- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's
talk page or in a
deletion review).
The result of the discussion was keep (nomination withdrawn).
(non-admin closure)
lettherebedarklight,
晚安,
おやすみ,
ping me when replying 10:13, 14 September 2022 (UTC)
reply
Navbox with no transclusions. –
Jonesey95 (
talk) 19:12, 4 September 2022 (UTC)
reply
- Keep I've added it to the mainspace article. This is a useful navbox. It just needs to be reorganized to be easily read/navigate using. --
WikiCleanerMan (
talk) 18:20, 6 September 2022 (UTC)
reply
- Keep as the nomination reason (being unused) is now moot. — Ceso femmuin mbolgaig mbung,
mello
hi! (
投稿) 18:07, 10 September 2022 (UTC)
reply
- Withdrawn now that there are transclusions. –
Jonesey95 (
talk) 04:23, 13 September 2022 (UTC)
reply
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's
talk page or in a
deletion review).
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's
talk page or in a
deletion review).
The result of the discussion was relisted on
2022 September 12.
✗
plicit 11:58, 12 September 2022 (UTC)
reply
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's
talk page or in a
deletion review).
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's
talk page or in a
deletion review).
The result of the discussion was relisted on
2022 September 12.
✗
plicit 11:57, 12 September 2022 (UTC)
reply
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's
talk page or in a
deletion review).
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's
talk page or in a
deletion review).
The result of the discussion was Delete; deleted as
G7 by
Fastily (
talk ·
contribs ·
blocks ·
protections ·
deletions ·
page moves ·
rights ·
RfA)
AnomieBOT
⚡ 16:13, 6 September 2022 (UTC)
reply
No transclusions. Based on who the creating editor is, I suspect that this template has been replaced by functionality in a module. –
Jonesey95 (
talk) 19:05, 4 September 2022 (UTC)
reply
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's
talk page or in a
deletion review).
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's
talk page or in a
deletion review).
The result of the discussion was delete.
✗
plicit 11:53, 11 September 2022 (UTC)
reply
No transclusions, documentation, or incoming links. –
Jonesey95 (
talk) 19:04, 4 September 2022 (UTC)
reply
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's
talk page or in a
deletion review).
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's
talk page or in a
deletion review).
The result of the discussion was delete.
✗
plicit 11:53, 11 September 2022 (UTC)
reply
No transclusions, documentation, or incoming links. –
Jonesey95 (
talk) 19:03, 4 September 2022 (UTC)
reply
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's
talk page or in a
deletion review).
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's
talk page or in a
deletion review).
The result of the discussion was delete.
Plastikspork
―Œ(talk) 14:11, 14 September 2022 (UTC)
reply
Navbox whose item links are all redirects to the main article. No transclusions. –
Jonesey95 (
talk) 19:02, 4 September 2022 (UTC)
reply
- Delete Looks redundant at this moment.
D4iNa4 (
talk) 07:07, 5 September 2022 (UTC)
reply
- Merge the list of singles into the singer's article (or a discography subpage), and then delete. Navboxes should be for navigating between articles, and there are no articles for this to navigate between. — Ceso femmuin mbolgaig mbung,
mello
hi! (
投稿) 18:09, 10 September 2022 (UTC)
reply
- As a way of implementing the merge proposed above, I have copied the unsourced list of singles from this navbox to
Talk:Sanchez (singer). If sources can be found, the singles can be added to the article. I think that this TFD is ready to close now. –
Jonesey95 (
talk) 04:26, 13 September 2022 (UTC)
reply
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's
talk page or in a
deletion review).
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's
talk page or in a
deletion review).
The result of the discussion was delete.
✗
plicit 11:53, 11 September 2022 (UTC)
reply
No transclusions, documentation, or incoming links. –
Jonesey95 (
talk) 19:01, 4 September 2022 (UTC)
reply
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's
talk page or in a
deletion review).
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's
talk page or in a
deletion review).
The result of the discussion was delete.
✗
plicit 11:53, 11 September 2022 (UTC)
reply
No transclusions. The
relevant article uses a module directly and works fine. –
Jonesey95 (
talk) 18:57, 4 September 2022 (UTC)
reply
- Delete per nom. –
Pbrks (
t •
c) 18:32, 5 September 2022 (UTC)
reply
- Delete as superseded. — Ceso femmuin mbolgaig mbung,
mello
hi! (
投稿) 18:10, 10 September 2022 (UTC)
reply
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's
talk page or in a
deletion review).
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's
talk page or in a
deletion review).
The result of the discussion was delete.
✗
plicit 11:54, 11 September 2022 (UTC)
reply
No transclusions, documentation, categories, or incoming links. –
Jonesey95 (
talk) 18:53, 4 September 2022 (UTC)
reply
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's
talk page or in a
deletion review).
