Material from
Wikipedia:Editing restrictions was split to other pages. The former page's
history now serves to
provide attribution for that content in the latter pages, and it must not be deleted so long as the latter pages exist. Please leave this template in place to link the article histories and preserve this attribution.
|
|
|||||
A discussion is taking place to address the redirect Wikipedia:Topic bans. The discussion will occur at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2020 September 22#Wikipedia:Topic bans until a consensus is reached, and readers of this page are welcome to contribute to the discussion. 𝟙𝟤𝟯𝟺𝐪𝑤𝒆𝓇𝟷𝟮𝟥𝟜𝓺𝔴𝕖𝖗𝟰 ( 𝗍𝗮𝘭𝙠) 15:51, 22 September 2020 (UTC)
The entry about the ArbCom-imposed unblock conditions for SethRuebens are incorrect. It should read:
SethRuebens is unblocked subject to a (1) one-account restriction, (2) a ban from directly editing Britannia (TV series), and (3) a requirement to disclose any relevant conflicts of interest.
– LaundryPizza03 ( d c̄) 14:22, 5 April 2021 (UTC)
The recent unblock conditions imposed on Uhooep ( talk · contribs) ( motion) hasn't been listed yet. – LaundryPizza03 ( d c̄) 08:29, 17 June 2021 (UTC)
See Wikipedia:Bots/Requests for approval/ProcBot 9. ProcrastinatingReader ( talk) 18:40, 16 August 2021 (UTC)
Hi. I was unblocked well over a year ago by Voice of Clam without any editing restrictions after it was noted here that various admins had been discussing my unblock (as well as some possible restrictions), but as you can see Miniapolis and OhKayeSierra supported my unblock, resulting in the unrestricted unblock message you saw on my talk page from VOC. However, some old past restrictions for an outdated unblock from over 3 years ago remain posted on this page where I was supposed to be monitored by 5 albert square, North8000, and Betty Logan, but I think all of those users will say those restrictions no longer apply, and that none of them has expected to perform any of that type of monitoring for those restrictions since my unrestricted unblock by VOC over a year ago. I'm requesting this outdated information be removed because it gives the false impression that I'm still under some kind of restrictions when I have not been for more than a year. Thanks. Huggums537 ( talk) 00:35, 13 March 2022 (UTC)
P.S. You can also see here in my unblock log that I was unblocked over a year ago with no restrictions, so please remove the outdated data. Thanks. Huggums537 ( talk) 01:09, 13 March 2022 (UTC)
Also, I think N8's suggestion is clear that if 5as first have removal of the posting, then he would continue to watch me for another 30 days beyond that even though it would not be needed in his opinion. The reason I think it is important to clarify this distinction is because I want to make sure any potential uninvolved editors who might be reading this understand that the correct interpretation of this discussion is that the terms were clear and everyone agrees with them. Huggums537 ( talk) 09:48, 21 March 2022 (UTC)
I monitored for 31 days. Editor has been active including in the subject areas with zero issues. I removed the entry. Happy editing! North8000 ( talk) 17:01, 25 April 2022 (UTC)
I've run into about a half-dozen cases of editors being topic banned (mostly by ArbCom) that were never logged here as they were banned before this page existed. The bans are ancient but still active. Their bans were instead logged on the talk pages of the topics they were banned from. I'd like to remove the documentation on those talk pages, as I'm trying to clean up/remove uses of the messagebox
class (see
MediaWiki talk:Common.css/to do for background). For reference, these are the ones I found:
Is there any issue adding them here? Izno ( talk) 20:37, 27 April 2022 (UTC)
Some lists of sanctions include several sanctions which have expired, including Wikipedia:Editing_restrictions/Archive/Placed_by_the_Arbitration_Committee which will need to be remediated by an Arbcom clerk, and many remain in the list even after they havve expired. I am opening a request at WP:BOTREQ to have a bot automatically remove expired sanctions from the table. – LaundryPizza03 ( d c̄) 12:14, 1 June 2022 (UTC)
Just now I had difficulty finding the Wikipedia article on " Wikipedia:Protection policy". I think a link to that other article should be included in this article. The last line of this article seems to say that users should NOT add material at the end. Therefore, I'm placing it at the beginning. I think this information should be in this article someplace. I think it would be better at the end. However, if that's not feasible, then at least put it someplace. The beginning seems to me to be a second-best choice. Thanks DavidMCEddy ( talk) 06:33, 17 August 2022 (UTC)
Smallbones's topic ban entry from Robert Prechter should link to Robert Prechter's article. Actually, we should have similar links for all notable topics covered in a topic ban. – LaundryPizza03 ( d c̄) 09:24, 12 February 2023 (UTC)
There is a discussion at VPI that relates to this page. BilledMammal ( talk) 10:16, 2 July 2023 (UTC)
I would like to have my interaction ban with User:AldezD expunged, as he left wikipedia about six months ago. Thank you! ← Baseball Bugs What's up, Doc? carrots→ 16:59, 18 August 2023 (UTC)
Please advise how I request the lifting of the indefinite topic ban restriction imposed in September of 2022. The last thing I want to do is to offend people by posting this request improperly. Thank you. Fabrickator ( talk) 06:57, 29 September 2023 (UTC)
The entry for Kolya Butternut ( talk · contribs) is missing the username field. – LaundryPizza03 ( d c̄) 22:44, 17 November 2023 (UTC)
Apparently, user:Abd has died; as such, is there any point to keeping the Abd/ William M. Connolley interaction ban on here? DS ( talk) 03:01, 6 June 2024 (UTC)
Material from
Wikipedia:Editing restrictions was split to other pages. The former page's
history now serves to
provide attribution for that content in the latter pages, and it must not be deleted so long as the latter pages exist. Please leave this template in place to link the article histories and preserve this attribution.
