From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. RL0919 ( talk) 04:18, 26 December 2019 (UTC) reply

Shunka Warakin

Shunka Warakin (  | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – ( View log · Stats)
(Find sources:  Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Fails GNG due to lack of significant coverage in reliable sources. WP:BEFORE search returned cryptozoological fringe sources that cannot be used to establish notability or write a balanced article. Before cleanup, article consisted mainly of wolf sightings with no clear connection to the "shunka warakin" topic. – dlthewave 04:17, 19 December 2019 (UTC) reply

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Fictional elements-related deletion discussions. SharabSalam ( talk) 04:19, 19 December 2019 (UTC) reply
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Animal-related deletion discussions. SharabSalam ( talk) 04:19, 19 December 2019 (UTC) reply
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Mythology-related deletion discussions. SharabSalam ( talk) 04:31, 19 December 2019 (UTC) reply
  • Weak delete. There are more GBooks hits then I'd have thought, but none appear reliable (the accessible ones are self-published or fiction). No reliable GScholar hits. GNews results are like GBooks, some mentions, but niche/unreliable. Seems like non-notable, modern urban legend, unless someone finds a good source (if so, please ping me). -- Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| reply here 10:04, 19 December 2019 (UTC) reply
  • Weak delete Not seeing any real notability. But article was gutted before nomination. Slatersteven ( talk) 15:00, 20 December 2019 (UTC) reply
  • Delete due to lack of reliable sources. So what if the article was gutted before nomming. No Problems at all. - Roxy, the PROD. . wooF 16:20, 20 December 2019 (UTC) reply
  • Comment Mysterious Creatures makes Ringdocus AfD and Shunka Warak'in the same beast.— eric 17:19, 20 December 2019 (UTC) reply
  • Comment There shouldn't be any content under this title, it comes from a cryptologist, and would be a non-neutral redirect if the other article is kept. Piotrus you should probably look at the other Afd.— eric 17:52, 20 December 2019 (UTC) reply
  • Delete per other AfD, and name "Shunka Warak'in" invented by cryptozoologists.— eric 17:15, 21 December 2019 (UTC) reply
  • Delete due to lack of reliable sources, just the usual fringe inventions here, it seems. :bloodofox: ( talk) 19:17, 22 December 2019 (UTC) reply
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. RL0919 ( talk) 04:18, 26 December 2019 (UTC) reply

Shunka Warakin

Shunka Warakin (  | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – ( View log · Stats)
(Find sources:  Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Fails GNG due to lack of significant coverage in reliable sources. WP:BEFORE search returned cryptozoological fringe sources that cannot be used to establish notability or write a balanced article. Before cleanup, article consisted mainly of wolf sightings with no clear connection to the "shunka warakin" topic. – dlthewave 04:17, 19 December 2019 (UTC) reply

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Fictional elements-related deletion discussions. SharabSalam ( talk) 04:19, 19 December 2019 (UTC) reply
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Animal-related deletion discussions. SharabSalam ( talk) 04:19, 19 December 2019 (UTC) reply
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Mythology-related deletion discussions. SharabSalam ( talk) 04:31, 19 December 2019 (UTC) reply
  • Weak delete. There are more GBooks hits then I'd have thought, but none appear reliable (the accessible ones are self-published or fiction). No reliable GScholar hits. GNews results are like GBooks, some mentions, but niche/unreliable. Seems like non-notable, modern urban legend, unless someone finds a good source (if so, please ping me). -- Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| reply here 10:04, 19 December 2019 (UTC) reply
  • Weak delete Not seeing any real notability. But article was gutted before nomination. Slatersteven ( talk) 15:00, 20 December 2019 (UTC) reply
  • Delete due to lack of reliable sources. So what if the article was gutted before nomming. No Problems at all. - Roxy, the PROD. . wooF 16:20, 20 December 2019 (UTC) reply
  • Comment Mysterious Creatures makes Ringdocus AfD and Shunka Warak'in the same beast.— eric 17:19, 20 December 2019 (UTC) reply
  • Comment There shouldn't be any content under this title, it comes from a cryptologist, and would be a non-neutral redirect if the other article is kept. Piotrus you should probably look at the other Afd.— eric 17:52, 20 December 2019 (UTC) reply
  • Delete per other AfD, and name "Shunka Warak'in" invented by cryptozoologists.— eric 17:15, 21 December 2019 (UTC) reply
  • Delete due to lack of reliable sources, just the usual fringe inventions here, it seems. :bloodofox: ( talk) 19:17, 22 December 2019 (UTC) reply
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

Videos

Youtube | Vimeo | Bing

Websites

Google | Yahoo | Bing

Encyclopedia

Google | Yahoo | Bing

Facebook