The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was disambiguate. I've drafted a DAB at First dog, to which I've retargeted these two titles; I will as a common-sense action (not per se part of this close) also retarget First Dog there. -- Tamzin ^{cetacean needed} (she|they|xe) 00:57, 23 July 2022 (UTC) reply

• The first dog → Bo (dog)  ( talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure:  keep/ retarget/ delete ] 

• The First Dog → Bo (dog)  ( talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure:  keep/ retarget/ delete ] 

Along with the other redirect, The first dog, these should be retargeted to United States presidential pets. Obama is not the only President to have had a dog. TraderCharlotte ( talk) 21:13, 8 July 2022 (UTC) reply

Those dogs may have been the most important in one country, but they weren't the first. Domestication of the dog#Morphological divergence covers earlier dogs. Certes ( talk) 21:53, 8 July 2022 (UTC) reply

• Dismabiguate to the two targets suggested here ("US pets" and "dog domestication") -- 64.229.88.43 ( talk) 02:41, 9 July 2022 (UTC) reply
• Retarget to United States presidential pets, with a hatnote to Domestication of the dog#Morphological divergence. — Ceso femmuin mbolgaig mbung, mello hi! ( 投稿) 21:15, 12 July 2022 (UTC) reply
• Disambiguate per 64. The dab page should probably be at First dog per WP:DABNAME. Dogs of the First Family of the United States are not the only ones known as "First Dogs"; the media also call state governor's dogs like Sutter Brown and Baxter LePage by that title. Also the US is not the only country in the world with a First Family who keeps pet dogs either [1]. When other country's First Dogs meet WP:DABMENTION they can be added to the dab page too. 61.239.39.90 ( talk) 00:06, 13 July 2022 (UTC) reply

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: Relisting to add The first dog which was also intended to be discussed by the nom.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, CycloneYoris ^talk! 23:16, 15 July 2022 (UTC) reply

• Disambig per 61. See also Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2022 July 16#First cat. Thryduulf ( talk) 08:42, 16 July 2022 (UTC) reply
• Disambiguate jointly with first dog and capitalisation variants, there's also First Dog on the Moon. — Kusma ( talk) 12:36, 16 July 2022 (UTC) reply

If the consensus is to Disambiguate I would consider First dog and First Dog to be uncontroversial followups.-- 67.70.24.37 ( talk) 18:09, 16 July 2022 (UTC) reply

• Disambiguate per 61. - Presidentman talk · contribs ( Talkback) 15:51, 17 July 2022 (UTC) reply

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was disambiguate. If I've made any errors in math terminology in the DAB page, please correct them. -- Tamzin ^{cetacean needed} (she|they|xe) 19:59, 28 July 2022 (UTC) reply

• Complex algebra → Field of sets  ( talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure:  keep/ retarget/ delete ] 

Confusing: Probalbly, most people searching this phrase would search algebra over the complex numbers. D.Lazard ( talk) 19:44, 1 July 2022 (UTC) reply

• Retarget per nominator. Also, I think readers are also looking for complex numbers that explain more basic topics, so I suggest adding a hat note. -- SilverMatsu ( talk) 00:13, 2 July 2022 (UTC) reply
• Expand into its own article if possible. The complex numbers are extremely widespread and important in mathematics, and the article can describe the principles of field algebra as applied to the complex numbers specifically. ChromaNebula (talk) 04:28, 3 July 2022 (UTC) reply

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: Relisted due to a suggestion to create an article also appearing.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, — Ceso femmuin mbolgaig mbung, mello hi! ( 投稿) 19:53, 8 July 2022 (UTC) reply

• Comment Apparently, "complex" is an archaic term for subgroup, and the current target describes algebra of subgroups. The far more common modern usage is algebra on complex numbers (in the ${\displaystyle x+iy}$ sense). Certes ( talk) 22:06, 8 July 2022 (UTC) reply

