Skepticism Project‑class | |||||||
|
This page was nominated for deletion on October 28, 2006. The result of the discussion was keep. |
|
This page has archives. Sections older than 64 days may be automatically archived by Lowercase sigmabot III when more than 5 sections are present. |
Hey folks! I'm currently working on a draft for an article about David Dees, the conspiracy theory artist. Before I dedicate a lot of time to writing it, I wanted to gauge if people felt like he meets notability guidelines, as well as get feedback on my prospective list of sources (and perhaps see if you all have additional sources I could use).
My plan is to build off of the (sadly somewhat thin) German Wikipedia article on Dees, as well as perhaps using the (not-particularly-encyclopedic) RationalWiki article for some supplementary ideas. In terms of sources, I was planning on using Brad Abraham's short documentary Do You See What I See?, the ADL's 2008 profile on him, and Ashley Feinberg's 2015 Gawker article. The German article has additional sources listed, but I think an editor who's fluent in German or French would be necessary to most accurately cite those.
Any feedback that people could provide would be greatly appreciated! Ithinkiplaygames ( talk) 17:56, 2 January 2024 (UTC)
An arsonist was convicted of setting a number of fires in Italy, but our article seems to give equal weight to the possibility the cause was "unknown" and could have been aliens, demons, conspiracy, or some paranormal cause. - LuckyLouie ( talk) 19:43, 9 February 2024 (UTC)
I have just nominated the UFO convention article for deletion. The conventions listed were mostly not notable and the article has become a place of clutter. Why would someone need to understand what a UFO convention is? Just make a category once you have enough notable conventions? Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/UFO convention I don't feel strongly about this article, I just dislike seeing articles that don't provide content, and not seeing reliable sources to beef up the article. Sgerbic ( talk) 07:21, 25 February 2024 (UTC)
There is a requested move discussion at Talk:Sagan standard#Requested move 12 March 2024 that may be of interest to members of this WikiProject. SilverLocust 💬 19:08, 19 March 2024 (UTC)
There is currently a discussion concerning the question of religion and whether or not it is an appropriate subject for the Fringe Theories Noticeboard. Experienced editors are encouraged to join the conversation. - Ad Orientem ( talk) 19:47, 15 April 2024 (UTC)
Looking for uninvolved editors opinions on the discussion at List of common misconceptions. Conversation seems to have stalled. Rollinginhisgrave ( talk) 14:11, 6 July 2024 (UTC)
Skepticism Project‑class | |||||||
|
This page was nominated for deletion on October 28, 2006. The result of the discussion was keep. |
|
This page has archives. Sections older than 64 days may be automatically archived by Lowercase sigmabot III when more than 5 sections are present. |
Hey folks! I'm currently working on a draft for an article about David Dees, the conspiracy theory artist. Before I dedicate a lot of time to writing it, I wanted to gauge if people felt like he meets notability guidelines, as well as get feedback on my prospective list of sources (and perhaps see if you all have additional sources I could use).
My plan is to build off of the (sadly somewhat thin) German Wikipedia article on Dees, as well as perhaps using the (not-particularly-encyclopedic) RationalWiki article for some supplementary ideas. In terms of sources, I was planning on using Brad Abraham's short documentary Do You See What I See?, the ADL's 2008 profile on him, and Ashley Feinberg's 2015 Gawker article. The German article has additional sources listed, but I think an editor who's fluent in German or French would be necessary to most accurately cite those.
Any feedback that people could provide would be greatly appreciated! Ithinkiplaygames ( talk) 17:56, 2 January 2024 (UTC)
An arsonist was convicted of setting a number of fires in Italy, but our article seems to give equal weight to the possibility the cause was "unknown" and could have been aliens, demons, conspiracy, or some paranormal cause. - LuckyLouie ( talk) 19:43, 9 February 2024 (UTC)
I have just nominated the UFO convention article for deletion. The conventions listed were mostly not notable and the article has become a place of clutter. Why would someone need to understand what a UFO convention is? Just make a category once you have enough notable conventions? Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/UFO convention I don't feel strongly about this article, I just dislike seeing articles that don't provide content, and not seeing reliable sources to beef up the article. Sgerbic ( talk) 07:21, 25 February 2024 (UTC)
There is a requested move discussion at Talk:Sagan standard#Requested move 12 March 2024 that may be of interest to members of this WikiProject. SilverLocust 💬 19:08, 19 March 2024 (UTC)
There is currently a discussion concerning the question of religion and whether or not it is an appropriate subject for the Fringe Theories Noticeboard. Experienced editors are encouraged to join the conversation. - Ad Orientem ( talk) 19:47, 15 April 2024 (UTC)
Looking for uninvolved editors opinions on the discussion at List of common misconceptions. Conversation seems to have stalled. Rollinginhisgrave ( talk) 14:11, 6 July 2024 (UTC)