- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was
WP:SNOW delete.
BD2412
T 22:49, 16 December 2022 (UTC)
The Manufacturing of Greta Thunberg (book)
[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!
- The Manufacturing of Greta Thunberg (book) ( | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – ( View log | edits since nomination)
- (Find sources: Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Non-notable self-published hit job, horrible sourcing and total WP:FRINGE violation Orange Mike | Talk 00:58, 10 December 2022 (UTC)
- Delete Orangemike beat me to it while I was reading the sources provided. WP:NBOOK and WP:TNT both apply. Even if this book were shown to be notable, we'd be better off starting from a blank page than having this version of the article in the history. VQuakr ( talk) 01:25, 10 December 2022 (UTC)
- Delete. Fails WP:GNG/ WP:BK. Absolutely awful. Woodroar ( talk) 01:26, 10 December 2022 (UTC)
- Delete. An utterly non-encyclopaedic mess, on a non-notable subject. AndyTheGrump ( talk) 01:28, 10 December 2022 (UTC)
- Delete I was concerned before it was noted that it was self published. That just seals the deal that this fails GNG as a topic while the article as is fails V, NPOV and BLP. Slywriter ( talk) 01:33, 10 December 2022 (UTC)
- Delete I can find exactly zero RS reviewing this book, therefore fails NBOOK. Hemiauchenia ( talk) 01:42, 10 December 2022 (UTC)
- Delete Only book this guy has, and not even available on Kindle. Twopower332.1938 ( talk) 02:21, 10 December 2022 (UTC)
- Delete, and I'm concerned about other edits made recently by the editor who created this article. Discussion appears to be underway in two sections at the NPOV noticeboard. ezlev ( user/ tlk/ ctrbs) 03:17, 10 December 2022 (UTC)
- Delete I’m surprised that this was reviewed and passed at NPP. Mccapra ( talk) 04:31, 10 December 2022 (UTC)
- Delete - Fails WP:NBOOK and lacks any WP:RS Pranesh Ravikumar ( talk) 05:06, 10 December 2022 (UTC)
- Thank you very much for critical view and listing the problems with the article. You are welcome to help and to sort (out) the sources, so I can take something for the future. Geysirhead ( talk) 07:06, 10 December 2022 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Literature-related deletion discussions. Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 12:12, 10 December 2022 (UTC)
- Delete The main source this article brelies upon is from thefifthestate.com.au, a site that appears maybe reliable. However the source cited is from it's Spinifex section, a submissions based opinion section and so not reliable. None of the other cited sources appear to show notability, and I can't find any better online. -- LCU ActivelyDisinterested ∆ transmissions∆ ° co-ords° 17:43, 10 December 2022 (UTC)
- Delete This isn't actually a book, but a self-published compilation of opinion articles and blog entries, along with overabuse of fair use by strip-mining the book subject's social media presences to attempt to 'gotcha!' a teenager. NBOOK, GNG fails easily, and this needs to be TNT'ed. Nate • ( chatter) 20:47, 10 December 2022 (UTC)
- Delete completely non-notable. Partofthemachine ( talk) 02:27, 11 December 2022 (UTC)
- Delete obviously. Completely non-notable and non-neutral. Non-RS and non-SIGCOV references does not make
WP:GNG or
WP:NBOOK passed. P.S. A previous version reviewed by a NPP stated
F. William Engdahl deliveres a scrupulous and well-documented analysis of “grass roots” decarbonization movement published in New Eastern Outlook, and cites Morningstar's book, which tries to expose the "bluff" of climate correctness
andThe role of Greta's mother, Malena Ernman, is regarded as suspicious
- unfortunately, I'm afraid that I couldn't understand how this passed WP:NPP and was marked as reviewed without any tags. VickKiang (talk) 09:00, 11 December 2022 (UTC) - Delete Like everyone else is saying, fails WP:NBOOK. Balon Greyjoy ( talk) 22:10, 13 December 2022 (UTC)
- Delete For all the reasons above. Time to invoke WP:SNOW PianoDan ( talk) 00:04, 16 December 2022 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was
WP:SNOW delete.