|
|
|||||
A discussion is taking place to address the redirect Wikipedia:Topic bans. The discussion will occur at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2020 September 22#Wikipedia:Topic bans until a consensus is reached, and readers of this page are welcome to contribute to the discussion. 𝟙𝟤𝟯𝟺𝐪𝑤𝒆𝓇𝟷𝟮𝟥𝟜𝓺𝔴𝕖𝖗𝟰 ( 𝗍𝗮𝘭𝙠) 15:51, 22 September 2020 (UTC)
The entry about the ArbCom-imposed unblock conditions for SethRuebens are incorrect. It should read:
SethRuebens is unblocked subject to a (1) one-account restriction, (2) a ban from directly editing Britannia (TV series), and (3) a requirement to disclose any relevant conflicts of interest.
– LaundryPizza03 ( d c̄) 14:22, 5 April 2021 (UTC)
The recent unblock conditions imposed on Uhooep ( talk · contribs) ( motion) hasn't been listed yet. – LaundryPizza03 ( d c̄) 08:29, 17 June 2021 (UTC)
See Wikipedia:Bots/Requests for approval/ProcBot 9. ProcrastinatingReader ( talk) 18:40, 16 August 2021 (UTC)
Hi. I was unblocked well over a year ago by Voice of Clam without any editing restrictions after it was noted here that various admins had been discussing my unblock (as well as some possible restrictions), but as you can see Miniapolis and OhKayeSierra supported my unblock, resulting in the unrestricted unblock message you saw on my talk page from VOC. However, some old past restrictions for an outdated unblock from over 3 years ago remain posted on this page where I was supposed to be monitored by 5 albert square, North8000, and Betty Logan, but I think all of those users will say those restrictions no longer apply, and that none of them has expected to perform any of that type of monitoring for those restrictions since my unrestricted unblock by VOC over a year ago. I'm requesting this outdated information be removed because it gives the false impression that I'm still under some kind of restrictions when I have not been for more than a year. Thanks. Huggums537 ( talk) 00:35, 13 March 2022 (UTC)
P.S. You can also see here in my unblock log that I was unblocked over a year ago with no restrictions, so please remove the outdated data. Thanks. Huggums537 ( talk) 01:09, 13 March 2022 (UTC)
Also, I think N8's suggestion is clear that if 5as first have removal of the posting, then he would continue to watch me for another 30 days beyond that even though it would not be needed in his opinion. The reason I think it is important to clarify this distinction is because I want to make sure any potential uninvolved editors who might be reading this understand that the correct interpretation of this discussion is that the terms were clear and everyone agrees with them. Huggums537 ( talk) 09:48, 21 March 2022 (UTC)
I monitored for 31 days. Editor has been active including in the subject areas with zero issues. I removed the entry. Happy editing! North8000 ( talk) 17:01, 25 April 2022 (UTC)
I've run into about a half-dozen cases of editors being topic banned (mostly by ArbCom) that were never logged here as they were banned before this page existed. The bans are ancient but still active. Their bans were instead logged on the talk pages of the topics they were banned from. I'd like to remove the documentation on those talk pages, as I'm trying to clean up/remove uses of the messagebox
class (see
MediaWiki talk:Common.css/to do for background). For reference, these are the ones I found:
Is there any issue adding them here? Izno ( talk) 20:37, 27 April 2022 (UTC)
Some lists of sanctions include several sanctions which have expired, including Wikipedia:Editing_restrictions/Archive/Placed_by_the_Arbitration_Committee which will need to be remediated by an Arbcom clerk, and many remain in the list even after they havve expired. I am opening a request at WP:BOTREQ to have a bot automatically remove expired sanctions from the table. – LaundryPizza03 ( d c̄) 12:14, 1 June 2022 (UTC)
Just now I had difficulty finding the Wikipedia article on " Wikipedia:Protection policy". I think a link to that other article should be included in this article. The last line of this article seems to say that users should NOT add material at the end. Therefore, I'm placing it at the beginning. I think this information should be in this article someplace. I think it would be better at the end. However, if that's not feasible, then at least put it someplace. The beginning seems to me to be a second-best choice. Thanks DavidMCEddy ( talk) 06:33, 17 August 2022 (UTC)
Smallbones's topic ban entry from Robert Prechter should link to Robert Prechter's article. Actually, we should have similar links for all notable topics covered in a topic ban. – LaundryPizza03 ( d c̄) 09:24, 12 February 2023 (UTC)
There is a discussion at VPI that relates to this page. BilledMammal ( talk) 10:16, 2 July 2023 (UTC)
I would like to have my interaction ban with User:AldezD expunged, as he left wikipedia about six months ago. Thank you! ← Baseball Bugs What's up, Doc? carrots→ 16:59, 18 August 2023 (UTC)
Please advise how I request the lifting of the indefinite topic ban restriction imposed in September of 2022. The last thing I want to do is to offend people by posting this request improperly. Thank you. Fabrickator ( talk) 06:57, 29 September 2023 (UTC)
The entry for Kolya Butternut ( talk · contribs) is missing the username field. – LaundryPizza03 ( d c̄) 22:44, 17 November 2023 (UTC)
Apparently, user:Abd has died; as such, is there any point to keeping the Abd/ William M. Connolley interaction ban on here? DS ( talk) 03:01, 6 June 2024 (UTC)