The result of the debate was Delete. IceKarma ॐ 07:46, 22 June 2006 (UTC)
Template:Requestrewrite (
|
talk |
history |
links |
watch |
logs)
Tagged for TfD since December 9, but I can't find any mention in the December logs. No inclusions at the moment, but given it's a maintenance template that shouldn't be too surprising. It's only linked to from 2 pages, so it hasn't been well advertised. Neutral
SeventyThree(
Talk) 23:33, 14 June 2006 (UTC)
The result of the debate was speedily deleted by Nickptar. Pagra shtak 22:49, 16 June 2006 (UTC)
Template:Cite isbn=0-521-58519-8 (
|
talk |
history |
links |
watch |
logs)
Probably created by mistake, uses {{
cite book}} for one specific book. Isn't used in any articles, only on a talk page where a user says "Sorry I didn't notice the template sandbox before I made this"
AlbinoMonkey (
Talk) 12:45, 14 June 2006 (UTC)
The result of the debate was Keep. IceKarma ॐ 07:47, 22 June 2006 (UTC)
Template:DisputedAssertion (
|
talk |
history |
links |
watch |
logs)
Redundant with
Template:Dubious, except that Dubious's talk page link defaults to section "Disputed". This one's does not. This template uses a picture icon that is not clear scaled down to this size and the meaning would not be known by a newbie. Dubious is also much easier to type. Delete after orphaning to Template:Dubious (not much more than 5 pages that use it) to prevent wiki markup clutter, otherwise redirect.
Invitatious 00:05, 14 June 2006 (UTC)
{{dubious|talk page section name}}
, or in the case where there is no talk page section, {{dubious}}
(section Dubious), or {{dubious| }}
(no specific section). Delete after orphaning as I said in the nomination.
Invitatious 12:42, 15 June 2006 (UTC)
The result of the debate was Delete. IceKarma ॐ 07:46, 22 June 2006 (UTC)
Template:Requestrewrite (
|
talk |
history |
links |
watch |
logs)
Tagged for TfD since December 9, but I can't find any mention in the December logs. No inclusions at the moment, but given it's a maintenance template that shouldn't be too surprising. It's only linked to from 2 pages, so it hasn't been well advertised. Neutral
SeventyThree(
Talk) 23:33, 14 June 2006 (UTC)
The result of the debate was speedily deleted by Nickptar. Pagra shtak 22:49, 16 June 2006 (UTC)
Template:Cite isbn=0-521-58519-8 (
|
talk |
history |
links |
watch |
logs)
Probably created by mistake, uses {{
cite book}} for one specific book. Isn't used in any articles, only on a talk page where a user says "Sorry I didn't notice the template sandbox before I made this"
AlbinoMonkey (
Talk) 12:45, 14 June 2006 (UTC)
The result of the debate was Keep. IceKarma ॐ 07:47, 22 June 2006 (UTC)
Template:DisputedAssertion (
|
talk |
history |
links |
watch |
logs)
Redundant with
Template:Dubious, except that Dubious's talk page link defaults to section "Disputed". This one's does not. This template uses a picture icon that is not clear scaled down to this size and the meaning would not be known by a newbie. Dubious is also much easier to type. Delete after orphaning to Template:Dubious (not much more than 5 pages that use it) to prevent wiki markup clutter, otherwise redirect.
Invitatious 00:05, 14 June 2006 (UTC)
{{dubious|talk page section name}}
, or in the case where there is no talk page section, {{dubious}}
(section Dubious), or {{dubious| }}
(no specific section). Delete after orphaning as I said in the nomination.
Invitatious 12:42, 15 June 2006 (UTC)