The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete‎. Consensus is sourcing is of insufficient depth Star Mississippi 10:53, 6 April 2024 (UTC) reply

Sri Yala Batik

Sri Yala Batik (  | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – ( View log | edits since nomination)

(Find sources:  Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

The company doesn't seem notable as there is no significant coverage in third-party reliable sources. The sources found so far only briefly mention it, and checking WP:BEFORE reveals the same pattern of passing mentions. Fails WP:CORPDEPTH. GSS  ^💬 19:52, 8 March 2024 (UTC) reply

• Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Companies and Thailand. GSS  ^💬 19:52, 8 March 2024 (UTC) reply
• Keep. Significant coverage in third-party reliable sources, including the online arms of Kom Chad Luek (2011) [1], Manager (2018) [2], Matichon (2022) [3], and a documentary broadcast on PPTV (2023) [4]. The last two are already cited in the article. There's room to discuss adjusting the article scope to cover the textile itself rather than the group (which is its only producer), but that's a matter for the article talk page. -- Paul_012 ( talk) 23:16, 8 March 2024 (UTC) reply

As previously mentioned, these are merely passing mentions and do not meet the requirements of WP:CORPDEPTH. All three sources you mentioned rely solely on statements made by its founder, as indicated by the phrase "Piya said" throughout the articles. GSS  ^💬 04:30, 9 March 2024 (UTC) reply

Those articles are entirely about the group's textile making, and are certainly not mere passing mentions. A news source reporting information from subject is still independent if such information has been vetted and fact-checked by the reporter. -- Paul_012 ( talk) 09:52, 9 March 2024 (UTC) reply

• Delete – fails notability guidelines; I can only find this that can pass but not enough to establish notability other than mentions. Toadette ^{( Let's discuss together!)} 06:32, 11 March 2024 (UTC) reply
• Keep I am confident in the sources provided above by editor Paul. 180.183.224.201 ( talk) 19:13, 11 March 2024 (UTC) reply

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 23:29, 15 March 2024 (UTC) reply

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 22:31, 22 March 2024 (UTC) reply

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: Final relist.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, The Herald (Benison) ( talk) 06:08, 30 March 2024 (UTC) reply

• Delete. Nothing significant presented; merely passing mentions. Fails CORPDEPTH. BusterD ( talk) 15:27, 5 April 2024 (UTC) reply

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.