The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
Does not meet Notability requirements and has exactly zero references and sources — Preceding
unsigned comment added by
Death Editor 2 (
talk •
contribs)
Comment. Perhaps an editor with access to The Wikipedia Library or other premium databases will be able to find reviews of the book. I should point out that Roswell, Texas was a real community that should probably be the subject of an article. See
https://www.tshaonline.org/handbook/entries/roswell-txEastmain (
talk •
contribs) 23:12, 8 August 2023 (UTC)reply
Redirect to
L. Neil Smith. I found a brief review[1] and a mention in Encyclopedia of Weird Westerns[2] but not enough to support
notability as a stand-alone article.
Schazjmd(talk) 23:16, 8 August 2023 (UTC)reply
in my personal opinion, I think it should just be mentioned in the published works section of the article.
Death Editor 2 (
talk) 01:03, 9 August 2023 (UTC)reply
Based on what I see now, a redirect to Smith's article is appropriate. I'll check my webcomics books tonight to see if any of them mention this at all, but I doubt I'll find much there. ~
Maplestrip/Mable (
chat) 07:29, 9 August 2023 (UTC)reply
Redirect per Schazjmd. I haven't been able to find any sources beyond the Booklist review and Green encyclopaedia entry; none of the sources in the article seem to be reliable. As such, the sources are sufficient for a one- or two-sentence mention but not an article. –
Arms & Hearts (
talk) 15:25, 15 August 2023 (UTC)reply
References
^Hays, Carl (June 2008). "Rosewell, Texas". The Booklist. Vol. 104, no. 19/20. p. 61.
ProQuest235631640.
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
Does not meet Notability requirements and has exactly zero references and sources — Preceding
unsigned comment added by
Death Editor 2 (
talk •
contribs)
Comment. Perhaps an editor with access to The Wikipedia Library or other premium databases will be able to find reviews of the book. I should point out that Roswell, Texas was a real community that should probably be the subject of an article. See
https://www.tshaonline.org/handbook/entries/roswell-txEastmain (
talk •
contribs) 23:12, 8 August 2023 (UTC)reply
Redirect to
L. Neil Smith. I found a brief review[1] and a mention in Encyclopedia of Weird Westerns[2] but not enough to support
notability as a stand-alone article.
Schazjmd(talk) 23:16, 8 August 2023 (UTC)reply
in my personal opinion, I think it should just be mentioned in the published works section of the article.
Death Editor 2 (
talk) 01:03, 9 August 2023 (UTC)reply
Based on what I see now, a redirect to Smith's article is appropriate. I'll check my webcomics books tonight to see if any of them mention this at all, but I doubt I'll find much there. ~
Maplestrip/Mable (
chat) 07:29, 9 August 2023 (UTC)reply
Redirect per Schazjmd. I haven't been able to find any sources beyond the Booklist review and Green encyclopaedia entry; none of the sources in the article seem to be reliable. As such, the sources are sufficient for a one- or two-sentence mention but not an article. –
Arms & Hearts (
talk) 15:25, 15 August 2023 (UTC)reply
References
^Hays, Carl (June 2008). "Rosewell, Texas". The Booklist. Vol. 104, no. 19/20. p. 61.
ProQuest235631640.
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.