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's
talk page or in a
deletion review).
The result of the discussion was delete.
✗
plicit 11:55, 11 September 2022 (UTC)
reply
Navbox with no transclusions, no main article, and links to generic articles, not about specific 2009 versions of the linked events. –
Jonesey95 (
talk) 18:51, 4 September 2022 (UTC)
reply
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's
talk page or in a
deletion review).
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's
talk page or in a
deletion review).
The result of the discussion was delete.
✗
plicit 11:55, 11 September 2022 (UTC)
reply
No transclusions, documentation, or incoming links. –
Jonesey95 (
talk) 18:50, 4 September 2022 (UTC)
reply
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's
talk page or in a
deletion review).
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's
talk page or in a
deletion review).
The result of the discussion was delete.
✗
plicit 11:55, 11 September 2022 (UTC)
reply
No transclusions, documentation, or incoming links. –
Jonesey95 (
talk) 18:49, 4 September 2022 (UTC)
reply
- Speedy delete:
WP:G7 I created this to be used as a weightlifting template but it ended up being unnecessary.
Tartar
Torte 20:29, 5 September 2022 (UTC)
reply
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's
talk page or in a
deletion review).
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's
talk page or in a
deletion review).
The result of the discussion was keep.
✗
plicit 11:59, 12 September 2022 (UTC)
reply
No links to articles in the navbox. Delete or userfy. –
Jonesey95 (
talk) 18:46, 4 September 2022 (UTC)
reply
- Keep. Being used on two articles, and that will expand to 41 in the next few months as the games approach closer. No point in deleting now and creating it soon after.
Sportsfan 1234 (
talk) 21:42, 4 September 2022 (UTC)
reply
- Delete. Too soon. –
Aidan721 (
talk) 01:32, 5 September 2022 (UTC)
reply
- Keep or userify -- agree there's no point in deleting now and creating again.
Caleb Stanford (
talk) 03:07, 5 September 2022 (UTC)
reply
Comment Now nine articles linked on the template.
Sportsfan 1234 (
talk) 03:43, 11 September 2022 (UTC)
reply
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's
talk page or in a
deletion review).
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's
talk page or in a
deletion review).
The result of the discussion was delete.
✗
plicit 11:56, 11 September 2022 (UTC)
reply
No transclusions, documentation, or incoming links. –
Jonesey95 (
talk) 18:46, 4 September 2022 (UTC)
reply
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's
talk page or in a
deletion review).
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's
talk page or in a
deletion review).
The result of the discussion was delete.
✗
plicit 11:56, 11 September 2022 (UTC)
reply
No transclusions, documentation, or incoming links. –
Jonesey95 (
talk) 18:45, 4 September 2022 (UTC)
reply
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's
talk page or in a
deletion review).
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's
talk page or in a
deletion review).
The result of the discussion was delete.
✗
plicit 11:56, 11 September 2022 (UTC)
reply
No transclusions, documentation, or incoming links. –
Jonesey95 (
talk) 18:44, 4 September 2022 (UTC)
reply
- ? - - - -
T e r g y t h e u s e r- - - - 23:30, 4 September 2022 (UTC)
reply
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's
talk page or in a
deletion review).
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's
talk page or in a
deletion review).
The result of the discussion was delete.
✗
plicit 11:56, 11 September 2022 (UTC)
reply
No transclusions, documentation, categories, or incoming links. –
Jonesey95 (
talk) 18:44, 4 September 2022 (UTC)
reply
- Delete per nomination. --
WikiCleanerMan (
talk) 18:41, 6 September 2022 (UTC)
reply
- Delete as completely useless. Virtually everyone I've seen who uses massviews as evidence in requested moves discussions just copies the URL directly from their browser and pastes with the default external link markup. — Ceso femmuin mbolgaig mbung,
mello
hi! (
投稿) 18:12, 10 September 2022 (UTC)
reply
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's
talk page or in a
deletion review).
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's
talk page or in a
deletion review).
The result of the discussion was delete.
✗
plicit 11:56, 11 September 2022 (UTC)
reply
No transclusions, documentation, categories, or incoming links. –
Jonesey95 (
talk) 18:42, 4 September 2022 (UTC)
reply
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's
talk page or in a
deletion review).
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's
talk page or in a
deletion review).
The result of the discussion was delete.
✗
plicit 11:57, 11 September 2022 (UTC)
reply
This template was used in
only one article before it was
substed to fix a problem. Not needed. –
Jonesey95 (
talk) 18:41, 4 September 2022 (UTC)
reply
- Delete as unused.
Caleb Stanford (
talk) 03:06, 5 September 2022 (UTC)
reply
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's
talk page or in a
deletion review).
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's
talk page or in a
deletion review).
