The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was keep. (non-admin closure) Galobtter ( pingó mió) 13:12, 24 January 2018 (UTC) reply

• Triple Gate → Huldah Gates  ( talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure:  keep/ retarget/ delete ] 

Triple Gate is too confusing for specific gate Arthistorian1977 ( talk) 19:50, 14 January 2018 (UTC) reply

This is the term used on Southern Wall where the linking is coming from. If you think that may be confusing, you should look into the references and discuss it on that page. Tomdo08 ( talk) 19:57, 14 January 2018

PS: ... also defined as such on the target side of the links: Huldah Gates Tomdo08 ( talk) 20:05, 14 January 2018 (UTC) reply

• Keep Articles about Huldah Gate are what Google returns when one searches for "triple gate". —  MShabazz  ^Talk/ _Stalk 15:09, 15 January 2018 (UTC) reply
• Comment I noticed there are Triple Gate sections in Solomon's Porch? AngusWOOF ( bark • sniff) 23:36, 16 January 2018 (UTC) reply

Good catch, made notes to both talk pages about this. Tomdo08 ( talk) 02:58, 22 January 2018 (UTC) reply

• Keep A couple of links where the terms ('Double Gate' and 'Triple Gate') are used as known identity:

• http://www.loc.gov/pictures/item/mpc2004002441/PP/
• http://www.loc.gov/pictures/item/mpc2004002440/PP/
• http://www.agapebiblestudy.com/documents/The Gates of Jerusalem.htm
• http://www.generationword.com/jerusalem101/47-southern-temple-wall.html
• http://www.israel-a-history-of.com/gates-of-jerusalem.html#The%20Huldah%20Gates
• https://www.ritmeyer.com/2010/12/14/the-beautiful-gate-of-the-temple/
• https://www.bibleplaces.com/southerntm/
• https://www.biblosfoundation.org/wp-content/uploads/2016/06/BAR.Article.TempleMt.pdf
• https://www.baslibrary.org/biblical-archaeology-review/15/6/4
• https://books.google.de/books?id=0TuCAgAAQBAJ&pg=PA66&dq=%22Double+Gate%22+Jerusalem&hl=de&sa=X
• https://books.google.de/books?id=QcxKAwAAQBAJ&pg=PA153&dq=%22Double+Gate%22+Jerusalem&hl=de&sa=X
• https://books.google.de/books?id=S1hAFUkOtbMC&pg=PA119&dq=%22Double+Gate%22+Jerusalem&hl=de&sa=X
• https://books.google.de/books?id=cSuErBFmykQC&pg=PA542&dq=%22Double+Gate%22+Jerusalem&hl=de&sa=X
• https://books.google.de/books?id=9evpVS_ackwC&pg=PA116&dq=%22Double+Gate%22+Jerusalem&hl=de&sa=X
• https://books.google.de/books?id=-qQUCgAAQBAJ&pg=PA78&dq=%22Triple+Gate%22+Jerusalem&hl=de&sa=X
• https://books.google.de/books?id=QcxKAwAAQBAJ&pg=PA153&dq=%22Triple+Gate%22+Jerusalem&hl=de&sa=X
• https://books.google.de/books?id=vaEGAENEA74C&pg=PA26&dq=%22Triple+Gate%22+Jerusalem&hl=de&sa=X
• https://books.google.de/books?id=S1hAFUkOtbMC&pg=PA119&dq=%22Triple+Gate%22+Jerusalem&hl=de&sa=X
• https://books.google.de/books?id=9Z2cFY9iGqgC&pg=PA237&dq=%22Triple+Gate%22+Jerusalem&hl=de&sa=X
• https://books.google.de/books?id=9evpVS_ackwC&pg=PA116&dq=%22Triple+Gate%22+Jerusalem&hl=de&sa=X

Tomdo08 ( talk) 02:42, 22 January 2018 (UTC) reply

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was retarget to Slaughterhouse Rulez. (non-admin closure) feminist ( talk) 16:09, 22 January 2018 (UTC) reply

• Slaughterhouse rules → The Cider House Rules  ( talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure:  keep/ retarget/ delete ] 
• Slaughter House Rules → The Cider House Rules  ( talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure:  keep/ retarget/ delete ] 
• Slaughter house rules → The Cider House Rules  ( talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure:  keep/ retarget/ delete ] 

Deletion suggested. This is a recent (triple?) redirect - see Slaughter House Rules and Slaughter house rules - and makes no sense whatsoever. Nothing within the target article suggests any reason for the redirect. Googling "Slaughterhouse rules" and "Slaughter House Rules" offers no clues. A new article has now been created, a film (presently a preview) named Slaughterhouse Rulez which is how I arrived at the redirect, dropping down in the 'search' field. Confusing and unnecessary for these redirects to exist, IMO. - Semperito ( talk) 19:20, 14 January 2018 (UTC) reply

