This page was nominated for deletion. Please review the prior discussions if you are considering re-nomination: Deletion discussions: Speedy keep, 29 August 2007, see discussion. Speedy keep, 22 January 2007, see discussion. Nomination withdrawn, 20 November 2006, see discussion. Speedy keep, 29 August 2005, see discussion. Keep, 1 July 2005, see discussion. Keep, 12 March 2004, see discussion. Keep, 25 February 2004, see discussion.

This project page does not require a rating on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:

Department of Fun Bottom‑importance This page is supported by the Department of Fun, which aims to provide Wikipedians with fun so that they stay on Wikipedia and keep on improving articles. If you have any ideas, do not hesitate to post them to the discussion page or access our home page to join the Department of Fun.Department of FunWikipedia:Department of FunTemplate:WikiProject Department of FunDepartment of Fun articles Bottom This page has been rated as Bottom-importance on the importance scale.

This page has been cited as a source by a notable professional or academic publication: Cummings, Robert E.: Lazy Virtues: Teaching Writing in the Age of Wikipedia p103, Vanderbilt University Press, 2009. ISBN  0826516165

This page has been cited as a source by a notable professional or academic publication: Joseph Reagle, A Case of Mutual Aid: Wikipedia, Politeness, and Perspective Taking, 2004

This page has been mentioned by multiple media organizations: "Articles of War". Mother Jones. January–February 2007.{{ cite news}}: CS1 maint: date format ( link) David McCandless (August 2010). "Articles of War - Wikipedia's lamest edit wars". Information is Beautiful. Luke Allnutt (13 January 2011). "The Lamest Edit Wars On Wikipedia Ever". Tangled Web, Radio Free Europe / Radio Liberty. Andrew Hendry (9 February 2008). "All you need to know about Wikipedia". PC Advisor. "University Challenge - 2011/2012, Episode 35". University Challenge/ BBC/ ITV Studios. 5 March 2012. Phil Edwards (17 September 2015). "Wikipedia's lamest edit wars show why the site is amazing and infuriating". Vox. Archived from the original on 19 September 2015. Retrieved 19 September 2015. Noam Cohen (7 April 2019). "Want to Know How to Build a Better Democracy? Ask Wikipedia". Wired. Retrieved 8 April 2019. Richard Cooke (February 17, 2020). "Wikipedia Is the Last Best Place on the Internet". Wired. Retrieved February 17, 2020. Ben Lindbergh (January 15, 2021). "The Fight to Win the Pettiest Edit Wars on Wikipedia". The Ringer. Retrieved January 15, 2021.

Archives

Index Archive 1 Archive 2 Archive 3 Archive 4 Archive 5 Archive 6

This page has archives. Sections older than 90 days may be automatically archived by Lowercase sigmabot III.

Hi, I'm a journalist who's working on a story about this page. Would anyone who's active here be interested in answering some questions about it? Thanks in advance for your help! — Preceding unsigned comment added by BenLindbergh ( talk • contribs)

https://cohost.org/arborelia/post/3737501-empty

Revert warring an image caption until it's padlocked counts as lame, right?

-- 155.4.128.189 ( talk) 19:55, 2 December 2023 (UTC) reply

that's hilarious. i'll have to add that sometime. ltb d l ( talk) 06:40, 3 December 2023 (UTC) reply

This feels straight out of Uncyclopedia POSSUM chowg ( talk) 11:17 AM, December 18 2023 (PST)

i have a question: can i add this war? because it's SO LAME, lamest edit war i've seen, but it happened on another wiki...
also a pretty intense one. but really lame. if it happened here, i'd straight up add it. (forgot signature smh) What was the glider's apgcode? ( talk) 21:45, 19 December 2023 (UTC) reply

I read on ANI about a bunch of sock- and/or meat-puppets warring for months by removing information about chairs in sub-Saharan Africa at History of the chair. What heading of LEW would that fall under? QwertyForest ( talk) 21:15, 29 May 2024 (UTC) reply

I just found out about this ridiculous dispute, because switching two words broke Wikipedia:Getting to Philosophy for a large number of articles, and there have been around FIFTY edits about this. I find this truly lame. Wilh3lm ^Talk 17:09, 24 June 2024 (UTC) reply

that is incredible. thank you. ltb d l ( talk) 02:23, 25 June 2024 (UTC) reply

should this be added? 29,940 words, and It's still going on... I just think it's ridiculous, that's all Cal3000000 ( talk) 19:05, 6 July 2024 (UTC) reply