March 7
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's
talk page or in a
deletion review).
The result of the discussion was Relisting
here. ~
Rob
Talk 02:14, 17 March 2016 (UTC)
reply
Propose merging
Template:WikiProject Handball with
Template:WikiProject Sports.
WikiProject Handball transcludes WikiProject Sports with the parameter Handball=yes, but WikiProject Sports does not have a Handball parameter.
GoingBatty (
talk) 18:33, 7 March 2016 (UTC)
reply
- Apparently I created this many years ago as a redirect. No objection to it returning to same as long as this is done in such a way as to allow "handball" to be broken out in future whenever the handball fans get sufficiently organised to have their own sports subproject. Globally handball is pretty big, so we should allow for the possibility that its fans will eventually organise here.
Ϣere
SpielChequers 20:45, 7 March 2016 (UTC)
reply
- Looks like our assumption was that the WP Sports template would mimic the behavior of e.g.
Template:WikiProject Africa. So can someone with spare time just implement a stub of that on WP Sports instead? No links to 'task forces' or 'portals', just the indicator which sport it's about, like the indicator for |auto=. --
Joy [shallot] (
talk) 21:20, 7 March 2016 (UTC)
reply
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's
talk page or in a
deletion review).
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's
talk page or in a
deletion review).
The result of the discussion was delete.
(non-admin closure)
Primefac (
talk) 01:30, 16 March 2016 (UTC)
reply
unneeded since we already have
Template:Magical Mystery Tour.
Frietjes (
talk) 17:36, 7 March 2016 (UTC)
reply
- Delete as redundant per nom
—PC
-XT
+ 18:53, 15 March 2016 (UTC)
reply
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's
talk page or in a
deletion review).
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's
talk page or in a
deletion review).
The result of the discussion was delete.
(non-admin closure)
Primefac (
talk) 01:48, 16 March 2016 (UTC)
reply
only used in one article, and for good reason, since most of the songs were not written for this compilation album. if someone wants to know the other tracks on the album, then can, ... , click on the link for the album.
Frietjes (
talk) 17:31, 7 March 2016 (UTC)
reply
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's
talk page or in a
deletion review).
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's
talk page or in a
deletion review).
The result of the discussion was keep.
(non-admin closure)
sst✈ 08:40, 15 March 2016 (UTC)
reply
This template is used to insert an image instead of text. This
violates the Manual of Style and makes articles less accessible for the visually impaired. Regards,
James(
talk/
contribs) 01:09, 7 March 2016 (UTC)
reply
- Merge into {{
rail-interchange}}.
Useddenim (
talk) 01:24, 7 March 2016 (UTC)
reply
- Question: how many of the transclusions are into Navboxes and
route diagrams, where the use of icons is perfectly acceptable?
Useddenim (
talk) 01:30, 7 March 2016 (UTC)
reply
- Keep Per the last sentence of the MOS image section. "Any important textual information in an image should also appear in the image's alt text, caption, or other nearby text." --
TJH2018 (
talk) 16:20, 7 March 2016 (UTC)
reply
- Keep This is not even "textual information" in the strict sense. –
Finnusertop (
talk ⋅
contribs) 16:35, 7 March 2016 (UTC)
reply
- Keep Precedent: see
Template:Rail-interchange/doc/US,
Template:Rail-interchange/doc/UK,
Template:Rail-interchange/doc/CA,
Template:Rail-interchange/doc/AU, etc. for other English-speaking examples, plus every foreign railroad and metro --
Mjdestroyerofworlds (
talk) 21:40, 7 March 2016 (UTC)
reply
- Keep – really, don't we have more important things to do than this?!... --
IJBall (
contribs •
talk) 23:34, 7 March 2016 (UTC)
reply
- Keep. Precedent, use in navboxes and other such areas. If it's misused in article body text, fix it there. But the exact same template is also used in completely valid locations and deleting the entire template is overkill and incorrect. The proposed seems to have not
done the background checks needed.
oknazevad (
talk) 21:41, 8 March 2016 (UTC)
reply
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's
talk page or in a
deletion review).
"Radiotelevision" navigational boxes
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's
talk page or in a
deletion review).
The result of the discussion was delete all.
(non-admin closure)
sst✈ 08:47, 15 March 2016 (UTC)
reply
Unused and pointless navigational boxes. These templates just group together some other navboxes. The latter are sufficient on their own to provide navigation. --
NSH002 (
talk) 00:42, 7 March 2016 (UTC)
reply
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's
talk page or in a
deletion review).