This is the
talk page for discussing improvements to the
Deprecated and orphaned templates page. |
|
This page was nominated for deletion on 11 August 2007. The result of the discussion was speedy close (bad venue). |
This page was nominated for deletion on 4 January 2014. The result of the discussion was mark as historical. |
These templates are the parts of the categories, Category:Party shortnames templates (India) and Category:Party colours templates (India) which will be using on other templates. Some of them are already part of the Category:LS2004 templates. So, I object of complete deletion of these templates. Regards, Shyam ( T/ C) 02:45, 6 August 2007 (UTC)
How does this process account for templates that have not been transcluded (ie, templates that are substituted)? -- bainer ( talk) 00:38, 12 August 2007 (UTC)
I suggest this page use the wording of WP:PROD as much as possible, to avoid confusion between the two processes. >Radiant< 09:13, 13 August 2007 (UTC)
Since this page "is not a deletion process" but rather "a way to aggregate templates that can be deleted", I suggest moving it to Wikipedia:Deprecated and orphaned templates. As long as it remains a subpage of Wikipedia:Templates for deletion, it will be perceived as a formal deletion process. — Black Falcon ( Talk) 21:05, 15 August 2007 (UTC)
The scope of Category:Deprecated and orphaned templates and Category:Deprecated templates seems to be similar. I would expect that most of the templates in the latter could be transferred to the former for deletion (and perhaps the latter category could be disbanded/deleted). — Black Falcon ( Talk) 00:39, 20 August 2007 (UTC)
Could be used in the Astronomy article. Master of Puppets Care to share? 00:16, 13 November 2007 (UTC)
Template:Deln trk LoPbN Entry served
My recollection is that i never noticed anyone but myself using the template; if there were instances of the template in use when the roughly a thousand pages of LoPbN content and infrastructure were deleted under Deletion Review, some bios on "the deletion track" may have escaped attention, since i was indisposed from even the normal process of following up on them at the time, let alone doing so under the conditions of disruption of the templates function that the LoPbN deletion imposed. But that would be of small moment, and no objection to the template's deletion will come from me.
--
Jerzy•
t 02:59, 19 November 2007 (UTC)
There are currently two sections: "Templates currently marked for deletion" and "Templates ready to be deleted" - What's the difference? — Sebastian 04:22, 20 December 2007 (UTC)
Per the notice sent to me by User:Black Falcon, I have removed the {{deprecated}} tag from this template, as I disagree with the nomination for deletion.
As a member of Canada's military forces, there are times when it is important to me to have a disclaimer that what I am saying is personal opinion and not representative of the Government of Canada. I created the template so that other users who might feel a similar requirement could easily include such a disclaimer. I would be happy to generalize the template so that it could be used by a member of any nation's military. Thanks. ¥ Jacky Tar 05:40, 6 April 2008 (UTC)
Hi -- In wp:NRHP there is rapidly expanding use of {{ dts2}} for date-sorting in tables, but i was just informed (by Belhalla at wp:ships) that DTS2 is "deprecated". I see that there is a category tag "Templates deprecated since March 25, 2008", on DTS2, but the category link is a red-link. What does that mean, and what does "deprecated" mean? And i have tried some searches, but do not find my way to discussion of deprecating DTS2, so I don't understand what the issue with it is. I happen to prefer the syntax for dts2 entry over dts syntax, and dts2 is now built into a NRHP list-table generator tool that is getting increased usage. Any clarifications would be appreciated. doncram ( talk) 19:36, 7 August 2008 (UTC)
I can see why this template was orphaned; having created it as potentially useful to anyone trying to understand the relationship of past and present Aintree stations I had forgotten to plug it in to anything. Having added a hatnote to Aintree railway station I will try to add similar links to the other stations it features over the next few days. Britmax ( talk) 11:21, 11 May 2009 (UTC)
Well the next few minutes really. I'll remove the tag now. Britmax ( talk) 11:36, 11 May 2009 (UTC)
Concerning the proposed deletion of the {{ CAS registry}} template, I have a more general question about the deletion of templates that were formerly widely used (in this example, the {{ CAS registry}} template was trancluded into ~3000 articles). As discussed here, I expressed a concern that if this template were deleted, then it would compromise the viewing of older versions of articles that transcluded these templates. I don't have any strong objections to deleting the {{ CAS registry}} template (and the closely related {{ enzyme links}}, {{ enzyme references}}, {{ GO code links}} templates). However I wanted to bring up the issue of maintaining the history of articles that translcluded these templates. Any thoughts? Boghog ( talk) 06:22, 5 October 2009 (UTC)
We still use it but we the Users have been busy with othe stuff, school, other wiki articles. House1090 ( talk) 04:45, 3 February 2010 (UTC)
This template was tagged for speedy deletion as deprecated on July 17. As of July 30 however it is now in use at Aquilegia chrysantha. Leaving note here per {{ deprecated}}. Jujutacular talk 16:19, 31 July 2010 (UTC)
This template is a mess up between WP-project and WP-namespace (ie articles). Indeed, as proposed somewhere, TFD-it. - DePiep ( talk) 21:56, 12 August 2010 (UTC)
