The result was Keep Clear consensus on notability and sourcing. As per DGG, disagreeing with a person's position is not grounds for deletion. Mike Cline ( talk) 15:50, 26 March 2010 (UTC) reply
Not notable academic whose article only has a single citation. And most of the page consists of what is apparently advertising for his books that are published at "Future Horizons", a source fringe at best. UltraMagnus speak 19:50, 19 March 2010 (UTC) reply
Comment AfD wasn't properly formed (step 1 missing). I've fixed this and remain neutral. Dylanfromthenorth ( talk) 21:20, 19 March 2010 (UTC) reply
The result was Keep Clear consensus on notability and sourcing. As per DGG, disagreeing with a person's position is not grounds for deletion. Mike Cline ( talk) 15:50, 26 March 2010 (UTC) reply
Not notable academic whose article only has a single citation. And most of the page consists of what is apparently advertising for his books that are published at "Future Horizons", a source fringe at best. UltraMagnus speak 19:50, 19 March 2010 (UTC) reply
Comment AfD wasn't properly formed (step 1 missing). I've fixed this and remain neutral. Dylanfromthenorth ( talk) 21:20, 19 March 2010 (UTC) reply