The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
Category:Convocations of the Mazhilis
The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus. Relisting comment: Merge target? Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Qwerfjkltalk 18:06, 25 January 2024 (UTC)reply
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus. Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Qwerfjkltalk 17:42, 2 February 2024 (UTC)reply
The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
Category:2115 films
The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
Strong Keep, have been watching this for years. Yes, one entry, but more importantly, this is a legitimate category for "films released". Not broken, not irregular, but a category which fits in with all the other yearly categories. Several years in the 1870s and 1880s contain one film apiece, as does 1893. Are we going to get rid of those too? No, because keeping films separated by years fulfills the mission of the films-per-year category concept.
Randy Kryn (
talk) 23:41, 12 February 2024 (UTC)reply
Merge per nom.
Mason (
talk) 02:21, 13 February 2024 (UTC)reply
Another point, taking the Wikipedia logo into consideration, its concept of an open-ended ongoing continued collaboration communicates outright that the encyclopedia will never be completed (the symbolism purposely portrayed as the missing piece of the open globe). Other single-year film categories exist (some categories 1874 to 1887, and 1893, include only one film per year). Are the "merge" people saying that Wikipedia won't be around in 2115? Either it will be or it won't be, but, per the "Wikipedia will never be completed" part of its vision and mission, we have to assume, in good faith, that it will, and that we are building an encyclopedia for the readers of 2115. From that perspective this is an easy keep.
Randy Kryn (
talk) 04:00, 13 February 2024 (UTC)reply
Not saying that Wikipedia won't be around in 2115. But it will only be helpful for easy navigation between films articles when we create the category a year in advance, like currently
Category:2025 films.
Marcocapelle (
talk) 07:25, 13 February 2024 (UTC)reply
Merge Per nom, it's unlikely to get any larger than one film for... well, as long as it will matter for most people. Merging doesn't imply there will be no future, just that a category is unnecessary.
ᴢxᴄᴠʙɴᴍ (
ᴛ) 00:32, 15 February 2024 (UTC)reply
The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
Category:University of South Florida olympians
The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
I can confirm that all articles are in an appropriate subcategory.--
User:Namiba 15:13, 14 February 2024 (UTC)reply
The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
Category:Belarusian-language newspapers published in the United States
The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
Category:Cultural infrastructure by year of completion
The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
Nominator's rationale: The question of the usefulness of this category tree was first brought up at
this discussion. I'm not sure that cultural infrastructure is a useful category for the establishments/completed in tree. There is no
Category:Cultural infrastucture or
Cultural infrastructure. –
Aidan721 (
talk) 18:06, 12 February 2024 (UTC)reply
Merge all to the buildings and structures category of the same year. While "cultural infrastructure" is an existing term, it is not a defining characteristic of museums, theathres etc.
Marcocapelle (
talk) 18:36, 12 February 2024 (UTC)reply
Merge all to the buildings and structures category of the same year. I expected to iVote "keep" since I use these a lot but, without a
Cultural infrastructure main article, there's no clear scope and it becomes
WP:SUBJECTIVECAT. -
RevelationDirect (
talk) 17:50, 14 February 2024 (UTC)reply
@
Qwerfjkl: Yes, the decades and century should follow suit as Marcocapelle and RevelationDirect alternatively suggested. –
Aidan721 (
talk) 19:14, 20 February 2024 (UTC)reply
The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
Museums disestablished in the 17th century
The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
Delete, or possibly merge (but it wasn't really an organisation) per above.
Marcocapelle (
talk) 18:28, 12 February 2024 (UTC)reply
The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
Category:1980s Indian superhero films
The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
Nominator's rationale: Underpopulated. All content transferred to the categories "Indian superhero films" and"1980s superhero films". Kailash29792(talk) 08:45, 12 February 2024 (UTC)reply
Procedural oppose. There is no reason to pick out the 1980s or 2000s from the tree. –
Aidan721 (
talk) 17:34, 12 February 2024 (UTC)reply
Oppose per above. And I also think there is good chance for more articles to be made to fit into the underpopulated categories.