The result of the discussion was delete.
✗
plicit 11:57, 11 September 2022 (UTC)
reply
No transclusions. This is likely to be redundant to one or more of the infoboxes in
Category:Religion and belief infobox templates or its subcategories. –
Jonesey95 (
talk) 18:35, 4 September 2022 (UTC)
reply
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's
talk page or in a
deletion review).
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's
talk page or in a
deletion review).
The result of the discussion was delete.
✗
plicit 11:57, 11 September 2022 (UTC)
reply
No transclusions, documentation, categories, or incoming links. –
Jonesey95 (
talk) 18:27, 4 September 2022 (UTC)
reply
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's
talk page or in a
deletion review).
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's
talk page or in a
deletion review).
The result of the discussion was delete.
✗
plicit 11:58, 11 September 2022 (UTC)
reply
No transclusions, incoming links, or documentation. –
Jonesey95 (
talk) 18:23, 4 September 2022 (UTC)
reply
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's
talk page or in a
deletion review).
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's
talk page or in a
deletion review).
The result of the discussion was keep.
✗
plicit 12:00, 12 September 2022 (UTC)
reply
No transclusions, documentation, or categories. It appears that this template was proposed as a workaround for perceived problems with {{
fraction}}, but it has not been adopted in the 11 months since its creation. –
Jonesey95 (
talk) 18:22, 4 September 2022 (UTC)
reply
- Hmm, I might have forgotten to put that in some places where it is appropriate. I'm going back now and switching articles that need it. --
Beland (
talk) 23:48, 4 September 2022 (UTC)
reply
- OK, I think I've gotten all of them, or at least all of them found by "insource:/\{\{cite[^\}]+\{\{frac/". --
Beland (
talk) 06:52, 5 September 2022 (UTC)
reply
- Comment - What is the problem with {{
fraction}} that this template avoids? --
Sable232 (
talk) 14:12, 5 September 2022 (UTC)
reply
- It puts some unwanted HTML in the text, which causes errors like "{{
cite web}}: templatestyles stripmarker in |title= at position 1". There is some ambition to make the standard templates not do that, but it's yet to actually happen. The discussion was at:
Help talk:Citation_Style 1/Archive 80#HTML markup. --
Beland (
talk) 18:29, 9 September 2022 (UTC)
reply
- Keep based on the above explanation, but I would strongly recommend that there be some documentation for the template that explains its function. --
Sable232 (
talk) 21:47, 9 September 2022 (UTC)
reply
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's
talk page or in a
deletion review).
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's
talk page or in a
deletion review).
The result of the discussion was delete.
✗
plicit 11:58, 11 September 2022 (UTC)
reply
Based on the
previous discussion, it appears that this template was used in one infobox. It is no longer used after
this edit by
Hike395. –
Jonesey95 (
talk) 18:18, 4 September 2022 (UTC)
reply
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's
talk page or in a
deletion review).
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's
talk page or in a
deletion review).
The result of the discussion was delete.
✗
plicit 11:24, 11 September 2022 (UTC)
reply
No transclusions. This article content should live at
Banaras Hindu University or be deleted. –
Jonesey95 (
talk) 18:14, 4 September 2022 (UTC)
reply
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's
talk page or in a
deletion review).
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's
talk page or in a
deletion review).
The result of the discussion was delete.
✗
plicit 11:24, 11 September 2022 (UTC)
reply
No transclusions. –
Jonesey95 (
talk) 18:13, 4 September 2022 (UTC)
reply
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's
talk page or in a
deletion review).
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's
talk page or in a
deletion review).
The result of the discussion was delete.
✗
plicit 11:25, 11 September 2022 (UTC)
reply
No transclusions. The body of this navbox contains no links to articles. –
Jonesey95 (
talk) 17:16, 4 September 2022 (UTC)
reply
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's
talk page or in a
deletion review).
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's
talk page or in a
deletion review).
The result of the discussion was delete.
✗
plicit 11:25, 11 September 2022 (UTC)
reply
No transclusions, documentation, or incoming links. Probably replaced by a subpage of
Module:Adjacent stations. –
Jonesey95 (
talk) 17:15, 4 September 2022 (UTC)
reply
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's
talk page or in a
deletion review).
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's
talk page or in a
deletion review).
The result of the discussion was relisted on
2022 September 12.
✗
plicit 12:01, 12 September 2022 (UTC)
reply
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's
talk page or in a
deletion review).
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's
talk page or in a
deletion review).
The result of the discussion was delete.
Plastikspork
―Œ(talk) 03:12, 11 September 2022 (UTC)
reply
No transclusions. Replaced by
Module:Adjacent stations/Circumvesuviana. –
Jonesey95 (
talk) 17:09, 4 September 2022 (UTC)
reply
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's
talk page or in a
deletion review).