  @ Certes According to Complex#Mathematics, a complex is just an element of a field/algebra of sets. Considering that subgroups are not closed under complements and unions, I'm not sure where you are getting that definition from. 1234qwer 1234qwer 4 11:41, 23 July 2022 (UTC) reply

  Perhaps I've oversimplified or simply misunderstood what the article was trying to say. However, the main point is that the term is ambiguous, and many readers who are not set theory specialists would think of algebra involving ${\displaystyle {\sqrt {-1}}}$. Certes ( talk) 12:23, 23 July 2022 (UTC) reply

• Until a new article is ready, see if a disambiguation is feasible between the current target's context as explained by Certes, the nominated suggestion, and complex numbers per SilverMatsu. Jay (talk) 04:22, 15 July 2022 (UTC) reply

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, CycloneYoris ^talk! 23:15, 15 July 2022 (UTC) reply

Disambiguate per above. Not sure if an article on algebraic properties of the complex numbers would warrant an article separate from the one on complex numbers, but I suggest it be called less ambiguously regardless. 1234qwer 1234qwer 4 11:43, 23 July 2022 (UTC) reply

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was delete. -- Tamzin ^{cetacean needed} (she|they|xe) 22:28, 22 July 2022 (UTC) reply

• "Prison tatoo → Prison tattooing  ( talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure:  keep/ retarget/ delete ] 

This is a malformed redirect. The single quotation mark makes it an unlikely search term. ― Susmuffin  ^Talk 22:11, 15 July 2022 (UTC) reply

• Delete per nom. Not useful. BD2412 T 22:50, 15 July 2022 (UTC) reply
• Delete. Improbable and probably a mistake on the creator's part. CLYDE FRANKLIN 23:07, 15 July 2022 (UTC) reply
• Delete: two errors. Shhhnotsoloud ( talk) 10:01, 16 July 2022 (UTC) reply
• Delete while I can see missing the t in tattoo as a plausible mistake the singular quotation mark isn’t.-- 67.70.24.37 ( talk) 20:52, 16 July 2022 (UTC) reply
• Delete as uselessly malformed. — Ceso femmuin mbolgaig mbung, mello hi! ( 投稿) 16:30, 22 July 2022 (UTC) reply

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was keep. _signed, Rosguill ^talk 20:45, 22 July 2022 (UTC) reply

• Harvest moon → Full moon#Harvest moon  ( talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure:  keep/ retarget/ delete ] 

Dozens of potentials, strong argument that the current target isn't even the primary (as this is now the name of an entire video game genre). Recommend moving the dab page to here. Chris Cunningham (user:thumperward) ( talk) 19:42, 15 July 2022 (UTC) reply

• Keep. This seems like a clear application of WP:DIFFCAPS: the redirect is at harvest moon and the disambiguation page is at Harvest Moon. The astronomical event is the only item on the disambiguation page that isn't a proper name, so the redirect isn't ambiguous. - Eureka Lott 20:07, 15 July 2022 (UTC) reply
• Keep. The current target is the primary topic for this capitalisation. Shhhnotsoloud ( talk) 10:00, 16 July 2022 (UTC) reply

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was delete. _signed, Rosguill ^talk 20:44, 22 July 2022 (UTC) reply

• Mawsim (Weather) → Season  ( talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure:  keep/ retarget/ delete ] 

Deletion.

1. IT SERVES NO PURPOSE: it's an Arabic word meaning many things, mainly "season", which hasn't entered English.
2. There is a Wiktionary entry for the word (written in Arabic, true), see here.
3. We have Mawsim (disambiguation). The Wiktionary entry is linked there.
4. It's wrong in terms of the stated meaning, the main one being "season" and none being "weather".
5. It's formally wrong: "Weather" should be with lower-case w, but that's soo secondary. Arminden ( talk) 16:08, 15 July 2022 (UTC) reply

