This is the
talk page for discussing improvements to the
Administrators' noticeboard page. |
|
![]() |
|
![]() | To help centralise discussions and keep related topics together, several subpages of Wikipedia talk:Administrators' noticeboard redirect here. |
![]() | This is not the page to report problems to administrators, or discuss administrative issues.
This page is for discussion of the Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard page (and some of its subpages, including /Incidents).
|
![]() | This noticeboard has been
mentioned by multiple media organizations:
|
Index
|
|||||||||||||||||
This page has archives. Sections older than 8 days may be automatically archived by ClueBot III when more than 4 sections are present. |
While searching through the archives of this talk page, I discovered, by accident, that AN and AN/I archives actually have automatically created talk pages on them ( example), and those talk pages contain a table with an index of all the discussions on the archive page, with indicators of length (bytes) for each section (including sub-sections). From a glance you can see how long or short a thread is, as well as if there are additional sub-topics within it, and you can read all the thread names much more quickly and easily than through the table of contents on the archive page.
How is this incredibly useful feature not mentioned anywhere on the banner or on info pages?!? — AP 499D25 (talk) 14:30, 27 June 2024 (UTC)
The edit notice currently reads:
This noticeboard is for issues affecting administrators generally – announcements, notifications, information, and other matters of general administrator interest.
If your post is about a specific problem you have (a dispute, user, help request, or other narrow issue needing an administrator), you should post it at the Administrators' noticeboard for incidents (ANI) instead. Thank you.
I think it would be more accurate to reword it:
This noticeboard is for general administrative issues – announcements, notifications, information, and other matters of general administration interest.
If your post is about a specific problem you have (a dispute, user, help request, or other narrow issue needing an administrator), you should post it at the Administrators' noticeboard for incidents (ANI) instead. Thank you.
The current wording gives the misleading impression of the purpose of this board (the title has a related issue; I believe it would be better titled WP:Administration noticeboard, but that's a different discussion). BilledMammal ( talk) 07:13, 3 July 2024 (UTC)
The article is fully protected, go work out your content problems with other editors |
---|
The following discussion has been closed. Please do not modify it. |
Tupac Page can now be edited by everyone; it wasn't like that before. Previously, only administrators and users with permission could edit it (like me). This rule needs to be reinstated, or it will be edited every day Pier1999 ( talk) 13:20, 13 July 2024 (UTC)
|
I found it surprising that Wikipedia talk:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents redirects to Wikipedia talk:Administrators' noticeboard, but Wikipedia talk:Administrators' noticeboard/Header and Wikipedia talk:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents/Header don't.
Should these talk pages of header subpages for AN and ANI be redirected to WT:AN? There are no talk page archives there, which makes creating these redirects easier. The older discussions could there be archived to archive pages here. The latest one is Archive 17, but time-wise more appropriate earlier archives could be found. — andrybak ( talk) 19:19, 17 July 2024 (UTC)
This is the
talk page for discussing improvements to the
Administrators' noticeboard page. |
|
![]() |
|
![]() |
|
![]() | To help centralise discussions and keep related topics together, several subpages of Wikipedia talk:Administrators' noticeboard redirect here. |
![]() | This is not the page to report problems to administrators, or discuss administrative issues.
This page is for discussion of the Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard page (and some of its subpages, including /Incidents).
|
![]() | This noticeboard has been
mentioned by multiple media organizations:
|
Index
|
|||||||||||||||||
This page has archives. Sections older than 8 days may be automatically archived by ClueBot III when more than 4 sections are present. |
While searching through the archives of this talk page, I discovered, by accident, that AN and AN/I archives actually have automatically created talk pages on them ( example), and those talk pages contain a table with an index of all the discussions on the archive page, with indicators of length (bytes) for each section (including sub-sections). From a glance you can see how long or short a thread is, as well as if there are additional sub-topics within it, and you can read all the thread names much more quickly and easily than through the table of contents on the archive page.
How is this incredibly useful feature not mentioned anywhere on the banner or on info pages?!? — AP 499D25 (talk) 14:30, 27 June 2024 (UTC)
The edit notice currently reads:
This noticeboard is for issues affecting administrators generally – announcements, notifications, information, and other matters of general administrator interest.
If your post is about a specific problem you have (a dispute, user, help request, or other narrow issue needing an administrator), you should post it at the Administrators' noticeboard for incidents (ANI) instead. Thank you.
I think it would be more accurate to reword it:
This noticeboard is for general administrative issues – announcements, notifications, information, and other matters of general administration interest.
If your post is about a specific problem you have (a dispute, user, help request, or other narrow issue needing an administrator), you should post it at the Administrators' noticeboard for incidents (ANI) instead. Thank you.
The current wording gives the misleading impression of the purpose of this board (the title has a related issue; I believe it would be better titled WP:Administration noticeboard, but that's a different discussion). BilledMammal ( talk) 07:13, 3 July 2024 (UTC)
The article is fully protected, go work out your content problems with other editors |
---|
The following discussion has been closed. Please do not modify it. |
Tupac Page can now be edited by everyone; it wasn't like that before. Previously, only administrators and users with permission could edit it (like me). This rule needs to be reinstated, or it will be edited every day Pier1999 ( talk) 13:20, 13 July 2024 (UTC)
|
I found it surprising that Wikipedia talk:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents redirects to Wikipedia talk:Administrators' noticeboard, but Wikipedia talk:Administrators' noticeboard/Header and Wikipedia talk:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents/Header don't.
Should these talk pages of header subpages for AN and ANI be redirected to WT:AN? There are no talk page archives there, which makes creating these redirects easier. The older discussions could there be archived to archive pages here. The latest one is Archive 17, but time-wise more appropriate earlier archives could be found. — andrybak ( talk) 19:19, 17 July 2024 (UTC)