The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
Does not fulfill the requirements for
WP:Notability, not enough indepedent sigcov could be found either in the article or through own search.
WP:NACADEMICS is not met either.
FortunateSons (
talk) 10:14, 16 April 2024 (UTC)reply
Delete (nominator) All independent coverage is very minor and focussed on some area of research, I could not find enough coverage that is both significant and independent. No indication of meeting WP:NACADEMICS could be found. Almost all content is sourced from obviously non-independent sources.FortunateSons (
talk) 10:37, 16 April 2024 (UTC)reply
A nomination is already a vote for deletion, please remove your bolded vote. You're just restating your nomination. nableezy - 03:34, 18 April 2024 (UTC)reply
Um, in English one writes 'struck', unless you are thinking of 'stricken', which is something commonplace in I/P realities.
Nishidani (
talk) 11:45, 18 April 2024 (UTC)reply
Ah, that was a poor translation from my native language, my bad
FortunateSons (
talk) 11:47, 18 April 2024 (UTC)reply
Keep. Especially with the new additions, the article adequately establishes notability.
Zerotalk 01:20, 19 April 2024 (UTC)reply
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
Does not fulfill the requirements for
WP:Notability, not enough indepedent sigcov could be found either in the article or through own search.
WP:NACADEMICS is not met either.
FortunateSons (
talk) 10:14, 16 April 2024 (UTC)reply
Delete (nominator) All independent coverage is very minor and focussed on some area of research, I could not find enough coverage that is both significant and independent. No indication of meeting WP:NACADEMICS could be found. Almost all content is sourced from obviously non-independent sources.FortunateSons (
talk) 10:37, 16 April 2024 (UTC)reply
A nomination is already a vote for deletion, please remove your bolded vote. You're just restating your nomination. nableezy - 03:34, 18 April 2024 (UTC)reply
Um, in English one writes 'struck', unless you are thinking of 'stricken', which is something commonplace in I/P realities.
Nishidani (
talk) 11:45, 18 April 2024 (UTC)reply
Ah, that was a poor translation from my native language, my bad
FortunateSons (
talk) 11:47, 18 April 2024 (UTC)reply
Keep. Especially with the new additions, the article adequately establishes notability.
Zerotalk 01:20, 19 April 2024 (UTC)reply
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.