This discussion was subject to a
deletion review on 2011 March 1. For an explanation of the process, see Wikipedia:Deletion review. |
The result was keep. Although I disagree with the statement at the bottom that there is an "overwhelming" consensus, (not a vote and all that) there is a rough consensus to keep. Beeblebrox ( talk) 01:29, 1 March 2011 (UTC) reply
Aside from the fact that the article has been tagged as referenceless since March 2008 (that's 3 years), I don't believe there is any reason whatsoever to have an article which is a CONTENT FORK of the original Golden Globe awards article. The sole difference is that this article is based on all the black nominees and I find that highly trivial and unnecessary. All the black nominees are listed in their awards' appropriate article. There is no need to single them out here. Feed back ☎ 20:03, 21 February 2011 (UTC) Feed back ☎ 20:03, 21 February 2011 (UTC) reply
This discussion was subject to a
deletion review on 2011 March 1. For an explanation of the process, see Wikipedia:Deletion review. |
The result was keep. Although I disagree with the statement at the bottom that there is an "overwhelming" consensus, (not a vote and all that) there is a rough consensus to keep. Beeblebrox ( talk) 01:29, 1 March 2011 (UTC) reply
Aside from the fact that the article has been tagged as referenceless since March 2008 (that's 3 years), I don't believe there is any reason whatsoever to have an article which is a CONTENT FORK of the original Golden Globe awards article. The sole difference is that this article is based on all the black nominees and I find that highly trivial and unnecessary. All the black nominees are listed in their awards' appropriate article. There is no need to single them out here. Feed back ☎ 20:03, 21 February 2011 (UTC) Feed back ☎ 20:03, 21 February 2011 (UTC) reply