From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

March 4

Category:Arab-Jewish culture in the United States

Relisted, see Wikipedia:Categories for discussion/Log/2024 March 13#Category:Arab-Jewish culture in the United States


Category:Texts by date

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: rename ( non-admin closure) Qwerfjkl talk 17:44, 13 March 2024 (UTC) reply
Nominator's rationale: rename, "period" is a better descriptor considering the content of the category. Marcocapelle ( talk) 18:14, 4 March 2024 (UTC) reply

The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Category:Harold B. Lee Library-related film articles

Relisted, see Wikipedia:Categories for discussion/Log/2024 March 13#Category:Harold B. Lee Library-related film articles


Category:Rolex sponsorships

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: delete ( non-admin closure) Qwerfjkl talk 17:47, 13 March 2024 (UTC) reply
Nominator's rationale: These events are not defined by having Rolex as a sponsor. User:Namiba 14:49, 4 March 2024 (UTC) reply
Support per nom Mason ( talk) 14:58, 4 March 2024 (UTC) reply

The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Category:Gallery pages of Landscapes of Tajikistan

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: speedy delete per author request. plicit 11:41, 5 March 2024 (UTC) reply
Nominator's rationale: Misapplication of categorization. — Alalch E. 13:54, 4 March 2024 (UTC) reply
I don't mind deleting categories, there was an error in the definition ( talk) 02:34, 5 March 2024 (UTC) reply
  • Meanwhile all four categories are empty, but based on the category names I suppose they contained files, and we already have dedicated files categories. Marcocapelle ( talk) 18:57, 4 March 2024 (UTC) reply

The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.


Category:University linguistics organizations

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: merge ( non-admin closure) Qwerfjkl talk 17:47, 13 March 2024 (UTC) reply
Nominator's rationale: Non-defining. These are organizations that happen to be at universities. That's not very helpful when linguistics is an academic field, so the norm is that organizations are connected with higher education in some way Mason ( talk) 04:52, 4 March 2024 (UTC) reply
  • Merge, linguistics organizations are naturally linked to universities and colleges. Marcocapelle ( talk) 06:30, 4 March 2024 (UTC) reply

The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.


Category:University of the Arctic

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: merge ( non-admin closure) Qwerfjkl talk 17:47, 13 March 2024 (UTC) reply
Nominator's rationale: Upmerge for now. Only two pages in here, which isn't helpful for navigation. Mason ( talk) 04:50, 4 March 2024 (UTC) reply

The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.


Category:University of Wyoming colleges

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: merge ( non-admin closure) Qwerfjkl talk 17:47, 13 March 2024 (UTC) reply
Nominator's rationale: Upmerge for now. Only one school in here, which is unhelpful for navigation Mason ( talk) 04:47, 4 March 2024 (UTC) reply

The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Category:Politicians killed in World War II

Relisted, see Wikipedia:Categories for discussion/Log/2024 March 13#Category:Politicians killed in World War II

Category:Deaths by stabbing in Rome

Relisted, see Wikipedia:Categories for discussion/Log/2024 March 13#Category:Deaths by stabbing in Rome

Category:Reportedly haunted locations in Raleigh, North Carolina

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: merge to Category:Reportedly haunted locations in North Carolina. (non-admin closure) Qwerfjkl talk 17:49, 13 March 2024 (UTC) reply
Nominator's rationale: Upmerge for now. Only on page in here, which is unhelpful for navigaiton Mason ( talk) 03:37, 4 March 2024 (UTC) reply

The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.


Category:Residential skyscrapers in Raleigh, North Carolina

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: merge ( non-admin closure) Qwerfjkl talk 17:50, 13 March 2024 (UTC) reply
Nominator's rationale: Upmerge for now. There's only one page in here, not helpful for navigaiton Mason ( talk) 03:34, 4 March 2024 (UTC) reply

The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.