Retarget to Slaughterhouse Rulez. @ Semperito: If we're going to discuss one, we should probably discuss all three. Would you object to me adding the other two redirects to this RfD? — PinkAmpers & ^{(Je vous invite à me parler)} 20:39, 14 January 2018 (UTC) reply

That's good, thank you, PinkAmpersand. I am inexperienced in this so it is a learning process for me.- Semperito ( talk) 20:44, 14 January 2018 (UTC) reply

Okay. I've added them. My !vote for them is the same as for the first one: retarget. — PinkAmpers & ^{(Je vous invite à me parler)} 20:50, 14 January 2018 (UTC) reply

• Retarget per PinkAmpersand.- Semperito ( talk) 13:15, 15 January 2018 (UTC) reply
• Retarget to Slaughterhouse Rulez film as most likely target. Add hatnote to the article about House Rules (mixtape) album by Slaughterhouse and to the slaughterhouse article if they are concerned about general regulations and laws about slaughter houses as shown in news articles. [1] [2] [3] [4]. AngusWOOF ( bark • sniff) 01:00, 16 January 2018 (UTC) reply

A look at their contributions for 13 January alone shows 26 new redirects, with many nonsense minor variations on song lyric-lines, spelling, capitalization and punctuation.-- Semperito ( talk) 16:05, 16 January 2018 (UTC) reply

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was retarget to Metroid Prime Hunters. (non-admin closure) feminist ( talk) 16:11, 22 January 2018 (UTC) reply

• Kriken → Metroid  ( talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure:  keep/ retarget/ delete ] 

Not mentioned in the article. Unnecessary redirect - delete. _{ZXCVBNM ( TALK)} 07:18, 7 January 2018 (UTC) reply

• Comment mentioned in one sentence in Metroid: Prime Hunters and has an entry at List of fictional alien species: K AngusWOOF ( bark • sniff) 12:00, 9 January 2018 (UTC) reply

• Retarget to Metroid Prime Hunters. — PinkAmpers & ^{(Je vous invite à me parler)} 14:33, 20 January 2018 (UTC) reply

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was retarget to Characters in the Metroid series#Antagonists. (non-admin closure) Galobtter ( pingó mió) 11:33, 21 January 2018 (UTC) reply

• Enemies in the Metroid Prime series → Metroid  ( talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure:  keep/ retarget/ delete ] 

Not mentioned in the article. Unnecessary redirect - delete. _{ZXCVBNM ( TALK)} 04:21, 7 January 2018 (UTC) reply

• Delete per nom. AngusWOOF ( bark • sniff) 18:20, 9 January 2018 (UTC) reply

Striking my vote, given that the Characters article explains who the antagonists are, especially the Metroids. AngusWOOF ( bark • sniff) 20:45, 14 January 2018 (UTC) reply

• Retarget to Characters in the Metroid series#Antagonists. -- Tavix ^{( talk)} 18:15, 12 January 2018 (UTC) reply

• Retarget per Tavix. — PinkAmpers & ^{(Je vous invite à me parler)} 20:40, 14 January 2018 (UTC) reply

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was draftify. It will be found at Draft:Abhilash Pudukad if anybody cares to work on it. -- Tavix ^{( talk)} 15:02, 25 January 2018 (UTC) reply

• Abhilash Pudukad → S. Janaki  ( talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure:  keep/ retarget/ delete ] 

Not in target - unclear piggy backing PRehse ( talk) 12:36, 27 December 2017 (UTC) reply

It may be worth reading the talk page. In the last hour or two there has been discussion about making some sort of mention in the target. - Sitush ( talk) 12:38, 27 December 2017 (UTC) reply

• This was created as a rather spammy article about a person who, judging from the comments on the talk page, might be just past the notability threshold, so I'm not sure if RfD is the best place to make a decision on that. The most "proper" course of action seems to be restoring the article, then trimming the puffery and taking it to AfD. Anyone's got the time for that? A move to the draft namespace (without leaving a redirect) would be an easier alternative. – Uanfala (talk) 21:35, 13 January 2018 (UTC) reply
• Draftify per Uanfala. Anyone who wants to work on it can work on in draft space there, and if that doesn't happen in a reasonable amount of time it gets deleted as stale without further drama. More likely to produce a useful outcome than restoring in mainspace and sending to AFD – which will likely result in either a bunch of people voting for WP:TNT regardless of the merits, or not wanting to deal with it at all (a la Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Characters of Final Fantasy V). 59.149.124.29 ( talk) 06:34, 14 January 2018 (UTC) reply