• Delete as an implausible search term. Rubbish computer (Ping me or leave a message on my talk page) 17:54, 15 July 2022 (UTC) reply
• Comment: I've now added the RfD tag to this redirect since it wasn't properly tagged. CycloneYoris ^talk! 18:35, 15 July 2022 (UTC) reply
• Delete as an insignificant foreign-language translation of a common word. — Ceso femmuin mbolgaig mbung, mello hi! ( 投稿) 23:39, 15 July 2022 (UTC) reply
• Delete per several of the nom's reasons. I'm not sure Mawsim (disambiguation) is a valid page either. Shhhnotsoloud ( talk) 09:58, 16 July 2022 (UTC) reply
• Delete. It's improbable, and isn't mentioned at the disambiguation. CLYDE FRANKLIN 16:48, 22 July 2022 (UTC) reply

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was speedy delete as vandalism under the G3 criterion. Creator has declined to explain herself despite a request on her talkpage, and has continued to edit, so I will take that as an acknowledgment that this redirect serves no non-vandalistic purpose. -- Tamzin ^{cetacean needed} (she|they|xe) 22:18, 21 July 2022 (UTC) reply

• Bush Dick Incident → Presidency of George W. Bush  ( talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure:  keep/ retarget/ delete ] 

Not mentioned at target, delete unless a justification can be provided. _signed, Rosguill ^talk 15:17, 15 July 2022 (UTC) reply

• Deleteper nom. While there are multiple instances of the word "Dick" at the target, all of them relate to Dick Cheney (Bush's vice president) and none in relation to a specific incident that might plausibly bear the latter's name. There are a few web hits but none that are both clearly relevant and referring to a specific incident, the closest being this Reddit thread where this redirect is referenced in a thread of GPT2 bots talking to each other (at least I think that's what it is). So, not only is it not mentioned at the target, I can't even work out where to start looking for a mention under a slightly different name. Thryduulf ( talk) 15:56, 15 July 2022 (UTC) reply
  • Comment: the only alt-wording remotely possible "Bush Duck" somehow referring to the shoeing incident. Drdpw ( talk) 21:07, 15 July 2022 (UTC) reply
• Delete per nom. Not mentioned at the target and no web hits referring to a specific incident. Drdpw ( talk) 16:19, 15 July 2022 (UTC) reply
• Delete as incomprehensible and probably intargetable. — Ceso femmuin mbolgaig mbung, mello hi! ( 投稿) 00:01, 16 July 2022 (UTC) reply
• Perhaps related to [2]? I have half a mind to just delete this as vandalism. -- Tamzin ^{cetacean needed} (she|they|xe) 06:15, 17 July 2022 (UTC) reply

  @ StrexcorpEmployee: Great username, but could you please explain this redirect? -- Tamzin ^{cetacean needed} (she|they|xe) 08:09, 17 July 2022 (UTC) reply

  @ Tamzin I believe that post-dates the creation of the redirect here so not the origin of it. Thryduulf ( talk) 10:14, 17 July 2022 (UTC) reply

  @ Thryduulf: Looks to me like the post is March and the redirect is June. Or am I misreading something? -- Tamzin ^{cetacean needed} (she|they|xe) 10:22, 17 July 2022 (UTC) reply

  no you're right, it was me that was misreading things. Thryduulf ( talk) 11:15, 17 July 2022 (UTC) reply

• Delete: I am fairly certain that this redirect is a dick joke that plays on the names of George W. Bush and Dick Cheney. Beyond that, it makes no sense. ― Susmuffin  ^Talk 11:21, 17 July 2022 (UTC) reply
• Delete. Improbable, no mention at target, and it's hard to WP:AGF when the creator has this long of a record of warnings. CLYDE FRANKLIN 18:06, 21 July 2022 (UTC) reply

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was delete. -- Tavix ^{( talk)} 15:45, 24 July 2022 (UTC) reply

• Split reins controversy → September 2021 Haitian migrant photo controversy  ( talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure:  keep/ retarget/ delete ] 

