From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

September 12

Template:CFB Last Meeting

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. plicit 23:46, 19 September 2022 (UTC) reply

This template is used to make tables for the "game summaries" sections of college football team season articles that detail the previous winner and overall series record between the two teams. Per discussion at Wikipedia talk:WikiProject College football/Archive 24#Overall record / Last meeting / Result tables, a consensus was reached that such tables—typically rendered without a template—were unnecessary cruft. Since this content is not needed, this template should be deleted. Jweiss11 ( talk) 20:41, 12 September 2022 (UTC) reply

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:Hasidic dynasties/stub

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. plicit 23:36, 19 September 2022 (UTC) reply

Note that this is not a "-stub" tagging template. This appears to be a subst-only template for creating new Hasidic dynasty pages, but I believe that given its very bare-bones nature, it has outlived its usefulness. There are no links to this template from any project pages, so it is unlikely that it is being used. Editors would be much better served by adapting one of the many developed articles listed at {{ Hasidic dynasties by country of ancestral origin}}. – Jonesey95 ( talk) 17:41, 12 September 2022 (UTC) reply

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:Coelomate basic

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. plicit 23:37, 19 September 2022 (UTC) reply

Single-use template containing article content. Subst and delete. – Jonesey95 ( talk) 17:12, 12 September 2022 (UTC) reply

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:Bierstadt Lake

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. plicit 23:39, 19 September 2022 (UTC) reply

Single-use template containing article content. This table was initially written in HTML markup, which was a bit daunting. I have rewritten it using normal wikitable code, and it should be fine to subst and delete now. – Jonesey95 ( talk) 17:09, 12 September 2022 (UTC) reply

That sounds lovely!– CaroleHenson ( talk) 18:18, 12 September 2022 (UTC) reply
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:Klein model history

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. plicit 23:41, 19 September 2022 (UTC) reply

Single-use template containing only article content and no template parameters. Subst and delete. – Jonesey95 ( talk) 17:00, 12 September 2022 (UTC) reply

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:Civil disobedience

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. plicit 23:42, 19 September 2022 (UTC) reply

This template seems to have no use, as everything inside of it is a redlink. Explodicator7331 ( talk) 15:24, 12 September 2022 (UTC) reply

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:FCC LMS letter

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was relisted on 2022 September 21. Primefac ( talk) 11:05, 21 September 2022 (UTC) reply

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:Wl

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was userfy for now to User:DMacks/Template:Wl; if and when it reaches a usable level, it should have a name that indicates its functionality. Primefac ( talk) 11:10, 21 September 2022 (UTC) reply

No transclusions, documentation, or categories. Inscrutable template name. – Jonesey95 ( talk) 19:11, 4 September 2022 (UTC) reply

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, plicit 11:58, 12 September 2022 (UTC) reply

  • At a minimum rename, probably at a maximum delete as unused. Moving is fine. -- Izno ( talk) 01:25, 17 September 2022 (UTC) reply
  • move to userspace or rename. Frietjes ( talk) 23:34, 19 September 2022 (UTC) reply
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:Tldp

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. plicit 03:32, 19 September 2022 (UTC) reply

No transclusions. – Jonesey95 ( talk) 19:07, 4 September 2022 (UTC) reply

There are 142 potential uses. That isn't a huge number, but it's reasonable. No idea why there are currently zero (other than fifteen years of bitrot). Chris Cunningham (user:thumperward) ( talk) 19:47, 4 September 2022 (UTC) reply

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, plicit 11:57, 12 September 2022 (UTC) reply

  • Delete as unused. -- Izno ( talk) 01:26, 17 September 2022 (UTC) reply
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:PlusLiga Seasons

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. plicit 12:11, 19 September 2022 (UTC) reply

The template which includes PlusLiga seasons: Template:Polish Men's Volleyball League already exists, next to the PlusLiga teams. Maister1921 ( talk) 07:49, 12 September 2022 (UTC) reply

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:12TeamBracket-ExtraSemi

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. plicit 12:07, 19 September 2022 (UTC) reply

Redundant to {{ 12TeamBracket-LateBye}}. –  Pbrks ( t •  c) 04:31, 12 September 2022 (UTC) reply

Delete per nomination. – Aidan721 ( talk) 18:22, 12 September 2022 (UTC) reply
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:12TeamBracket-2Elim-A

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. plicit 03:31, 19 September 2022 (UTC) reply

No transclusions. – Aidan721 ( talk) 01:46, 12 September 2022 (UTC) reply

  • Delete per nom. –  Pbrks ( t •  c) 05:35, 12 September 2022 (UTC) reply
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:12TeamRoundRobin

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. plicit 03:31, 19 September 2022 (UTC) reply

No transclusions. – Aidan721 ( talk) 01:06, 12 September 2022 (UTC) reply

  • Delete per nom. –  Pbrks ( t •  c) 05:35, 12 September 2022 (UTC) reply
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

September 12

Template:CFB Last Meeting

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. plicit 23:46, 19 September 2022 (UTC) reply

