The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was speedy keep. Applying
WP:SKCRIT criterion one and three. There's no policy-based argument advanced here. (
non-admin closure)
clpo13(
talk) 00:26, 30 November 2015 (UTC)reply
Strong Keep. Notable as a billionaire, employer of 74,000 people, etc.
Zigzig20s (
talk) 16:07, 28 November 2015 (UTC)reply
Speedy Keep No valid reason given for deletion. And why are some editors so seemingly reluctant to familiarise themselves with
WP:BEFORE?
Edwardx (
talk) 16:13, 28 November 2015 (UTC)reply
Keep BEFORE applies here. (I see he has articles in two other Wikis as well)
Philafrenzy (
talk) 16:39, 28 November 2015 (UTC)reply
Keep - easily meets
WP:GNG. I can't even begin to comprehend what has lead
User:Musa Raza to make such a nomination.
Nfitz (
talk) 16:49, 29 November 2015 (UTC)reply
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was speedy keep. Applying
WP:SKCRIT criterion one and three. There's no policy-based argument advanced here. (
non-admin closure)
clpo13(
talk) 00:26, 30 November 2015 (UTC)reply
Strong Keep. Notable as a billionaire, employer of 74,000 people, etc.
Zigzig20s (
talk) 16:07, 28 November 2015 (UTC)reply
Speedy Keep No valid reason given for deletion. And why are some editors so seemingly reluctant to familiarise themselves with
WP:BEFORE?
Edwardx (
talk) 16:13, 28 November 2015 (UTC)reply
Keep BEFORE applies here. (I see he has articles in two other Wikis as well)
Philafrenzy (
talk) 16:39, 28 November 2015 (UTC)reply
Keep - easily meets
WP:GNG. I can't even begin to comprehend what has lead
User:Musa Raza to make such a nomination.
Nfitz (
talk) 16:49, 29 November 2015 (UTC)reply
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.