Category:19th-century Filipino economists

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: merge ( non-admin closure) Qwerfjkl talk 17:50, 13 March 2024 (UTC) reply
Nominator's rationale: upmerge for now. Only one page in here. Mason ( talk) 02:34, 4 March 2024 (UTC) reply

The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Category:1905 German-language novels

Relisted, see Wikipedia:Categories for discussion/Log/2024 March 13#Category:1905 German-language novels


Category:Fictional transhumans

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: delete ( non-admin closure) Qwerfjkl talk 18:02, 13 March 2024 (UTC) reply
Nominator's rationale: This category and its related subcategories completely misunderstands the definition of "transhuman". These are all superhumans, not transhumans, which is a much more specific thing. There are fictional transhumans (Newtypes from Gundam come to mind) but none are actually listed here. We already have a category Category:Fictional superhumans so this is not necessary. ᴢxᴄᴠʙɴᴍ ( ) 00:58, 25 February 2024 (UTC) reply
Oppose. Your reasoning for deleting this category are just a subjective interpretation of what "transhuman" means. Maybe there's some overlap between "superhuman" and "transhuman", but I don't see a reason to just get rid of the category altogether. AHI-3000 ( talk) 04:48, 25 February 2024 (UTC) reply
Either you see them as identical to superhumans, which appears to be your view, in which case I don't understand why they should be separate. Or you see it as a specific case of "human evolved to be something superior to humans", which is much more specific than simply being, say, a vampire or undead, which can just as easily be monsters. That would mean this category should not be here unless someone can isolate the specific characters that apply. ᴢxᴄᴠʙɴᴍ ( ) 16:52, 25 February 2024 (UTC) reply
  • A transhuman is defined as "a being that resembles a human in most respects but who has powers and abilities beyond those of standard humans". While superhumans are defined as "humans, human-like beings or beings with qualities and abilities that exceed those naturally found in humans". That is too close to keep apart. Support nomination (though perhaps it should be a merge instead of deletion). Marcocapelle ( talk) 07:11, 25 February 2024 (UTC) reply
  • I am striking the "perhaps merge" part of my comment. Zxcvbnm is right that the category contains monsters rather than superhumans. Marcocapelle ( talk) 18:16, 25 February 2024 (UTC) reply
Oppose Transhumanism is the basic idea of transforming humans into "beings with abilities so greatly expanded from the current condition as to merit the label of posthuman beings." The concept typically covers "a new intelligent species, into which humanity will evolve and eventually will supplement or supersede it. " Dimadick ( talk) 17:59, 26 February 2024 (UTC) reply
My argument is that the category contains no transhumans, so it is a misnomer. You are answering the strawman argument of whether transhumans are notable. ᴢxᴄᴠʙɴᴍ ( ) 19:10, 26 February 2024 (UTC) reply

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, House Blaster ( talk · he/him) 00:55, 4 March 2024 (UTC) reply


The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.


Category:Ottoman-Azerbaijani wars

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: delete ( non-admin closure) Qwerfjkl talk 18:02, 13 March 2024 (UTC) reply
Nominator's rationale: Anachronistic and revisionist to use "Azerbaijani" in this era and especially to use it when referring to the Turkoman Aq Qoyunlu, and thus unsurprisingly not even used in WP:RS. I already tried to explain it to the creator of the category but to no avail [1]. HistoryofIran ( talk) 14:38, 25 February 2024 (UTC) reply
Yeah, this is the second time the user has created this category (the first time it got deleted for being emptied when I reverted them). The reason I took it here this time is so we have a documented reason for its deletion. I'm not sure if Category:Ottoman-Aq Qoyunlu wars is useful because I'm not sure if Aq Qoyunlu and Ottomans have had a "war" per se? Conflict sure, but something described as a "war" by scholars? Not so sure. A quick glance at ebooks didn't show anything. -- HistoryofIran ( talk) 23:00, 25 February 2024 (UTC) reply
The main article on Aq Qoyunlu covers Ottoman participation in power struggles over the Aq Qoyunlu's leadership position in the 1490s and the 1500s. Dimadick ( talk) 17:41, 26 February 2024 (UTC) reply
  • Comment I thought I'd add that this category is no longer empty. Liz Read! Talk! 01:06, 1 March 2024 (UTC) reply

