- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. Eddie891 Talk Work 18:52, 12 November 2020 (UTC)
Peter Mt. Shasta
[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!
- Peter Mt. Shasta ( | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – ( View log)
- (Find sources: Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Probably insufficiently notable for an article of his own. Much of the article appears to be a bibliography of his own works. GPinkerton ( talk) 17:15, 5 November 2020 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Spirituality-related deletion discussions. GPinkerton ( talk) 17:15, 5 November 2020 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the list of United States of America-related deletion discussions. GPinkerton ( talk) 17:15, 5 November 2020 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the list of California-related deletion discussions. GPinkerton ( talk) 17:15, 5 November 2020 (UTC)
- Delete. I can find no sources to indicate that this person passes WP:GNG, and the article is currently sourced to an interview, a bibliography and a mention in a book. The article appears to have been written as an autobiography, the article's main editor describes the photo used in the article as having been previously "published on my website: www.I-AM-Teachings.com". The other significant contributor to the article, GeorgeSanders1008 appears to be an alternate account or sockpuppet of the article's creator DharmaMountain, given that they are correcting unsourced statements with more unsourced statements and have only edited in the same subject area. 192.76.8.82 ( talk) 18:53, 5 November 2020 (UTC)
- Delete I don't think he's notable enough for an article due to lacking multiple in-depth reliable sources about him. Unfortunately that's hard to do in the "new age" movement, but the guidelines are the guidelines. -- Adamant1 ( talk) 19:02, 5 November 2020 (UTC)
- Delete Because of lack of reliable independent sources. Psychologist Guy ( talk) 21:15, 5 November 2020 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. Eddie891 Talk Work 18:52, 12 November 2020 (UTC)
Peter Mt. Shasta
[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!
- Peter Mt. Shasta ( | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – ( View log)
- (Find sources: Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Probably insufficiently notable for an article of his own. Much of the article appears to be a bibliography of his own works. GPinkerton ( talk) 17:15, 5 November 2020 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Spirituality-related deletion discussions. GPinkerton ( talk) 17:15, 5 November 2020 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the list of United States of America-related deletion discussions. GPinkerton ( talk) 17:15, 5 November 2020 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the list of California-related deletion discussions. GPinkerton ( talk) 17:15, 5 November 2020 (UTC)
- Delete. I can find no sources to indicate that this person passes WP:GNG, and the article is currently sourced to an interview, a bibliography and a mention in a book. The article appears to have been written as an autobiography, the article's main editor describes the photo used in the article as having been previously "published on my website: www.I-AM-Teachings.com". The other significant contributor to the article, GeorgeSanders1008 appears to be an alternate account or sockpuppet of the article's creator DharmaMountain, given that they are correcting unsourced statements with more unsourced statements and have only edited in the same subject area. 192.76.8.82 ( talk) 18:53, 5 November 2020 (UTC)
- Delete I don't think he's notable enough for an article due to lacking multiple in-depth reliable sources about him. Unfortunately that's hard to do in the "new age" movement, but the guidelines are the guidelines. -- Adamant1 ( talk) 19:02, 5 November 2020 (UTC)
- Delete Because of lack of reliable independent sources. Psychologist Guy ( talk) 21:15, 5 November 2020 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.