![]() |
![]() | This case is now closed and pages relating to it may no longer be watched
|
Case clerks: L235 ( Talk) & Amortias ( Talk) Drafting arbitrators: GorillaWarfare ( Talk) & Euryalus ( Talk)
Wikipedia Arbitration |
---|
![]() |
|
Track related changes |
Behaviour on this page: Arbitration case pages exist to assist the Arbitration Committee in arriving at a fair, well-informed decision. You are required to act with appropriate decorum during this case. While grievances must often be aired during a case, you are expected to air them without being rude or hostile, and to respond calmly to allegations against you. Accusations of misbehaviour posted in this case must be proven with clear evidence (and otherwise not made at all). Editors who conduct themselves inappropriately during a case may be sanctioned by an arbitrator, clerk, or functionary, without further warning, by being banned from further participation in the case, or being blocked altogether. Personal attacks against other users, including arbitrators or the clerks, will be met with sanctions. Behavior during a case may also be considered by the committee in arriving at a final decision.
I'd like to suggest that a hatnote be added to this casepage to say, This arbitration case concerns topics related to the War of the Pacific in South America (1879-83), not the Pacific War of the Second World War. The current case title, while precise, may alarm editors concerned about disputes regarding coverage of the Western Pacific, which is a topic area that has seen many ArbCom cases in the past. Deryck C. 10:44, 8 February 2017 (UTC)
![]() |
![]() | This case is now closed and pages relating to it may no longer be watched
|
Case clerks: L235 ( Talk) & Amortias ( Talk) Drafting arbitrators: GorillaWarfare ( Talk) & Euryalus ( Talk)
Wikipedia Arbitration |
---|
![]() |
|
Track related changes |
Behaviour on this page: Arbitration case pages exist to assist the Arbitration Committee in arriving at a fair, well-informed decision. You are required to act with appropriate decorum during this case. While grievances must often be aired during a case, you are expected to air them without being rude or hostile, and to respond calmly to allegations against you. Accusations of misbehaviour posted in this case must be proven with clear evidence (and otherwise not made at all). Editors who conduct themselves inappropriately during a case may be sanctioned by an arbitrator, clerk, or functionary, without further warning, by being banned from further participation in the case, or being blocked altogether. Personal attacks against other users, including arbitrators or the clerks, will be met with sanctions. Behavior during a case may also be considered by the committee in arriving at a final decision.
I'd like to suggest that a hatnote be added to this casepage to say, This arbitration case concerns topics related to the War of the Pacific in South America (1879-83), not the Pacific War of the Second World War. The current case title, while precise, may alarm editors concerned about disputes regarding coverage of the Western Pacific, which is a topic area that has seen many ArbCom cases in the past. Deryck C. 10:44, 8 February 2017 (UTC)