The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
I was unable to find enough reliable sources online to keep this article, especially since databases do not count towards notability.
QuicoleJR (
talk) 14:14, 10 August 2023 (UTC)reply
Comment Here are a couple of sources
[1][2]Alvaldi (
talk) 15:23, 10 August 2023 (UTC)reply
Bleacher Report does not seem to be a reliable source, and one good source is not enough to establish notability.
QuicoleJR (
talk) 15:40, 10 August 2023 (UTC)reply
(edit conflict) They seem to have a staff and they're cited on
over 7,000 articles; I would say its reliable unless a discussion decides otherwise.
BeanieFan11 (
talk) 15:50, 10 August 2023 (UTC)/reply
Keep - BeanieFan11 shows just enough coverage to meet GNG, although I am not including Bleacher Report since I am not sure it counts as RS.
Rlendog (
talk) 16:12, 10 August 2023 (UTC)reply
I have greatly improved the article, see
here. @
QuicoleJR: Would you be willing to withdraw this nomination?
BeanieFan11 (
talk) 16:44, 10 August 2023 (UTC)reply
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
I was unable to find enough reliable sources online to keep this article, especially since databases do not count towards notability.
QuicoleJR (
talk) 14:14, 10 August 2023 (UTC)reply
Comment Here are a couple of sources
[1][2]Alvaldi (
talk) 15:23, 10 August 2023 (UTC)reply
Bleacher Report does not seem to be a reliable source, and one good source is not enough to establish notability.
QuicoleJR (
talk) 15:40, 10 August 2023 (UTC)reply
(edit conflict) They seem to have a staff and they're cited on
over 7,000 articles; I would say its reliable unless a discussion decides otherwise.
BeanieFan11 (
talk) 15:50, 10 August 2023 (UTC)/reply
Keep - BeanieFan11 shows just enough coverage to meet GNG, although I am not including Bleacher Report since I am not sure it counts as RS.
Rlendog (
talk) 16:12, 10 August 2023 (UTC)reply
I have greatly improved the article, see
here. @
QuicoleJR: Would you be willing to withdraw this nomination?
BeanieFan11 (
talk) 16:44, 10 August 2023 (UTC)reply
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.