This template is used to make tables for the "game summaries" sections of college football team season articles that detail the previous winner and overall series record between the two teams. Per discussion at Wikipedia talk:WikiProject College football/Archive 24#Overall record / Last meeting / Result tables, a consensus was reached that such tables—typically rendered without a template—were unnecessary cruft. Since this content is not needed, this template should be deleted. Jweiss11 ( talk) 20:41, 12 September 2022 (UTC) reply

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:Hasidic dynasties/stub

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. plicit 23:36, 19 September 2022 (UTC) reply

Note that this is not a "-stub" tagging template. This appears to be a subst-only template for creating new Hasidic dynasty pages, but I believe that given its very bare-bones nature, it has outlived its usefulness. There are no links to this template from any project pages, so it is unlikely that it is being used. Editors would be much better served by adapting one of the many developed articles listed at {{ Hasidic dynasties by country of ancestral origin}}. – Jonesey95 ( talk) 17:41, 12 September 2022 (UTC) reply

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:Coelomate basic

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. plicit 23:37, 19 September 2022 (UTC) reply

Single-use template containing article content. Subst and delete. – Jonesey95 ( talk) 17:12, 12 September 2022 (UTC) reply

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:Bierstadt Lake

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. plicit 23:39, 19 September 2022 (UTC) reply

Single-use template containing article content. This table was initially written in HTML markup, which was a bit daunting. I have rewritten it using normal wikitable code, and it should be fine to subst and delete now. – Jonesey95 ( talk) 17:09, 12 September 2022 (UTC) reply

That sounds lovely!– CaroleHenson ( talk) 18:18, 12 September 2022 (UTC) reply
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:Klein model history

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. plicit 23:41, 19 September 2022 (UTC) reply

Single-use template containing only article content and no template parameters. Subst and delete. – Jonesey95 ( talk) 17:00, 12 September 2022 (UTC) reply

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:Civil disobedience

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. plicit 23:42, 19 September 2022 (UTC) reply

This template seems to have no use, as everything inside of it is a redlink. Explodicator7331 ( talk) 15:24, 12 September 2022 (UTC) reply

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:FCC LMS letter

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was relisted on 2022 September 21. Primefac ( talk) 11:05, 21 September 2022 (UTC) reply

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:Wl

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was userfy for now to User:DMacks/Template:Wl; if and when it reaches a usable level, it should have a name that indicates its functionality. Primefac ( talk) 11:10, 21 September 2022 (UTC) reply

No transclusions, documentation, or categories. Inscrutable template name. – Jonesey95 ( talk) 19:11, 4 September 2022 (UTC) reply

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, plicit 11:58, 12 September 2022 (UTC) reply

  • At a minimum rename, probably at a maximum delete as unused. Moving is fine. -- Izno ( talk) 01:25, 17 September 2022 (UTC) reply
  • move to userspace or rename. Frietjes ( talk) 23:34, 19 September 2022 (UTC) reply
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:Tldp

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. plicit 03:32, 19 September 2022 (UTC) reply

No transclusions. – Jonesey95 ( talk) 19:07, 4 September 2022 (UTC) reply

There are 142 potential uses. That isn't a huge number, but it's reasonable. No idea why there are currently zero (other than fifteen years of bitrot). Chris Cunningham (user:thumperward) ( talk) 19:47, 4 September 2022 (UTC) reply

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, plicit 11:57, 12 September 2022 (UTC) reply

  • Delete as unused. -- Izno ( talk) 01:26, 17 September 2022 (UTC) reply
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:PlusLiga Seasons

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. plicit 12:11, 19 September 2022 (UTC) reply

The template which includes PlusLiga seasons: Template:Polish Men's Volleyball League already exists, next to the PlusLiga teams. Maister1921 ( talk) 07:49, 12 September 2022 (UTC) reply

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:12TeamBracket-ExtraSemi

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. plicit 12:07, 19 September 2022 (UTC) reply

Redundant to {{ 12TeamBracket-LateBye}}. –  Pbrks ( t •  c) 04:31, 12 September 2022 (UTC) reply

Delete per nomination. – Aidan721 ( talk) 18:22, 12 September 2022 (UTC) reply
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:12TeamBracket-2Elim-A

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. plicit 03:31, 19 September 2022 (UTC) reply

No transclusions. – Aidan721 ( talk) 01:46, 12 September 2022 (UTC) reply

  • Delete per nom. –  Pbrks ( t •  c) 05:35, 12 September 2022 (UTC) reply
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:12TeamRoundRobin

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. plicit 03:31, 19 September 2022 (UTC) reply

No transclusions. – Aidan721 ( talk) 01:06, 12 September 2022 (UTC) reply

  • Delete per nom. –  Pbrks ( t •  c) 05:35, 12 September 2022 (UTC) reply
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Videos

Youtube | Vimeo | Bing

Websites

Google | Yahoo | Bing

Encyclopedia

Google | Yahoo | Bing

Facebook