• Draftify per above Galobtter ( pingó mió) 18:15, 14 January 2018 (UTC) reply

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was soft redirect to September. (non-admin closure) Galobtter ( pingó mió) 11:31, 21 January 2018 (UTC) reply

• User:Fryedk → September  ( talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure:  keep/ retarget/ delete ] 

Redirect from user page to unconnected Article Kudpung กุดผึ้ง ( talk) 09:06, 14 January 2018 (UTC) reply

• Soften. Fryedk specifically wants their user page to redirect to September, and since users have wide latitude to decide what should be on their userpage, I see no reason to deny them that ability. However, a hard redirect is somewhat problematic, because anyone else wanting to view their userpage would not want to automatically be taken to September. Converting it to a soft redirect solves that problem while allowing Fryedk to use their userpage how they wish. -- Tavix ^{( talk)} 16:48, 14 January 2018 (UTC) reply
• Procedural question. Are we sure that this belongs here, rather than at MfD? Does this forum have the "constitutional" power to order someone to change their userpage? — PinkAmpers & ^{(Je vous invite à me parler)} 20:44, 14 January 2018 (UTC) reply
• Soft redirect per Tavix. This is traditionally the outcome on RfD for redirects from the "User:" namespace to the "(article)" namespace. Steel1943 ( talk) 03:11, 16 January 2018 (UTC) reply
• Soft redirect per Tavix. As for the "constitutional" question, I wouldn't object if I saw this at MFD, but RfD is the "proper" place to discuss redirects regardless of namespace, with redirects in the template and project namespaces being particularly common. – Uanfala (talk) 22:14, 19 January 2018 (UTC) reply

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was delete. -- Tavix ^{( talk)} 02:55, 23 January 2018 (UTC) reply

• Marte (planet) → Mars  ( talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure:  keep/ retarget/ delete ] 

Not mentioned at Marte. Fails WP:FORRED: no connection to any of the languages listed here. LaundryPizza03 ( talk) 08:27, 14 January 2018 (UTC) reply

• Delete. Perhaps a misspelling of Spanish martes (Tuesday)? Days of the week are named after Roman gods and corresponding celestial objects in Romance languages (Moon day, Mars day, Mercury day, etc), except Christians partially renamed Saturday and Sunday. If it is a misspelling, it's not likely useful to an English reader. Ivanvector ( ^Talk/ _Edits) 14:12, 16 January 2018 (UTC) reply
  • I don't think it is a misspelling, Marte does mean Mars in Italian, Spanish and Portuguese. Although I'm not too sure what use this redirect could have in the English wikipedia, since non-English speakers wouldn't be looking for info on the planet here. So delete. RetiredDuke ( talk) 15:01, 21 January 2018 (UTC) reply
    • Well I didn't know that, but I agree it's probably not useful in English. Although, Mars (mythology) is listed at the disambiguation page for Marte. Ivanvector ( ^Talk/ _Edits) 15:57, 21 January 2018 (UTC) reply
• Delete per Ivanvector. Double sharp ( talk) 06:30, 17 January 2018 (UTC) reply

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was keep. (non-admin closure) feminist ( talk) 16:09, 22 January 2018 (UTC) reply

• Dajavu → Déjà vu  ( talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure:  keep/ retarget/ delete ] 

Implausible misspelling. LaundryPizza03 ( talk) 08:16, 14 January 2018 (UTC) reply

• Keep this is the way it is pronounced and would be spelled by someone who only heard the phrase. -- RAN ( talk) 18:03, 14 January 2018 (UTC) reply
• Keep per RAN. — PinkAmpers & ^{(Je vous invite à me parler)} 21:10, 14 January 2018 (UTC) reply
• Keep. Reasonable and helpful redirect. American Eagle ( talk) 04:48, 16 January 2018 (UTC) reply
• Keep per RAN. Double sharp ( talk) 06:30, 17 January 2018 (UTC) reply

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was Speedy delete by RHaworth per speedy deletion criterion G6. Steel1943 ( talk) 04:04, 16 January 2018 (UTC) reply

• Mexican' → Mexico  ( talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure:  keep/ retarget/ delete ] 

Ends with an apostrophe. LaundryPizza03 ( talk) 08:15, 14 January 2018 (UTC) reply

• Delete. Appears to have originally been a mistake made during a pagemove, which was later retargeted for whatever reason at the same time that its own original target was itself retargeted. — PinkAmpers & ^{(Je vous invite à me parler)} 20:55, 14 January 2018 (UTC) reply
• Speedy delete should have been cleaned up after the page moves for Mexican't. I've sent a request, hopefully it will take. AngusWOOF ( bark • sniff) 01:21, 16 January 2018 (UTC) reply