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's
talk page or in a
deletion review).
The result of the discussion was delete.
✗
plicit 11:24, 11 September 2022 (UTC)
reply
No transclusions, documentation, categories, or incoming links. –
Jonesey95 (
talk) 17:06, 4 September 2022 (UTC)
reply
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's
talk page or in a
deletion review).
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's
talk page or in a
deletion review).
The result of the discussion was delete.
✗
plicit 11:23, 11 September 2022 (UTC)
reply
No main article. Delete, or merge into {{
Revolution Pro Wrestling}}. –
Jonesey95 (
talk) 17:04, 4 September 2022 (UTC)
reply
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's
talk page or in a
deletion review).
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's
talk page or in a
deletion review).
The result of the discussion was delete.
✗
plicit 11:23, 11 September 2022 (UTC)
reply
Lists only two entries.
Caleb Stanford (
talk) 16:25, 4 September 2022 (UTC)
reply
- Support deletion – It's the end of the line, it was fun while it lasted. I wonder how long the last two articles will last. ~
Maplestrip/Mable (
chat) 08:37, 5 September 2022 (UTC)
reply
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's
talk page or in a
deletion review).
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's
talk page or in a
deletion review).
The result of the discussion was delete.
✗
plicit 11:21, 11 September 2022 (UTC)
reply
No transclusions. –
Pbrks (
t •
c) 15:45, 4 September 2022 (UTC)
reply
- Delete per nomination. –
Aidan721 (
talk) 01:31, 5 September 2022 (UTC)
reply
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's
talk page or in a
deletion review).
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's
talk page or in a
deletion review).
The result of the discussion was delete.
✗
plicit 11:20, 11 September 2022 (UTC)
reply
Redundant to {{
10TeamBracket}}. –
Pbrks (
t •
c) 15:43, 4 September 2022 (UTC)
reply
- Delete per nomination. –
Aidan721 (
talk) 01:31, 5 September 2022 (UTC)
reply
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's
talk page or in a
deletion review).
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's
talk page or in a
deletion review).
The result of the discussion was delete.
✗
plicit 11:20, 11 September 2022 (UTC)
reply
No transclusions. –
Pbrks (
t •
c) 15:28, 4 September 2022 (UTC)
reply
- Delete per nomination. –
Aidan721 (
talk) 01:31, 5 September 2022 (UTC)
reply
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's
talk page or in a
deletion review).
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's
talk page or in a
deletion review).
The result of the discussion was delete.
✗
plicit 11:20, 11 September 2022 (UTC)
reply
No transclusions. –
Pbrks (
t •
c) 14:12, 4 September 2022 (UTC)
reply
- Delete per nomination. –
Aidan721 (
talk) 01:30, 5 September 2022 (UTC)
reply
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's
talk page or in a
deletion review).
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's
talk page or in a
deletion review).
The result of the discussion was delete.
✗
plicit 11:20, 11 September 2022 (UTC)
reply
Only two articles actually exist that belong on this navbox.
★Trekker (
talk) 14:08, 4 September 2022 (UTC)
reply
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's
talk page or in a
deletion review).
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's
talk page or in a
deletion review).
The result of the discussion was delete.
✗
plicit 11:14, 11 September 2022 (UTC)
reply
No transclusions. Replaced by various generic brackets of the same format. –
Pbrks (
t •
c) 03:13, 4 September 2022 (UTC)
reply
- No objection to deletion.
Howard the Duck (
talk) 04:19, 4 September 2022 (UTC)
reply
- Delete per nomination. –
Aidan721 (
talk) 01:30, 5 September 2022 (UTC)
reply
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's
talk page or in a
deletion review).
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's
talk page or in a
deletion review).
The result of the discussion was relisted on
2022 September 11.
✗
plicit 11:16, 11 September 2022 (UTC)
reply
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's
talk page or in a
deletion review).
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's
talk page or in a
deletion review).
The result of the discussion was relisted on
2022 September 11.
✗
plicit 11:17, 11 September 2022 (UTC)
reply
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's
talk page or in a
deletion review).
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's
talk page or in a
deletion review).
The result of the discussion was relisted on
2022 September 11.
✗
plicit 11:17, 11 September 2022 (UTC)
reply
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's
talk page or in a
deletion review).
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's
talk page or in a
deletion review).
The result of the discussion was delete.
✗
plicit 00:28, 11 September 2022 (UTC)
reply
Redundant to {{
16TeamBracket}}. –
Aidan721 (
talk) 00:07, 4 September 2022 (UTC)
reply
- Delete per nom. –
Pbrks (
t •
c) 04:39, 4 September 2022 (UTC)
reply
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's
talk page or in a
deletion review).