The article was not promoted by SandyGeorgia 03:39, 14 November 2009 [1].
Toolbox |
---|
I am nominating this for featured article because... I think it meets FA criteria, after a PR i think it is ready Pedro J. the rookie 20:32, 12 November 2009 (UTC) reply
Oppose (suggest withdrawal): Has the primary contributor of this article User:Scorpion0422 been informed of this FAC nomination? This article uses primary sources (ie the episodes themselves) as a reference some fifteen times (refs #41-#55). In my book, watching an episode, determining character traits (or whatever) based on that viewing, and then adding that interpretation here constitutes original research. Only include information sourced to independent reliable sources, or at least, direct comments from the creators themselves. — indopug ( talk) 12:26, 13 November 2009 (UTC) reply
I want to give Pedro thy master a lot of credit for cleaning the page up. It's better than it was a month ago. However, I think it's not quite in FA territory yet. What is there very good, but I think it could still be expanded, with more influence and reception and possibly some more real-world info added. -- Scorpion 0422 18:56, 13 November 2009 (UTC) reply
The article was not promoted by SandyGeorgia 03:39, 14 November 2009 [1].
Toolbox |
---|
I am nominating this for featured article because... I think it meets FA criteria, after a PR i think it is ready Pedro J. the rookie 20:32, 12 November 2009 (UTC) reply
Oppose (suggest withdrawal): Has the primary contributor of this article User:Scorpion0422 been informed of this FAC nomination? This article uses primary sources (ie the episodes themselves) as a reference some fifteen times (refs #41-#55). In my book, watching an episode, determining character traits (or whatever) based on that viewing, and then adding that interpretation here constitutes original research. Only include information sourced to independent reliable sources, or at least, direct comments from the creators themselves. — indopug ( talk) 12:26, 13 November 2009 (UTC) reply
I want to give Pedro thy master a lot of credit for cleaning the page up. It's better than it was a month ago. However, I think it's not quite in FA territory yet. What is there very good, but I think it could still be expanded, with more influence and reception and possibly some more real-world info added. -- Scorpion 0422 18:56, 13 November 2009 (UTC) reply