★Trekker (
talk) 15:38, 15 February 2024 (UTC)reply
The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
Category:2000s Indian superhero films
The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
Nominator's rationale: Underpopulated. All content transferred to categories "Indian superhero films" and "2000s superhero films". Kailash29792(talk) 08:42, 12 February 2024 (UTC)reply
Procedural oppose. There is no reason to pick out the 1980s or 2000s from the tree. –
Aidan721 (
talk) 17:34, 12 February 2024 (UTC)reply
The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
Category:Free and open-source software organizations based in EU
The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was:merge/delete. Content comes before categories.
(non-admin closure)Qwerfjkltalk 17:04, 20 February 2024 (UTC)reply
Nominator's rationale: Upmerge. There's no need to difussion by the intersection of EU and type of organization. (I've only selected one merge target because this is the only category in Organizations based in EU, which doesn't help navigation)
Mason (
talk) 03:20, 12 February 2024 (UTC)reply
Rationale of this category is that not many FLOSS projects have registered NGO in EU, but this is to be changing as EU has started actively supporting development of software that is alternative to big corporate US developers as an attempt in creating less dependence and more sustainable autonomy and especially so in FLOSS. There is more funding then before and policies are adapting to favor such tech. --
Zblace (
talk) 06:24, 20 February 2024 (UTC)reply
The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
Category:Personifications in mythology and religion
The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
Category:Winona State Warriors football seasons
The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
Category:Fictional rivalries
The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
Nominator's rationale: This doesn't contain any articles specifically about fictional rivalries, only works that contain rivalries. Another possibility is renaming it
Category:Fiction about rivalry, but I'm not certain something like that is necessary.
ᴢxᴄᴠʙɴᴍ (
ᴛ) 00:15, 12 February 2024 (UTC)reply
The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
Category:Convocations of the Mazhilis
The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus. Relisting comment: Merge target? Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Qwerfjkltalk 18:06, 25 January 2024 (UTC)reply
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus. Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Qwerfjkltalk 17:42, 2 February 2024 (UTC)reply
The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
Category:2115 films
The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
Strong Keep, have been watching this for years. Yes, one entry, but more importantly, this is a legitimate category for "films released". Not broken, not irregular, but a category which fits in with all the other yearly categories. Several years in the 1870s and 1880s contain one film apiece, as does 1893. Are we going to get rid of those too? No, because keeping films separated by years fulfills the mission of the films-per-year category concept.
Randy Kryn (
talk) 23:41, 12 February 2024 (UTC)reply
Merge per nom.
Mason (
talk) 02:21, 13 February 2024 (UTC)reply
Another point, taking the Wikipedia logo into consideration, its concept of an open-ended ongoing continued collaboration communicates outright that the encyclopedia will never be completed (the symbolism purposely portrayed as the missing piece of the open globe). Other single-year film categories exist (some categories 1874 to 1887, and 1893, include only one film per year). Are the "merge" people saying that Wikipedia won't be around in 2115? Either it will be or it won't be, but, per the "Wikipedia will never be completed" part of its vision and mission, we have to assume, in good faith, that it will, and that we are building an encyclopedia for the readers of 2115. From that perspective this is an easy keep.
Randy Kryn (
talk) 04:00, 13 February 2024 (UTC)reply
Not saying that Wikipedia won't be around in 2115. But it will only be helpful for easy navigation between films articles when we create the category a year in advance, like currently
Category:2025 films.
Marcocapelle (
talk) 07:25, 13 February 2024 (UTC)reply
Merge Per nom, it's unlikely to get any larger than one film for... well, as long as it will matter for most people. Merging doesn't imply there will be no future, just that a category is unnecessary.