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: As of relisting, the category has one article in it ( Battle of Koyulhisar (1461)).
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, House Blaster ( talk · he/him) 00:50, 4 March 2024 (UTC) reply

  • Delete, with one article in it, the category is not helpful for navigation. That is on top of the issues mentioned earlier. Marcocapelle ( talk) 07:02, 4 March 2024 (UTC) reply
  • Delete per nom and Marcocapelle. It's OR and doesn't aid navigation. NLeeuw ( talk) 17:00, 4 March 2024 (UTC) reply

The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Category:People with type 1 diabetes

Relisted, see Wikipedia:Categories for discussion/Log/2024 March 13#Category:People with type 1 diabetes

Hall of Fame navigational boxes

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: merge ( non-admin closure) Qwerfjkl talk 18:01, 13 March 2024 (UTC) reply
Nominator's rationale: Dual merge to parent categories; only has one category layer each. Omnis Scientia ( talk) 00:39, 4 March 2024 (UTC) reply

The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Category:1803 American novels

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: merge ( non-admin closure) Qwerfjkl talk 18:01, 13 March 2024 (UTC) reply
Nominator's rationale: Upmerge for now. There's only one book in here, which is unhelpful for navigation Mason ( talk) 00:05, 4 March 2024 (UTC) reply
  • Support per nom, provided that these merges are further expanded in the 19th century. Marcocapelle ( talk) 07:15, 4 March 2024 (UTC) reply
    Yep, happy to do that. I wanted to make sure that my idea was viable before I implemented it. :) Mason ( talk) 14:56, 4 March 2024 (UTC) reply

The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

March 4

Category:Arab-Jewish culture in the United States

Relisted, see Wikipedia:Categories for discussion/Log/2024 March 13#Category:Arab-Jewish culture in the United States


Category:Texts by date

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: rename ( non-admin closure) Qwerfjkl talk 17:44, 13 March 2024 (UTC) reply
Nominator's rationale: rename, "period" is a better descriptor considering the content of the category. Marcocapelle ( talk) 18:14, 4 March 2024 (UTC) reply

The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Category:Harold B. Lee Library-related film articles

Relisted, see Wikipedia:Categories for discussion/Log/2024 March 13#Category:Harold B. Lee Library-related film articles


Category:Rolex sponsorships

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: delete ( non-admin closure) Qwerfjkl talk 17:47, 13 March 2024 (UTC) reply
Nominator's rationale: These events are not defined by having Rolex as a sponsor. User:Namiba 14:49, 4 March 2024 (UTC) reply
Support per nom Mason ( talk) 14:58, 4 March 2024 (UTC) reply

The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Category:Gallery pages of Landscapes of Tajikistan

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: speedy delete per author request. plicit 11:41, 5 March 2024 (UTC) reply
Nominator's rationale: Misapplication of categorization. — Alalch E. 13:54, 4 March 2024 (UTC) reply
I don't mind deleting categories, there was an error in the definition ( talk) 02:34, 5 March 2024 (UTC) reply
  • Meanwhile all four categories are empty, but based on the category names I suppose they contained files, and we already have dedicated files categories. Marcocapelle ( talk) 18:57, 4 March 2024 (UTC) reply

The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.


Category:University linguistics organizations

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: merge ( non-admin closure) Qwerfjkl talk 17:47, 13 March 2024 (UTC) reply
Nominator's rationale: Non-defining. These are organizations that happen to be at universities. That's not very helpful when linguistics is an academic field, so the norm is that organizations are connected with higher education in some way Mason ( talk) 04:52, 4 March 2024 (UTC) reply
  • Merge, linguistics organizations are naturally linked to universities and colleges. Marcocapelle ( talk) 06:30, 4 March 2024 (UTC) reply

The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.