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was keep. (non-admin closure) feminist ( talk) 16:10, 22 January 2018 (UTC) reply

• Amercia → United States  ( talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure:  keep/ retarget/ delete ] 

Implausible typo. LaundryPizza03 ( talk) 08:11, 14 January 2018 (UTC) reply

• Keep. As far as misspellings go, this one is fairly noteworthy: [5]. -- Tavix ^{( talk)} 16:41, 14 January 2018 (UTC) reply
• Keep. This typo even has its own Wiktionary entry. Also half a million GHits even excluding Romney. — PinkAmpers & ^{(Je vous invite à me parler)} 20:57, 14 January 2018 (UTC) reply
• Keep. How is it that implausible? You type the "c" before the "i". ♫ Hurricanehink ( talk) 19:32, 16 January 2018 (UTC) reply
• Keep. Easy to accidentally type and made very famous by Mitt Romney. [6] Mortee ( talk) 04:14, 17 January 2018 (UTC) reply

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was delete. -- Tavix ^{( talk)} 02:54, 23 January 2018 (UTC) reply

• Dlorah Nadroj → Bizarro World  ( talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure:  keep/ retarget/ delete ]

• Dlorah "Lah" Nadroj → Bizarro World  ( talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure:  keep/ retarget/ delete ] 

Not mentioned in target. This is " Jordan Harold" spelled backward. LaundryPizza03 ( talk) 07:16, 14 January 2018 (UTC) reply

• Originally this went to Yellow Lantern, but since a merge, perhaps it should redirect to Hal Jordan. See https://en.wikipedia.org/?title=Yellow_Lantern&oldid=222595044 for relevant revision. IP 75.33.239.161 requested this redirect on AFC. It is not useful as it is, and I guess it may be an OR, so delete is a good idea. Graeme Bartlett ( talk) 06:12, 16 January 2018 (UTC) reply

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was delete. -- Tavix ^{( talk)} 23:45, 22 January 2018 (UTC) reply

• Fryeeday → Friday  ( talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure:  keep/ retarget/ delete ] 

A weird misspelling. LaundryPizza03 ( talk) 07:02, 14 January 2018 (UTC) reply

• Delete note there are several claims by people and companies for Fryeday just not with the two e's. AngusWOOF ( bark • sniff) 01:17, 16 January 2018 (UTC) reply
• Delete - it would be a stretch to call this a misspelling of Frîjatag or any of the Germanic variants of Friday, and they would probably fail WP:FORRED anyway. Ivanvector ( ^Talk/ _Edits) 14:18, 16 January 2018 (UTC) reply

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was delete. -- Tavix ^{( talk)} 23:45, 22 January 2018 (UTC) reply

• Dick (American Slang) → Dick#Other  ( talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure:  keep/ retarget/ delete ] 

Malformed disambiguation, so can’t redirect to Dick (slang). LaundryPizza03 ( talk) 06:59, 14 January 2018 (UTC) reply

• Delete - improper disambiguation, unless this has something to do with the Gaslight Anthem album. Ivanvector ( ^Talk/ _Edits) 14:49, 15 January 2018 (UTC) reply
• Keep - I just fixed the redirect. CLCStudent ( talk) 21:23, 15 January 2018 (UTC) reply
• Delete no other slang articles to disambiguate. AngusWOOF ( bark • sniff) 01:14, 16 January 2018 (UTC) reply

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was keep all except for Trypthophan. -- Tavix ^{( talk)} 14:52, 25 January 2018 (UTC) reply

• Triptophan → Tryptophan  ( talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure:  keep/ retarget/ delete ]

• Triptofan → Tryptophan  ( talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure:  keep/ retarget/ delete ]

• Triptafan → Tryptophan  ( talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure:  keep/ retarget/ delete ]

• Tryptafan → Tryptophan  ( talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure:  keep/ retarget/ delete ]

• Triptofen → Tryptophan  ( talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure:  keep/ retarget/ delete ]

• Trypthophan → Tryptophan  ( talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure:  keep/ retarget/ delete ]

• Tryptopan → Tryptophan  ( talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure:  keep/ retarget/ delete ] 

Some, if not all, of these are implausible. Definitely the third to last. LaundryPizza03 ( talk) 06:47, 14 January 2018 (UTC) reply