No mention of "split reins" at the target. Searching the phrase online doesn't return any meaningful results. Delete unless a justification can be provided. _signed, Rosguill ^talk 15:07, 15 July 2022 (UTC) reply

• See here [3] for mention of split reins at the time and here [4]for the summary of the government report on the incident mentioning split reins. The redirect doesn't strike me as particularly useful and can probably be deleted.-- Jahaza ( talk) 10:15, 16 July 2022 (UTC) reply

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was keep. (non-admin closure) — Ceso femmuin mbolgaig mbung, mello hi! ( 投稿) 22:05, 18 July 2022 (UTC) reply

• 2022−23 ACF Fiorentina season → 2022–23 ACF Fiorentina season  ( talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure:  keep/ retarget/ delete ] 

This uses a minus sign ( U+2212, −, not the common hyphen-minus) in lieu of an en dash (–). Not a plausible search and will clutter search results. ComplexRational ( talk) 12:39, 8 July 2022 (UTC) reply

• Delete: I can't imagine anyone using − in their search. Tartar Torte 18:41, 8 July 2022 (UTC) reply
• Keep per K4; as an {{ R from move}} it's received about 8 pageviews a day since it was moved, presumably due to old links. Let it settle. J947 † ^edits 21:47, 8 July 2022 (UTC) reply
• Keep: Real term - I would no sooner delete this than I would Happy Editing-- IAm Chaos 05:20, 9 July 2022 (UTC) reply

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Jay (talk) 14:52, 15 July 2022 (UTC) reply

• Keep per J947. Redirects from one type of short horizontal line to a different type of short horizontal line are almost always going to be useful search terms. Especially when they are former locations of the content. Thryduulf ( talk) 15:58, 15 July 2022 (UTC) reply
• Keep per J947, IAmChaos, and Thryduulf. This page was at that title for most of its history, so it is useful to avoid breaking links. Also, who cares which specific hyphen or dash we use as long as it gets to where readers are seeking? Regards, SONIC 678 22:29, 15 July 2022 (UTC) reply

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was disambiguate. (non-admin closure) — Ceso femmuin mbolgaig mbung, mello hi! ( 投稿) 15:58, 22 July 2022 (UTC) reply

• Cricket at the South Asian Games → Cricket at the 2010 South Asian Games  ( talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure:  keep/ retarget/ delete ] 

Cricket has been at the SA Games twice: 2010 and Cricket at the 2019 South Asian Games. Redirecting to the 2010 edition is therefore misleading, better to delete the redirect, and maybe in future, someone could create a general article at this title, if it meets WP:GNG. Joseph 2302 ( talk) 12:02, 15 July 2022 (UTC) reply

• Set indexify, I've drafted a very basic one. Thryduulf ( talk) 16:05, 15 July 2022 (UTC) reply

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was keep. Helpful use for this redirect was found (cross-compatibility with German Wikipedia-imported templates). (non-admin closure) — Ceso femmuin mbolgaig mbung, mello hi! ( 投稿) 15:55, 22 July 2022 (UTC) reply

• Template:Dokumentation → Template:Documentation  ( talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure:  keep/ retarget/ delete ] 

This word is a German word, and I don't think we need to use this template. Q 𝟤 𝟪 09:42, 15 July 2022 (UTC) reply