Category:University of the Arctic

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: merge ( non-admin closure) Qwerfjkl talk 17:47, 13 March 2024 (UTC) reply
Nominator's rationale: Upmerge for now. Only two pages in here, which isn't helpful for navigation. Mason ( talk) 04:50, 4 March 2024 (UTC) reply

The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.


Category:University of Wyoming colleges

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: merge ( non-admin closure) Qwerfjkl talk 17:47, 13 March 2024 (UTC) reply
Nominator's rationale: Upmerge for now. Only one school in here, which is unhelpful for navigation Mason ( talk) 04:47, 4 March 2024 (UTC) reply

The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Category:Politicians killed in World War II

Relisted, see Wikipedia:Categories for discussion/Log/2024 March 13#Category:Politicians killed in World War II

Category:Deaths by stabbing in Rome

Relisted, see Wikipedia:Categories for discussion/Log/2024 March 13#Category:Deaths by stabbing in Rome

Category:Reportedly haunted locations in Raleigh, North Carolina

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: merge to Category:Reportedly haunted locations in North Carolina. (non-admin closure) Qwerfjkl talk 17:49, 13 March 2024 (UTC) reply
Nominator's rationale: Upmerge for now. Only on page in here, which is unhelpful for navigaiton Mason ( talk) 03:37, 4 March 2024 (UTC) reply

The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.


Category:Residential skyscrapers in Raleigh, North Carolina

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: merge ( non-admin closure) Qwerfjkl talk 17:50, 13 March 2024 (UTC) reply
Nominator's rationale: Upmerge for now. There's only one page in here, not helpful for navigaiton Mason ( talk) 03:34, 4 March 2024 (UTC) reply

The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.


Category:19th-century Filipino economists

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: merge ( non-admin closure) Qwerfjkl talk 17:50, 13 March 2024 (UTC) reply
Nominator's rationale: upmerge for now. Only one page in here. Mason ( talk) 02:34, 4 March 2024 (UTC) reply

The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Category:1905 German-language novels

Relisted, see Wikipedia:Categories for discussion/Log/2024 March 13#Category:1905 German-language novels


Category:Fictional transhumans

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: delete ( non-admin closure) Qwerfjkl talk 18:02, 13 March 2024 (UTC) reply
Nominator's rationale: This category and its related subcategories completely misunderstands the definition of "transhuman". These are all superhumans, not transhumans, which is a much more specific thing. There are fictional transhumans (Newtypes from Gundam come to mind) but none are actually listed here. We already have a category Category:Fictional superhumans so this is not necessary. ᴢxᴄᴠʙɴᴍ ( ) 00:58, 25 February 2024 (UTC) reply
Oppose. Your reasoning for deleting this category are just a subjective interpretation of what "transhuman" means. Maybe there's some overlap between "superhuman" and "transhuman", but I don't see a reason to just get rid of the category altogether. AHI-3000 ( talk) 04:48, 25 February 2024 (UTC) reply
Either you see them as identical to superhumans, which appears to be your view, in which case I don't understand why they should be separate. Or you see it as a specific case of "human evolved to be something superior to humans", which is much more specific than simply being, say, a vampire or undead, which can just as easily be monsters. That would mean this category should not be here unless someone can isolate the specific characters that apply. ᴢxᴄᴠʙɴᴍ ( ) 16:52, 25 February 2024 (UTC) reply
  • A transhuman is defined as "a being that resembles a human in most respects but who has powers and abilities beyond those of standard humans". While superhumans are defined as "humans, human-like beings or beings with qualities and abilities that exceed those naturally found in humans". That is too close to keep apart. Support nomination (though perhaps it should be a merge instead of deletion). Marcocapelle ( talk) 07:11, 25 February 2024 (UTC) reply
  • I am striking the "perhaps merge" part of my comment. Zxcvbnm is right that the category contains monsters rather than superhumans. Marcocapelle ( talk) 18:16, 25 February 2024 (UTC) reply
Oppose Transhumanism is the basic idea of transforming humans into "beings with abilities so greatly expanded from the current condition as to merit the label of posthuman beings." The concept typically covers "a new intelligent species, into which humanity will evolve and eventually will supplement or supersede it. " Dimadick ( talk) 17:59, 26 February 2024 (UTC) reply
My argument is that the category contains no transhumans, so it is a misnomer. You are answering the strawman argument of whether transhumans are notable. ᴢxᴄᴠʙɴᴍ ( ) 19:10, 26 February 2024 (UTC) reply