This is the
talk page for discussing improvements to the
Deprecated and orphaned templates page. |
|
This page was nominated for deletion on 11 August 2007. The result of the discussion was speedy close (bad venue). |
This page was nominated for deletion on 4 January 2014. The result of the discussion was mark as historical. |
These templates are the parts of the categories, Category:Party shortnames templates (India) and Category:Party colours templates (India) which will be using on other templates. Some of them are already part of the Category:LS2004 templates. So, I object of complete deletion of these templates. Regards, Shyam ( T/ C) 02:45, 6 August 2007 (UTC)
How does this process account for templates that have not been transcluded (ie, templates that are substituted)? -- bainer ( talk) 00:38, 12 August 2007 (UTC)
I suggest this page use the wording of WP:PROD as much as possible, to avoid confusion between the two processes. >Radiant< 09:13, 13 August 2007 (UTC)
Since this page "is not a deletion process" but rather "a way to aggregate templates that can be deleted", I suggest moving it to Wikipedia:Deprecated and orphaned templates. As long as it remains a subpage of Wikipedia:Templates for deletion, it will be perceived as a formal deletion process. — Black Falcon ( Talk) 21:05, 15 August 2007 (UTC)
The scope of Category:Deprecated and orphaned templates and Category:Deprecated templates seems to be similar. I would expect that most of the templates in the latter could be transferred to the former for deletion (and perhaps the latter category could be disbanded/deleted). — Black Falcon ( Talk) 00:39, 20 August 2007 (UTC)
Could be used in the Astronomy article. Master of Puppets Care to share? 00:16, 13 November 2007 (UTC)
Template:Deln trk LoPbN Entry served
My recollection is that i never noticed anyone but myself using the template; if there were instances of the template in use when the roughly a thousand pages of LoPbN content and infrastructure were deleted under Deletion Review, some bios on "the deletion track" may have escaped attention, since i was indisposed from even the normal process of following up on them at the time, let alone doing so under the conditions of disruption of the templates function that the LoPbN deletion imposed. But that would be of small moment, and no objection to the template's deletion will come from me.
--
Jerzy•
t 02:59, 19 November 2007 (UTC)
There are currently two sections: "Templates currently marked for deletion" and "Templates ready to be deleted" - What's the difference? — Sebastian 04:22, 20 December 2007 (UTC)
Per the notice sent to me by User:Black Falcon, I have removed the {{deprecated}} tag from this template, as I disagree with the nomination for deletion.
As a member of Canada's military forces, there are times when it is important to me to have a disclaimer that what I am saying is personal opinion and not representative of the Government of Canada. I created the template so that other users who might feel a similar requirement could easily include such a disclaimer. I would be happy to generalize the template so that it could be used by a member of any nation's military. Thanks. ¥ Jacky Tar 05:40, 6 April 2008 (UTC)
Hi -- In wp:NRHP there is rapidly expanding use of {{ dts2}} for date-sorting in tables, but i was just informed (by Belhalla at wp:ships) that DTS2 is "deprecated". I see that there is a category tag "Templates deprecated since March 25, 2008", on DTS2, but the category link is a red-link. What does that mean, and what does "deprecated" mean? And i have tried some searches, but do not find my way to discussion of deprecating DTS2, so I don't understand what the issue with it is. I happen to prefer the syntax for dts2 entry over dts syntax, and dts2 is now built into a NRHP list-table generator tool that is getting increased usage. Any clarifications would be appreciated. doncram ( talk) 19:36, 7 August 2008 (UTC)
I can see why this template was orphaned; having created it as potentially useful to anyone trying to understand the relationship of past and present Aintree stations I had forgotten to plug it in to anything. Having added a hatnote to Aintree railway station I will try to add similar links to the other stations it features over the next few days. Britmax ( talk) 11:21, 11 May 2009 (UTC)
Well the next few minutes really. I'll remove the tag now. Britmax ( talk) 11:36, 11 May 2009 (UTC)
Concerning the proposed deletion of the {{ CAS registry}} template, I have a more general question about the deletion of templates that were formerly widely used (in this example, the {{ CAS registry}} template was trancluded into ~3000 articles). As discussed here, I expressed a concern that if this template were deleted, then it would compromise the viewing of older versions of articles that transcluded these templates. I don't have any strong objections to deleting the {{ CAS registry}} template (and the closely related {{ enzyme links}}, {{ enzyme references}}, {{ GO code links}} templates). However I wanted to bring up the issue of maintaining the history of articles that translcluded these templates. Any thoughts? Boghog ( talk) 06:22, 5 October 2009 (UTC)
We still use it but we the Users have been busy with othe stuff, school, other wiki articles. House1090 ( talk) 04:45, 3 February 2010 (UTC)
This template was tagged for speedy deletion as deprecated on July 17. As of July 30 however it is now in use at Aquilegia chrysantha. Leaving note here per {{ deprecated}}. Jujutacular talk 16:19, 31 July 2010 (UTC)
This template is a mess up between WP-project and WP-namespace (ie articles). Indeed, as proposed somewhere, TFD-it. - DePiep ( talk) 21:56, 12 August 2010 (UTC)