The article was not promoted by SandyGeorgia ( Talk) 22:07, 8 May 2010 (UTC) diff. reply
Lisa Simpson ( | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views)
This is the third nomination for the page, which last failed two weeks ago. I actually felt that I had addressed the opposition to the article, but one opposer did not return to the page, and the other stopped coming back after a few exchanges (in both cases, I asked on their talk pages if their concerns were addressed). Anywaym I feel that the page has improved from where it was a month ago, with copyediting provided by the great Scartol. Enjoy! -- Scorpion 0422 02:43, 14 April 2010 (UTC) reply
currently failing criteria 3 File:Lisasmall2.gif & File:Lisa_Simpson.png should be combined to minimise use of non free content per wp:nfcc Fasach Nua ( talk) 19:22, 14 April 2010 (UTC) reply
Review by Charles Edward Just a few comments from me. Overall the article looks pretty good (image issue aside).
Neutral, this is really a great article, and the only thing holding it back, in my opinion, is the image issue. The article can only utilize a single image of Lisa by my understanding of WP:FAIRUSE. Under Fair Use Policy 3(a), it reads "Minimal usage. Multiple items of non-free content are not [to be] used if one item can convey equivalent significant information." One full length image of Lisa can adequately convey her appearance. On that point I have to agree with the other opposers. — Charles Edward ( Talk | Contribs) 13:00, 21 April 2010 (UTC) reply
-- Der Wohltemperierte Fuchs( talk) 19:27, 5 May 2010 (UTC) reply
The article was not promoted by SandyGeorgia ( Talk) 22:07, 8 May 2010 (UTC) diff. reply
Lisa Simpson ( | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views)
This is the third nomination for the page, which last failed two weeks ago. I actually felt that I had addressed the opposition to the article, but one opposer did not return to the page, and the other stopped coming back after a few exchanges (in both cases, I asked on their talk pages if their concerns were addressed). Anywaym I feel that the page has improved from where it was a month ago, with copyediting provided by the great Scartol. Enjoy! -- Scorpion 0422 02:43, 14 April 2010 (UTC) reply
currently failing criteria 3 File:Lisasmall2.gif & File:Lisa_Simpson.png should be combined to minimise use of non free content per wp:nfcc Fasach Nua ( talk) 19:22, 14 April 2010 (UTC) reply
Review by Charles Edward Just a few comments from me. Overall the article looks pretty good (image issue aside).
Neutral, this is really a great article, and the only thing holding it back, in my opinion, is the image issue. The article can only utilize a single image of Lisa by my understanding of WP:FAIRUSE. Under Fair Use Policy 3(a), it reads "Minimal usage. Multiple items of non-free content are not [to be] used if one item can convey equivalent significant information." One full length image of Lisa can adequately convey her appearance. On that point I have to agree with the other opposers. — Charles Edward ( Talk | Contribs) 13:00, 21 April 2010 (UTC) reply
-- Der Wohltemperierte Fuchs( talk) 19:27, 5 May 2010 (UTC) reply