The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was keep.
Daniel (
talk) 10:53, 14 December 2023 (UTC)reply
Keep - the SIGCOV from Nemec's book and the Cincinnati Enquirer article means Bloggs meets GNG. There's also a bit about him in
this, though I wouldn't rely on it to establish notability.
Hatman31 (
talk) 02:19, 8 December 2023 (UTC)reply
Keep. There is enough out there to establish notability and these 19th century players need to be given a bit more leeway.
Spanneraol (
talk) 02:21, 8 December 2023 (UTC)reply
Keep. Appears to pass WP:GNG.
BeanieFan11 (
talk) 16:50, 8 December 2023 (UTC)reply
Keep: Based on his book entry and the other sources mentioned above.
Oaktree b (
talk) 17:04, 8 December 2023 (UTC)reply
Keep Notable enough to pass GNG.
Kkb091 (
talk) 19:06, 13 December 2023 (UTC)reply
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was keep.
Daniel (
talk) 10:53, 14 December 2023 (UTC)reply
Keep - the SIGCOV from Nemec's book and the Cincinnati Enquirer article means Bloggs meets GNG. There's also a bit about him in
this, though I wouldn't rely on it to establish notability.
Hatman31 (
talk) 02:19, 8 December 2023 (UTC)reply
Keep. There is enough out there to establish notability and these 19th century players need to be given a bit more leeway.
Spanneraol (
talk) 02:21, 8 December 2023 (UTC)reply
Keep. Appears to pass WP:GNG.
BeanieFan11 (
talk) 16:50, 8 December 2023 (UTC)reply
Keep: Based on his book entry and the other sources mentioned above.
Oaktree b (
talk) 17:04, 8 December 2023 (UTC)reply
Keep Notable enough to pass GNG.
Kkb091 (
talk) 19:06, 13 December 2023 (UTC)reply
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.