From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

April Fools' MfDs

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the miscellaneous page below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the discussion was April fools day is over, these are all joke noms, speedy keep, non-admin closure

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the miscellaneous page below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the discussion was: procedural close, Kept (April Fools). Avic ennasis @ 14:26, 21 Kislev 5777 / 14:26, 21 December 2016 (UTC) reply

User talk:Jimbo Wales

Because it will make a very good April Fools Joke, and his Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/User:Jimbo Wales is also being discussed for deletion because it's a hoax. Techman224 Talk 16:44, 1 April 2009 (UTC) reply

Delete, wheel warred, and do it all over again as many people still believe in Jimbo Wales. Techman224 Talk 16:48, 1 April 2009 (UTC) reply

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.


The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the miscellaneous page below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the discussion was Speedy close as exceeding maximum page title limit. Page titles with more than three slashes must be approved by the process committee. filetS ( atlk) 12:17, 1 April 2009 (UTC) reply

Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/User:Jimbo Wales

Page title is far too long. Steve Crossin :  Chat  11:55, 1 April 2009 (UTC) reply

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the miscellaneous page below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the discussion was Redirect on wheels. Stifle ( talk) 19:32, 7 April 2009 (UTC) reply

Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion

I'm nominating RFD for deletion. Redirects are cheap, and there should never be any need to remove them unless they point to a nonexistent page or are attacks, which is covered by speedy deletion. Also, I propose to speedy close any deletion review of redirects as an abuse of process. tleSif ( atlk) 08:13, 1 April 2009 (UTC) reply

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the miscellaneous page below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the discussion was Speedy deleted. NAC close by Uzma Gamal ( talk) 11:47, 5 November 2012 (UTC) reply

Wikipedia:Requests for adminship/123MFL

Erm... seems to have been a joke... or perhaps not... either way, this needs deleting. flaming lawyer 02:58, 1 April 2009 (UTC) reply

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.



The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

April Fools' MfDs

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the miscellaneous page below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the discussion was April fools day is over, these are all joke noms, speedy keep, non-admin closure

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the miscellaneous page below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the discussion was: procedural close, Kept (April Fools). Avic ennasis @ 14:26, 21 Kislev 5777 / 14:26, 21 December 2016 (UTC) reply

User talk:Jimbo Wales

Because it will make a very good April Fools Joke, and his Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/User:Jimbo Wales is also being discussed for deletion because it's a hoax. Techman224 Talk 16:44, 1 April 2009 (UTC) reply

Delete, wheel warred, and do it all over again as many people still believe in Jimbo Wales. Techman224 Talk 16:48, 1 April 2009 (UTC) reply

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.


The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the miscellaneous page below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the discussion was Speedy close as exceeding maximum page title limit. Page titles with more than three slashes must be approved by the process committee. filetS ( atlk) 12:17, 1 April 2009 (UTC) reply

Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/User:Jimbo Wales

Page title is far too long. Steve Crossin :  Chat  11:55, 1 April 2009 (UTC) reply

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the miscellaneous page below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the discussion was Redirect on wheels. Stifle ( talk) 19:32, 7 April 2009 (UTC) reply

Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion

I'm nominating RFD for deletion. Redirects are cheap, and there should never be any need to remove them unless they point to a nonexistent page or are attacks, which is covered by speedy deletion. Also, I propose to speedy close any deletion review of redirects as an abuse of process. tleSif ( atlk) 08:13, 1 April 2009 (UTC) reply

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the miscellaneous page below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the discussion was Speedy deleted. NAC close by Uzma Gamal ( talk) 11:47, 5 November 2012 (UTC) reply

Wikipedia:Requests for adminship/123MFL

Erm... seems to have been a joke... or perhaps not... either way, this needs deleting. flaming lawyer 02:58, 1 April 2009 (UTC) reply

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.



The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

Videos

Youtube | Vimeo | Bing

Websites

Google | Yahoo | Bing

Encyclopedia

Google | Yahoo | Bing

Facebook