• Delete: If there were plenty of incoming links, then there could be a reason to keep. But since it isn't used much, it's safe to assumed that deletion wouldn't be harmful. - CHAMPION ^{( talk) ( contributions) ( logs)} 10:45, 15 July 2022 (UTC) reply
• Delete: No need to have a redirect from the German language word for it. Joseph 2302 ( talk) 14:23, 15 July 2022 (UTC) reply
• Keep The purpose of this template is not frivolous; it is to assist editors importing template documentation from German Wikipedia, especially if they are new or unfamiliar with our documentation. At the very least it should be "subst"ed, as is common Wikipedia practice. The reason for the low usage is that editors who know what they're doing will have manually done this in the past, but an automatic replacement would be better. Bermicourt ( talk) 14:54, 15 July 2022 (UTC) reply
• Keep As noted above, this redirect is used to retain documentation functionality when porting templates from de.wikipedia. As you may know, de.wikipedia has a strong template development culture, and created some incredible functionality that en.wikipedia now uses, like the BS icons, and they continue to create templates of use to our project. Van Isaac, MPLL ^cont _WpWS 17:58, 15 July 2022 (UTC) reply
• Keep per Bermicourt and Vanisaac. Harmless, possibly helpful. BD2412 T 22:52, 15 July 2022 (UTC) reply
• Delete Surely translating a template from German already requires more than changing a K to a C. This redirect serves to encourage lazy editing of a sort that is not wanted. * Pppery * _{it has begun...} 12:59, 17 July 2022 (UTC) reply
• Keep, harmless, possible uses exist. Many redirects exist for the convenience of the lazy. — Kusma ( talk) 13:03, 17 July 2022 (UTC) reply
• Keep as a standard template used to translate articles from one Wikipedia language to another. We need more of these template redirects and substitutions, not fewer. – Jonesey95 ( talk) 17:38, 17 July 2022 (UTC) reply
• Tag {{ R from misspelling}} as people do misspell hard-C words with k's -- 64.229.88.43 ( talk) 04:28, 18 July 2022 (UTC) reply

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was retarget to D.C. Five. (non-admin closure) — Ceso femmuin mbolgaig mbung, mello hi! ( 投稿) 15:57, 22 July 2022 (UTC) reply

• 2009 attempted defection of 5 Virginians → Al-Qaeda#Criticism  ( talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure:  keep/ retarget/ delete ] 

Was an article, but it doesn't seem like a likely redirect search term anymore. TraderCharlotte ( talk) 03:11, 8 July 2022 (UTC) reply

• Delete: per nom, very low pageviews Happy Editing-- IAm Chaos 05:12, 9 July 2022 (UTC) reply
• If a concern is that a suitable target is not available, then retarget to D.C. Five. No comment on the wordings of the redirect title. Jay (talk) 03:54, 15 July 2022 (UTC) reply

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, CycloneYoris ^talk! 09:10, 15 July 2022 (UTC) reply

• Retarget to D.C. Five. The original WP:BLAR was appropriate, but now there is a clearly better target. Mdewman6 ( talk) 01:52, 19 July 2022 (UTC) reply

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was retarget to 1966 in Japan. While the fate of other "Showa X" / "Shōwa X" redirects is beyond the formal scope of this RfD, I think WP:BOLD retargets would be likely noncontroversial for years after 1945; per IP61, the stated logic for this retarget does not necessarily apply for 1945 or prior, and a second RfD may be needed for those. -- Tamzin ^{cetacean needed} (she|they|xe) 04:18, 22 July 2022 (UTC) reply

• Showa 41 → 1966  ( talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure:  keep/ retarget/ delete ] 

• Shōwa 41 → 1966  ( talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure:  keep/ retarget/ delete ] 

Nominating this alongside Showa 41. Why would this be notable in Japanese? TraderCharlotte ( talk) 03:29, 8 July 2022 (UTC) reply

