article assessed by a neutral party, do add your request to the bottom of the list at Requesting an Assessment. Cheers Gmcbjames ( talk) 18:10, 21 August 2015 (UTC)
Greetings, all. Frankly, and though I'm long in the tooth as far as my Wikipedia age is concerned, I'm surprised to discover that articles in the LGBT project are not getting an assessment as to their overall encyclopaeidic importance. I suggest we need it. (This is an informal proposal to get things, hopefully, rolling. Perhaps a more formal process, i.e. an RfC, may subsequently be needed.) - The Gnome ( talk) 18:33, 20 January 2022 (UTC)
This talk page is not monitored by many editors. For more prompt attention, please leave a message at Wikipedia talk:WikiProject LGBT studies. |
LGBT studies Project‑class | |||||||
|
Articles tagged with the {{ LGBTProject}} template
I was cleaning up the template section of the Project page when I noticed that there are two stub templates: 1. {{ LGBT-stub}}
2. {{ LGBTProject | class=Stub}}
Is there some way to include the Category:LGBT stubs in Category:Stub-Class LGBT articles? -- Tiger Marc ROAR! 00:03, 1 January 2007 (UTC)
Just curious if anyone is changing tags from other wikiprojects when adding our tag? For instance, since I'm doing the actors category, I'm running in to WP:WPBIO tags on most of the articles. When I add ours, I review the article (quickly) and make a snap judgment of what class it is. I just add our tag and class - are other people adding their class to, say, the WP:WPBIO tag? -- SatyrTN ( talk | contribs) 04:06, 11 January 2007 (UTC)
Dev, what's the web address for the tool that updates WPV1 Assessment Log? -- SatyrTN ( talk | contribs) 15:26, 14 February 2007 (UTC)
The Evan Wolfson article is currently rated a B-Class when I think it is pretty clearly an A-class article. It is sourced, categorized, imaged, balanced, exhaustive, and well-written. -- DavidShankBone 19:30, 14 February 2007 (UTC)
Hi, You guys (and gals) seem to be very up to date with your assessments, have you a backlog of tagging or anything that needs doing?
As i have a bot approved for tagging ( User:Reedy Bot) using WP:AWB and Kingbotk's Plugin.
Let me know if you have, or want me to run through your cats to check for them (can do a list compare of tagged articles and the articles in the cats)
Reedy Boy 22:59, 24 March 2007 (UTC)
Though we now have the LGBT core topics list, it appears that this bot will be looking for the standardized importance rankings for composing offline releases. I'm afraid the LGBT articles will be at the mercy of a backfill algorithm (which appears to look at the number of links from other articles) unless they are assigned priority/importance by humans. -- Beland 00:23, 10 April 2007 (UTC)
I've recently tagged and assessed 5 articles that I happened upon (not following a LGBT list). What do I need to do next, if anything? Do I need to add to a list of some sort? Jacksinterweb ( talk) 15:08, 23 November 2007 (UTC)
Has there been any thought given to adding {{ Template-Class}}, {{ Disambig-Class}}, {{ Portal-Class}} or {{ Image-Class}} to your assessment scale? This would save {{ Non-Article-Class}} for WP pages (like this one). We have recently done a similar thing at WP:VG, and it is becoming really useful for project maintenance. Our template tags non-mainspace pages by namespace too, though it's still a little buggy... Just an idea. ~ JohnnyMrNinja 06:23, 19 July 2008 (UTC)
On Carlos Monsiváis's talkpage, another editor outed this recently dead Mexican poet. Although, it appears to be public knowledge as online articles were provided, that's a tacky way of doing this. As the editor, who 5x expanded his article, I humbly request your wikiproject adopt his article, improve it and bring it to a B classed article. I firmly believe it could be FA with copyedits. ---- moreno oso ( talk) 22:32, 24 June 2010 (UTC)
In this article, the article for Jack Harkness is given as an example of an A-Class article, but if you look at Jack Harkness' talk page, its class is given as GA-class. Which is correct? -- 66.167.244.240 ( talk) 19:50, 26 September 2010 (UTC)
Hello, your project includes an article on the musician June Millington that has long been classified as a Stub. I have recently expanded the article significantly, so I suggest that someone from the project consider whether it now deserves a better assessment. Given my own work in other projects, I suggest a "C" grade. Sincerely, -- DOOMSDAYER520 ( Talk| Contribs) 18:13, 16 August 2012 (UTC)
I have made a change to requesting assessments from adding a done check mark to a completed assessment to removing the request and leaving an appropriate edit summary by the assessor. This is in line with other WikiProjects, as there is no need to have years worth of assessments left on the page. I have also tackled the backlog of assessments - years? -and will continue to assess articles requested. Any help in assessments is welcome. I you would like an article assessed by a neutral party, do add your request to the bottom of the list at Requesting an Assessment. Cheers Gmcbjames ( talk) 18:10, 21 August 2015 (UTC)
Greetings, all. Frankly, and though I'm long in the tooth as far as my Wikipedia age is concerned, I'm surprised to discover that articles in the LGBT project are not getting an assessment as to their overall encyclopaeidic importance. I suggest we need it. (This is an informal proposal to get things, hopefully, rolling. Perhaps a more formal process, i.e. an RfC, may subsequently be needed.) - The Gnome ( talk) 18:33, 20 January 2022 (UTC)