• Keep all obvious phonetic spellings for when the word is heard and not seen. -- RAN ( talk) 18:01, 14 January 2018 (UTC) reply
• Delete Trypthophan as highly unlikely due to the use of "th". Keep The rest. Yes, this is surprisingly a difficult word to spell. Steel1943 ( talk) 17:35, 15 January 2018 (UTC) reply
• Keep all but Trypthophan per Steel1943. Double sharp ( talk) 06:30, 17 January 2018 (UTC) reply
• Keep all. Trypthophan seems like a plausible spelling when the word is read at speed, making it hard to differentiate the "to" and "tho" sound. ---- Patar knight - ^chat/ _{contributions} 08:14, 23 January 2018 (UTC) reply
• Keep all but the last two. The rest are plausible misspellings. — PinkAmpers & ^{(Je vous invite à me parler)} 11:05, 23 January 2018 (UTC) reply

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was delete. -- Tavix ^{( talk)} 23:44, 22 January 2018 (UTC) reply

• Yittrium (element) → Yttrium  ( talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure:  keep/ retarget/ delete ] 

Nothing to disambiguate from. LaundryPizza03 ( talk) 06:38, 14 January 2018 (UTC) reply

• Delete - unnecessary disambiguation from a probably likely misspelling but which still creates a word unlikely to be confused with anything else. Ivanvector ( ^Talk/ _Edits) 14:50, 15 January 2018 (UTC) reply
• Delete per Ivanvector. Double sharp ( talk) 06:30, 17 January 2018 (UTC) reply

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was delete. -- Tavix ^{( talk)} 23:43, 22 January 2018 (UTC) reply

• Element LXXIX → Gold  ( talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure:  keep/ retarget/ delete ] 

Implausible use of Roman numerals. In chemistry, Roman numerals indicate oxidation states, not atomic numbers. LaundryPizza03 ( talk) 06:36, 14 January 2018 (UTC) reply

• Delete per nom. No usage of such in books or journals. They are used more for numbering references and volumes that go out that far. AngusWOOF ( bark • sniff) 01:24, 16 January 2018 (UTC) reply
• Delete per nom; WP:RFD#D2 confusing. Ivanvector ( ^Talk/ _Edits) 14:20, 16 January 2018 (UTC) reply
• Delete per nom. Double sharp ( talk) 06:30, 17 January 2018 (UTC) reply
• Delete - This looks like an open-and-shut case for deletion. CoffeeWithMarkets ( talk) 06:27, 19 January 2018 (UTC) reply
• Delete. Unless those LXXXII miners get their fingers out, Narky Blert ( talk) 03:36, 20 January 2018 (UTC) reply

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was delete. -- Tavix ^{( talk)} 23:33, 22 January 2018 (UTC) reply

• Ninja Turtle Food → Pizza  ( talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure:  keep/ retarget/ delete ] 

Weird redirect based on Teenage Mutant Ninja Turtles. Article does not mention this. LaundryPizza03 ( talk) 06:23, 14 January 2018 (UTC) reply

• Delete per nom. Ninja turtle already takes them to the appropriate article. AngusWOOF ( bark • sniff) 20:47, 14 January 2018 (UTC) reply
• Delete - Useless. CoffeeWithMarkets ( talk) 06:28, 19 January 2018 (UTC) reply

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was delete. -- Patar knight - ^chat/ _{contributions} 08:16, 23 January 2018 (UTC) reply

• Dumpster® diving → Dumpster diving  ( talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure:  keep/ retarget/ delete ] 
• Dumpster(r) diving → Dumpster diving  ( talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure:  keep/ retarget/ delete ] 

Implausible. -- Tavix ^{( talk)} 03:22, 14 January 2018 (UTC) reply

• Delete per WP:MOS/TM; note that Dumpster® does not exist. LaundryPizza03 ( talk) 06:13, 14 January 2018 (UTC) reply
• Delete per nom. AngusWOOF ( bark • sniff) 20:48, 14 January 2018 (UTC) reply
• Delete - Dumpster may be a genericized trademark (it was at one time, now it's not clear) but the scavenging activity has nothing to do with that trademark. Ivanvector ( ^Talk/ _Edits) 14:53, 15 January 2018 (UTC) dumpster reply
• Delete per the above and because it's implausible that a reader would actually use it.  —  SMcCandlish ☏ ¢ >^ʌⱷ҅_ᴥⱷ^ʌ<  17:14, 16 January 2018 (UTC) reply
• Delete per all the above. Double sharp ( talk) 06:42, 17 January 2018 (UTC) reply
• Delete. What registered trademark? Whether or not Dumpster is one, Dumpster diving is not. Narky Blert ( talk) 03:29, 20 January 2018 (UTC) reply

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.