Wikipedia:Resolving disputes contains the official policy on dispute resolution for English Wikipedia. Arbitration is generally the last step for user conduct-related disputes that cannot be resolved through discussion on
noticeboards or by
asking the community its opinion on the matter.
This page is the central location for discussing the various requests for arbitration processes. Requesting that a case be taken up here isn't likely to help you, but editors active in the dispute resolution community should be able to assist. |
Arbitration talk page archives |
---|
WT:RFAR archives (2004–2009) |
Various archives (2004–2011) |
Ongoing WT:A/R archives (2009–) |
WT:RFAR subpages |
Archive of prior proceedings |
Amendment request: Conduct in deletion-related editing was declined. In that amendment request, I raised concerns about TenPoundHammer's blank-and-redirects (BLARs) and asked whether to request a BLAR topic ban in a separate amendment request. I did not receive an answer to that question. @ Guerillero: ( link), @ Firefly: ( link), and @ Aoidh: ( link) mentioned concerns about the redirect in opposing the relaxing of the topic ban, while @ Primefac: ( link) had "no major concerns" about the redirects. Did the Arbitration Committee consider the BLAR topic ban request and decide against it? I would like advice about whether to file a separate amendment request for the BLAR topic ban. I considered asking the community to review the redirect issue but have not because this is a conduct dispute that previously reached arbitration. Cunard ( talk) 22:02, 20 April 2024 (UTC)
Hoping to avoid a whole thing, and maybe this has been addressed already. WP:CTOP says there has to be a clear consensus (bolding in original) to overturn a CTOP sanction, but Wikipedia:Arbitration Committee/Procedures#Enforcement says "clear and substantial". Is a bolded clear substantial? Has the threshold changed? ScottishFinnishRadish ( talk) 15:39, 31 May 2024 (UTC)
clear and substantialrequirement applies to non-CT enforcement? Dreamy Jazz talk to me | my contributions 13:55, 1 June 2024 (UTC)
I've just filed a request for clarification, using the built-in process at WP:ARCA. The {{ Arbitration clarification request}} template tells you to remove certain lines if the request does not concern a specific case, but if you don't give a title paramater, it puts code in the section header, and if you create a title but remove the other two parameters, it auto-generates them anyway, meaning you have to remove them again after posting, as I just did. Seems like this could use some tweaking to make it more user-friendly. Just Step Sideways from this world ..... today 22:44, 4 June 2024 (UTC)
When was it decided that the number of edits needed to edit the talk page should be the same as to edit the article? It doesn't make any sense.
/info/en/?search=Wikipedia:Requests_for_page_protection/Edit 181.98.62.149 ( talk) 13:14, 6 June 2024 (UTC)
Wikipedia:Resolving disputes contains the official policy on dispute resolution for English Wikipedia. Arbitration is generally the last step for user conduct-related disputes that cannot be resolved through discussion on
noticeboards or by
asking the community its opinion on the matter.
This page is the central location for discussing the various requests for arbitration processes. Requesting that a case be taken up here isn't likely to help you, but editors active in the dispute resolution community should be able to assist. |
Arbitration talk page archives |
---|
WT:RFAR archives (2004–2009) |
Various archives (2004–2011) |
Ongoing WT:A/R archives (2009–) |
WT:RFAR subpages |
Archive of prior proceedings |
Amendment request: Conduct in deletion-related editing was declined. In that amendment request, I raised concerns about TenPoundHammer's blank-and-redirects (BLARs) and asked whether to request a BLAR topic ban in a separate amendment request. I did not receive an answer to that question. @ Guerillero: ( link), @ Firefly: ( link), and @ Aoidh: ( link) mentioned concerns about the redirect in opposing the relaxing of the topic ban, while @ Primefac: ( link) had "no major concerns" about the redirects. Did the Arbitration Committee consider the BLAR topic ban request and decide against it? I would like advice about whether to file a separate amendment request for the BLAR topic ban. I considered asking the community to review the redirect issue but have not because this is a conduct dispute that previously reached arbitration. Cunard ( talk) 22:02, 20 April 2024 (UTC)
Hoping to avoid a whole thing, and maybe this has been addressed already. WP:CTOP says there has to be a clear consensus (bolding in original) to overturn a CTOP sanction, but Wikipedia:Arbitration Committee/Procedures#Enforcement says "clear and substantial". Is a bolded clear substantial? Has the threshold changed? ScottishFinnishRadish ( talk) 15:39, 31 May 2024 (UTC)
clear and substantialrequirement applies to non-CT enforcement? Dreamy Jazz talk to me | my contributions 13:55, 1 June 2024 (UTC)
I've just filed a request for clarification, using the built-in process at WP:ARCA. The {{ Arbitration clarification request}} template tells you to remove certain lines if the request does not concern a specific case, but if you don't give a title paramater, it puts code in the section header, and if you create a title but remove the other two parameters, it auto-generates them anyway, meaning you have to remove them again after posting, as I just did. Seems like this could use some tweaking to make it more user-friendly. Just Step Sideways from this world ..... today 22:44, 4 June 2024 (UTC)
When was it decided that the number of edits needed to edit the talk page should be the same as to edit the article? It doesn't make any sense.
/info/en/?search=Wikipedia:Requests_for_page_protection/Edit 181.98.62.149 ( talk) 13:14, 6 June 2024 (UTC)