The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
No indication of why the subject is notable. Only one citation is in the article, and it gives no explanation for what makes Brown unique or noteworthy.
Nightscream (
talk) 15:19, 1 August 2022 (UTC)reply
DeleteWP:NGRIDIRON requires"multiple published non-trivial" sources. The article does not have this.
Nightscream (
talk) 20:21, 1 August 2022 (UTC)reply
You can't vote when you're the nominator.
BeanieFan11 (
talk) 21:40, 1 August 2022 (UTC)reply
Keep based on
[1][2][3]. Worth noting that although NGRIDIRON does not exist any more as a separate guideline, NFL players with as much experience as Simon are virtually always notable.
Hatman31 (
talk) 21:28, 1 August 2022 (UTC)reply
Keep. These nominations are getting ridiculous. Simon played EIGHTY-TWO games in the NFL and was a starter for multiple seasons. And, like 99% of other NFL players, Simon easily meets GNG, see
here,
here,
here,
here, and
here. They even made
football cards of him!
BeanieFan11 (
talk) 21:39, 1 August 2022 (UTC)reply
Keep: Played 80 NFL games. Undoubtedly notable due to having played several seasons in the NFL. Poor nomination rationale and should have sought better sources, not deletion.
Etzedek24(
I'll talk at ya) (
Check my track record) 22:08, 1 August 2022 (UTC)reply
Speedy keep per the above. The fact that the nominator couldn't even get th name right is one of many indications that
WP:BEFORE was not followed. If we all weren't so distracted with nominations like this we might actually be able to improve the encyclopedia.
StAnselm (
talk) 22:20, 1 August 2022 (UTC)reply
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
No indication of why the subject is notable. Only one citation is in the article, and it gives no explanation for what makes Brown unique or noteworthy.
Nightscream (
talk) 15:19, 1 August 2022 (UTC)reply
DeleteWP:NGRIDIRON requires"multiple published non-trivial" sources. The article does not have this.
Nightscream (
talk) 20:21, 1 August 2022 (UTC)reply
You can't vote when you're the nominator.
BeanieFan11 (
talk) 21:40, 1 August 2022 (UTC)reply
Keep based on
[1][2][3]. Worth noting that although NGRIDIRON does not exist any more as a separate guideline, NFL players with as much experience as Simon are virtually always notable.
Hatman31 (
talk) 21:28, 1 August 2022 (UTC)reply
Keep. These nominations are getting ridiculous. Simon played EIGHTY-TWO games in the NFL and was a starter for multiple seasons. And, like 99% of other NFL players, Simon easily meets GNG, see
here,
here,
here,
here, and
here. They even made
football cards of him!
BeanieFan11 (
talk) 21:39, 1 August 2022 (UTC)reply
Keep: Played 80 NFL games. Undoubtedly notable due to having played several seasons in the NFL. Poor nomination rationale and should have sought better sources, not deletion.
Etzedek24(
I'll talk at ya) (
Check my track record) 22:08, 1 August 2022 (UTC)reply
Speedy keep per the above. The fact that the nominator couldn't even get th name right is one of many indications that
WP:BEFORE was not followed. If we all weren't so distracted with nominations like this we might actually be able to improve the encyclopedia.
StAnselm (
talk) 22:20, 1 August 2022 (UTC)reply
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.