ᴢxᴄᴠʙɴᴍ (
ᴛ) 00:32, 15 February 2024 (UTC)reply
The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
Category:University of South Florida olympians
The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
I can confirm that all articles are in an appropriate subcategory.--
User:Namiba 15:13, 14 February 2024 (UTC)reply
The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
Category:Belarusian-language newspapers published in the United States
The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
Category:Cultural infrastructure by year of completion
The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
Nominator's rationale: The question of the usefulness of this category tree was first brought up at
this discussion. I'm not sure that cultural infrastructure is a useful category for the establishments/completed in tree. There is no
Category:Cultural infrastucture or
Cultural infrastructure. –
Aidan721 (
talk) 18:06, 12 February 2024 (UTC)reply
Merge all to the buildings and structures category of the same year. While "cultural infrastructure" is an existing term, it is not a defining characteristic of museums, theathres etc.
Marcocapelle (
talk) 18:36, 12 February 2024 (UTC)reply
Merge all to the buildings and structures category of the same year. I expected to iVote "keep" since I use these a lot but, without a
Cultural infrastructure main article, there's no clear scope and it becomes
WP:SUBJECTIVECAT. -
RevelationDirect (
talk) 17:50, 14 February 2024 (UTC)reply
@
Qwerfjkl: Yes, the decades and century should follow suit as Marcocapelle and RevelationDirect alternatively suggested. –
Aidan721 (
talk) 19:14, 20 February 2024 (UTC)reply
The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
Museums disestablished in the 17th century
The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
Delete, or possibly merge (but it wasn't really an organisation) per above.
Marcocapelle (
talk) 18:28, 12 February 2024 (UTC)reply
The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
Category:1980s Indian superhero films
The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
Nominator's rationale: Underpopulated. All content transferred to the categories "Indian superhero films" and"1980s superhero films". Kailash29792(talk) 08:45, 12 February 2024 (UTC)reply
Procedural oppose. There is no reason to pick out the 1980s or 2000s from the tree. –
Aidan721 (
talk) 17:34, 12 February 2024 (UTC)reply
Oppose per above. And I also think there is good chance for more articles to be made to fit into the underpopulated categories.
★Trekker (
talk) 15:38, 15 February 2024 (UTC)reply
The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
Category:2000s Indian superhero films
The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
Nominator's rationale: Underpopulated. All content transferred to categories "Indian superhero films" and "2000s superhero films". Kailash29792(talk) 08:42, 12 February 2024 (UTC)reply
Procedural oppose. There is no reason to pick out the 1980s or 2000s from the tree. –
Aidan721 (
talk) 17:34, 12 February 2024 (UTC)reply
The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
Category:Free and open-source software organizations based in EU
The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was:merge/delete. Content comes before categories.
(non-admin closure)Qwerfjkltalk 17:04, 20 February 2024 (UTC)reply
Nominator's rationale: Upmerge. There's no need to difussion by the intersection of EU and type of organization. (I've only selected one merge target because this is the only category in Organizations based in EU, which doesn't help navigation)
Mason (
talk) 03:20, 12 February 2024 (UTC)reply
Rationale of this category is that not many FLOSS projects have registered NGO in EU, but this is to be changing as EU has started actively supporting development of software that is alternative to big corporate US developers as an attempt in creating less dependence and more sustainable autonomy and especially so in FLOSS. There is more funding then before and policies are adapting to favor such tech. --
Zblace (
talk) 06:24, 20 February 2024 (UTC)reply
The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
Category:Personifications in mythology and religion
The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
Category:Winona State Warriors football seasons
The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
Category:Fictional rivalries
The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
Nominator's rationale: This doesn't contain any articles specifically about fictional rivalries, only works that contain rivalries. Another possibility is renaming it
Category:Fiction about rivalry, but I'm not certain something like that is necessary.
ᴢxᴄᴠʙɴᴍ (
ᴛ) 00:15, 12 February 2024 (UTC)reply
The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.