The list was promoted by Giants2008 22:08, 26 March 2012 [1].
List of Sites of Special Scientific Interest in Cornwall ( | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views)
Toolbox |
---|
I am nominating this for featured list, on behalf of Jowaninpensans and myself, because I feel it meets all criteria. This list has been significantly upgraded over the last few months, modelled on the other SSSI featured lists, with all of the entries now being blue-linked. All feedback welcomed! Cheers, Zangar ( talk) 20:26, 2 February 2012 (UTC) reply
Good work so far on this list, guys. I have a question before expressing an opinion on this article's eligibility for featured list status. Could you tell me how many of the blue links point to (a) an article solely about the SSSI in question or (b) a section on the SSSI in a broader article. If the majority of them do then I think we're well on the way to featured list status. I ask because for a few articles that I checked, the link just appeared to take me to an article on a nearby village or one that has the same name as the SSSI, with minimal mention of the SSSI, still less its wildlife or geological interest, in the article. My concern is that the bluelink-count is artifically inflated. SP-KP ( talk) 12:32, 3 February 2012 (UTC) reply
The Rambling Man ( talk) 19:17, 6 February 2012 (UTC) reply
Comments
The Rambling Man ( talk) 12:17, 28 February 2012 (UTC) reply
Quick comments –
|format=PDF
but that would be a lot of work and would look silly considering they're all PDFs. I would consult one of the FL directors for clarity on this in case. An alternative would be to add a note near the refs stating they are all PDFs.
NapHit (
talk) 23:15, 4 March 2012 (UTC)
replyThe list was promoted by Giants2008 22:08, 26 March 2012 [1].
List of Sites of Special Scientific Interest in Cornwall ( | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views)
Toolbox |
---|
I am nominating this for featured list, on behalf of Jowaninpensans and myself, because I feel it meets all criteria. This list has been significantly upgraded over the last few months, modelled on the other SSSI featured lists, with all of the entries now being blue-linked. All feedback welcomed! Cheers, Zangar ( talk) 20:26, 2 February 2012 (UTC) reply
Good work so far on this list, guys. I have a question before expressing an opinion on this article's eligibility for featured list status. Could you tell me how many of the blue links point to (a) an article solely about the SSSI in question or (b) a section on the SSSI in a broader article. If the majority of them do then I think we're well on the way to featured list status. I ask because for a few articles that I checked, the link just appeared to take me to an article on a nearby village or one that has the same name as the SSSI, with minimal mention of the SSSI, still less its wildlife or geological interest, in the article. My concern is that the bluelink-count is artifically inflated. SP-KP ( talk) 12:32, 3 February 2012 (UTC) reply
The Rambling Man ( talk) 19:17, 6 February 2012 (UTC) reply
Comments
The Rambling Man ( talk) 12:17, 28 February 2012 (UTC) reply
Quick comments –
|format=PDF
but that would be a lot of work and would look silly considering they're all PDFs. I would consult one of the FL directors for clarity on this in case. An alternative would be to add a note near the refs stating they are all PDFs.
NapHit (
talk) 23:15, 4 March 2012 (UTC)
reply