BD2412
T 22:49, 16 December 2022 (UTC)
The Manufacturing of Greta Thunberg (book)
[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!
- The Manufacturing of Greta Thunberg (book) ( | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – ( View log | edits since nomination)
- (Find sources: Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Non-notable self-published hit job, horrible sourcing and total WP:FRINGE violation Orange Mike | Talk 00:58, 10 December 2022 (UTC)
- Delete Orangemike beat me to it while I was reading the sources provided. WP:NBOOK and WP:TNT both apply. Even if this book were shown to be notable, we'd be better off starting from a blank page than having this version of the article in the history. VQuakr ( talk) 01:25, 10 December 2022 (UTC)
- Delete. Fails WP:GNG/ WP:BK. Absolutely awful. Woodroar ( talk) 01:26, 10 December 2022 (UTC)
- Delete. An utterly non-encyclopaedic mess, on a non-notable subject. AndyTheGrump ( talk) 01:28, 10 December 2022 (UTC)
- Delete I was concerned before it was noted that it was self published. That just seals the deal that this fails GNG as a topic while the article as is fails V, NPOV and BLP. Slywriter ( talk) 01:33, 10 December 2022 (UTC)
- Delete I can find exactly zero RS reviewing this book, therefore fails NBOOK. Hemiauchenia ( talk) 01:42, 10 December 2022 (UTC)
- Delete Only book this guy has, and not even available on Kindle. Twopower332.1938 ( talk) 02:21, 10 December 2022 (UTC)
- Delete, and I'm concerned about other edits made recently by the editor who created this article. Discussion appears to be underway in two sections at the NPOV noticeboard. ezlev ( user/ tlk/ ctrbs) 03:17, 10 December 2022 (UTC)
- Delete I’m surprised that this was reviewed and passed at NPP. Mccapra ( talk) 04:31, 10 December 2022 (UTC)
- Delete - Fails WP:NBOOK and lacks any WP:RS Pranesh Ravikumar ( talk) 05:06, 10 December 2022 (UTC)
- Thank you very much for critical view and listing the problems with the article. You are welcome to help and to sort (out) the sources, so I can take something for the future. Geysirhead ( talk) 07:06, 10 December 2022 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Literature-related deletion discussions. Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 12:12, 10 December 2022 (UTC)
- Delete The main source this article brelies upon is from thefifthestate.com.au, a site that appears maybe reliable. However the source cited is from it's Spinifex section, a submissions based opinion section and so not reliable. None of the other cited sources appear to show notability, and I can't find any better online. -- LCU ActivelyDisinterested ∆ transmissions∆ ° co-ords° 17:43, 10 December 2022 (UTC)
- Delete This isn't actually a book, but a self-published compilation of opinion articles and blog entries, along with overabuse of fair use by strip-mining the book subject's social media presences to attempt to 'gotcha!' a teenager. NBOOK, GNG fails easily, and this needs to be TNT'ed. Nate • ( chatter) 20:47, 10 December 2022 (UTC)
- Delete completely non-notable. Partofthemachine ( talk) 02:27, 11 December 2022 (UTC)
- Delete obviously. Completely non-notable and non-neutral. Non-RS and non-SIGCOV references does not make
WP:GNG or
WP:NBOOK passed. P.S. A previous version reviewed by a NPP stated
F. William Engdahl deliveres a scrupulous and well-documented analysis of “grass roots” decarbonization movement published in New Eastern Outlook, and cites Morningstar's book, which tries to expose the "bluff" of climate correctness
andThe role of Greta's mother, Malena Ernman, is regarded as suspicious
- unfortunately, I'm afraid that I couldn't understand how this passed WP:NPP and was marked as reviewed without any tags. VickKiang (talk) 09:00, 11 December 2022 (UTC) - Delete Like everyone else is saying, fails WP:NBOOK. Balon Greyjoy ( talk) 22:10, 13 December 2022 (UTC)
- Delete For all the reasons above. Time to invoke WP:SNOW PianoDan ( talk) 00:04, 16 December 2022 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.