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, House Blaster ( talk · he/him) 00:55, 4 March 2024 (UTC) reply


The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.


Category:Ottoman-Azerbaijani wars

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: delete ( non-admin closure) Qwerfjkl talk 18:02, 13 March 2024 (UTC) reply
Nominator's rationale: Anachronistic and revisionist to use "Azerbaijani" in this era and especially to use it when referring to the Turkoman Aq Qoyunlu, and thus unsurprisingly not even used in WP:RS. I already tried to explain it to the creator of the category but to no avail [1]. HistoryofIran ( talk) 14:38, 25 February 2024 (UTC) reply
Yeah, this is the second time the user has created this category (the first time it got deleted for being emptied when I reverted them). The reason I took it here this time is so we have a documented reason for its deletion. I'm not sure if Category:Ottoman-Aq Qoyunlu wars is useful because I'm not sure if Aq Qoyunlu and Ottomans have had a "war" per se? Conflict sure, but something described as a "war" by scholars? Not so sure. A quick glance at ebooks didn't show anything. -- HistoryofIran ( talk) 23:00, 25 February 2024 (UTC) reply
The main article on Aq Qoyunlu covers Ottoman participation in power struggles over the Aq Qoyunlu's leadership position in the 1490s and the 1500s. Dimadick ( talk) 17:41, 26 February 2024 (UTC) reply
  • Comment I thought I'd add that this category is no longer empty. Liz Read! Talk! 01:06, 1 March 2024 (UTC) reply

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: As of relisting, the category has one article in it ( Battle of Koyulhisar (1461)).
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, House Blaster ( talk · he/him) 00:50, 4 March 2024 (UTC) reply

  • Delete, with one article in it, the category is not helpful for navigation. That is on top of the issues mentioned earlier. Marcocapelle ( talk) 07:02, 4 March 2024 (UTC) reply
  • Delete per nom and Marcocapelle. It's OR and doesn't aid navigation. NLeeuw ( talk) 17:00, 4 March 2024 (UTC) reply

The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Category:People with type 1 diabetes

Relisted, see Wikipedia:Categories for discussion/Log/2024 March 13#Category:People with type 1 diabetes

Hall of Fame navigational boxes

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: merge ( non-admin closure) Qwerfjkl talk 18:01, 13 March 2024 (UTC) reply
Nominator's rationale: Dual merge to parent categories; only has one category layer each. Omnis Scientia ( talk) 00:39, 4 March 2024 (UTC) reply

The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Category:1803 American novels

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: merge ( non-admin closure) Qwerfjkl talk 18:01, 13 March 2024 (UTC) reply
Nominator's rationale: Upmerge for now. There's only one book in here, which is unhelpful for navigation Mason ( talk) 00:05, 4 March 2024 (UTC) reply
  • Support per nom, provided that these merges are further expanded in the 19th century. Marcocapelle ( talk) 07:15, 4 March 2024 (UTC) reply
    Yep, happy to do that. I wanted to make sure that my idea was viable before I implemented it. :) Mason ( talk) 14:56, 4 March 2024 (UTC) reply

The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Videos

Youtube | Vimeo | Bing

Websites

Google | Yahoo | Bing

Encyclopedia

Google | Yahoo | Bing

Facebook