The following discussions are requested to have community-wide attention:
Should the SpaceX Starship IFT-3 launch be categorized as (in alphabetical order) a failure, partial failure, or success in the infobox? Redraiderengineer ( talk) 14:30, 21 March 2024 (UTC) |
Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Weather/Tornadoes of XXXX criteria
Should the set of criteria (four points) + the rare oddities exception, become the criteria for all Tornadoes of XXXX (ex.
Tornadoes of 2023 &
Tornadoes of 2024) articles?
The Weather Event Writer ( Talk Page) 21:20, 13 March 2024 (UTC) |
Talk:ISO base media file format
Should the infobox indicate that ISO BMFF is an
open format, that it is not an open format, or say nothing about it?
Related RfCs:
Fernando Trebien ( talk) 22:16, 8 March 2024 (UTC) |
Should the infobox indicate that MP4 is an
open format, that it is not an open format, or say nothing about it?
Related RfCs:
Fernando Trebien ( talk) 22:14, 8 March 2024 (UTC) |
Should the definition in the lead section restrict "open file format" to file formats whose specification is available only under open access, or with an open license, or both, or neither? Fernando Trebien ( talk) 22:06, 8 March 2024 (UTC) |
Is Talk:COVID-19_pandemic#Current_consensus #14 still valid?. It says: "Do not mention the theory that the virus was accidentally leaked from a laboratory in the article. (May 2020)" Jtbobwaysf ( talk) 21:02, 4 March 2024 (UTC) |
After doing thorough research, I have found out that the WikiProject for Roads allows 10 significant junctions. Normally, this isn’t an issue but for a highway as long as I-90, there are a lot of junctions and there has been constant edit warring and talk page discussions over what junctions to include. I am proposing the following
Some of these options contradict each other, but feel free to support multiple options that don’t contradict or offer your own opinions. RoadFan294857 ( talk) 23:00, 29 February 2024 (UTC) |
To better structure discussion around this seemingly contentious issue, I think we ought to do this as described at
WP:RFC. Please keep this
civil and show some sympathy towards each other.
Should the sentence "He is considered one of the greatest and most influential scientists in history." be removed from the lead of this article? — Jumbo T ( talk) 13:27, 29 February 2024 (UTC) |
The following discussions are requested to have community-wide attention:
Should the SpaceX Starship IFT-3 launch be categorized as (in alphabetical order) a failure, partial failure, or success in the infobox? Redraiderengineer ( talk) 14:30, 21 March 2024 (UTC) |
Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Weather/Tornadoes of XXXX criteria
Should the set of criteria (four points) + the rare oddities exception, become the criteria for all Tornadoes of XXXX (ex.
Tornadoes of 2023 &
Tornadoes of 2024) articles?
The Weather Event Writer ( Talk Page) 21:20, 13 March 2024 (UTC) |
Talk:ISO base media file format
Should the infobox indicate that ISO BMFF is an
open format, that it is not an open format, or say nothing about it?
Related RfCs:
Fernando Trebien ( talk) 22:16, 8 March 2024 (UTC) |
Should the infobox indicate that MP4 is an
open format, that it is not an open format, or say nothing about it?
Related RfCs:
Fernando Trebien ( talk) 22:14, 8 March 2024 (UTC) |
Should the definition in the lead section restrict "open file format" to file formats whose specification is available only under open access, or with an open license, or both, or neither? Fernando Trebien ( talk) 22:06, 8 March 2024 (UTC) |
Is Talk:COVID-19_pandemic#Current_consensus #14 still valid?. It says: "Do not mention the theory that the virus was accidentally leaked from a laboratory in the article. (May 2020)" Jtbobwaysf ( talk) 21:02, 4 March 2024 (UTC) |
After doing thorough research, I have found out that the WikiProject for Roads allows 10 significant junctions. Normally, this isn’t an issue but for a highway as long as I-90, there are a lot of junctions and there has been constant edit warring and talk page discussions over what junctions to include. I am proposing the following
Some of these options contradict each other, but feel free to support multiple options that don’t contradict or offer your own opinions. RoadFan294857 ( talk) 23:00, 29 February 2024 (UTC) |
To better structure discussion around this seemingly contentious issue, I think we ought to do this as described at
WP:RFC. Please keep this
civil and show some sympathy towards each other.
Should the sentence "He is considered one of the greatest and most influential scientists in history." be removed from the lead of this article? — Jumbo T ( talk) 13:27, 29 February 2024 (UTC) |