• Keep it is mentioned at the destination, and all years should all have such redirects, so that people can access the years when they want to know what year that is. This is written in English and used in English as this particular year, when referring to Japanese topics. -- 64.229.88.43 ( talk) 06:44, 8 July 2022 (UTC) reply
• Keep: Not unreasonable that someone would be searching for a year that was written somewhere in Japanese and looking for context. Happy Editing-- IAm Chaos 05:15, 9 July 2022 (UTC) reply
• Keep: Traditional Japanese system of dating that refers to the target year. Useful for those who might want to know what year it refers to. Hzh ( talk) 10:24, 9 July 2022 (UTC) reply
• Retarget to 1966 in Japan, since this years numbering system is only used in Japan, any reference to it is almost certainly about Japan. Oiyarbepsy ( talk) 21:43, 9 July 2022 (UTC) reply
• Retarget per Oiyarbepsy as best fitting. — Ceso femmuin mbolgaig mbung, mello hi! ( 投稿) 00:25, 10 July 2022 (UTC) reply
• Retarget to 1966 in Japan per Oiyarbepsy -- Lenticel ^{( talk)} 05:52, 11 July 2022 (UTC) reply
• Retarget ALL Showa/Shōwa years to the corresponding YEAR in Japan article. Fieari ( talk) 05:02, 14 July 2022 (UTC) reply
• Retarget per Fieari. If retargeted, then 1925 in Japan ( Shōwa 1) through 1945 in Japan ( Shōwa 20) may need {{ redirect}} hatnotes for years in Japanese colonies (which also officially used Japanese year names until liberation). At the moment the only ones that seem to exist are 1925 in Taiwan through 1945 in Taiwan (i.e. no 1925 in Korea through 1945 in Korea nor 1925 in the South Seas Mandate through 1945 in the South Seas Mandate). 61.239.39.90 ( talk) 02:46, 15 July 2022 (UTC) reply

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: Relisting to add Showa 41, which despite being mentioned by the nom, wasn't added properly to this discussion.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, CycloneYoris ^talk! 03:32, 15 July 2022 (UTC) reply

• Keep, correct name for the year, mentioned in sidebar. — Kusma ( talk) 15:47, 15 July 2022 (UTC) reply
• Retarget to 1966 in Japan: Only in Japan do they used this numbering system, so people searching for Showa 41 are almost certainly going to look for Japan-related information. Joseph 2302 ( talk) 15:52, 15 July 2022 (UTC) reply
• Retarget to 1966 in Japan per Oiyarbepsy. Beefaloe (formerly SpursySituation) ( talk) 22:17, 15 July 2022 (UTC) reply
• Retarget to 1966 in Japan - Probably similar redirects should be retargeted in the same manner. A7V2 ( talk) 02:25, 19 July 2022 (UTC) reply

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was retarget to Names of China. (non-admin closure) — Ceso femmuin mbolgaig mbung, mello hi! ( 投稿) 23:30, 21 July 2022 (UTC) reply

• Китай → China  ( talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure:  keep/ retarget/ delete ] 

"China" in Cyrillic. Created by since-banned User:Neelix. I don't think we need this redirect. TraderCharlotte ( talk) 03:13, 8 July 2022 (UTC) reply

• I do not think this redirect is necessary either. The English Wikipedia is not a repository of redirects for every language. Yue 🌙 05:15, 8 July 2022 (UTC) reply
• Retarget either back to the long-term stable target Cathay (where this pointed for 14 years before being pointed to China by a sockpuppet), or to Names of China, both of which discuss this name. Compare the treatment of other non-English names for countries, e.g. Ilbon and Rìběn → Names of Japan, Miandian and Brahmadesh → Names of Myanmar, ベトナム and 越南 → Names of Vietnam, etc. 61.239.39.90 ( talk) 15:47, 8 July 2022 (UTC) reply
• Retarget per the IP user above. The term is mentioned at Cathay. — Mx. Granger ( talk · contribs) 07:32, 9 July 2022 (UTC) reply
• Retarget to Names of China where the term is discussed. The article also points to Cathay so that article is also served -- Lenticel ^{( talk)} 05:55, 11 July 2022 (UTC) reply
• Retarget to Names of China, primary topic that also links to Cathay. People will find what they are looking for this way. Fieari ( talk) 05:08, 14 July 2022 (UTC) reply

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: Retarget to Names of China or to Cathay?
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, CycloneYoris ^talk! 03:19, 15 July 2022 (UTC) reply

• Retarget to Names of China, just like 德國 redirects to Names of Germany. — Kusma ( talk) 16:01, 15 July 2022 (UTC) reply

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.