The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
Appears non-notable, with sourcing consisting of trivial mentions of the subject. Could perhaps redirect to the 313 Presidents article.
Oaktree b (
talk) 15:05, 9 June 2023 (UTC)reply
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus. Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
✗plicit 23:05, 16 June 2023 (UTC)reply
Redirect to 313 Presents by @
Oaktree b is a good option, but does not account for marketing experience & campaigns created for NFL, Virgin Mobile, SNL, MTV or the MLS. Sources have been updated in effort to meet suggestions. Some deleted portions of original contained citations in NYT, Forbes & other page links. Keep as example of marketing/advertising executive history.
S2Squared (
talk) 19:07, 22 June 2023 (UTC)reply
Delete It doesn't seem like there's enough sources to demonstrate individual notability. Sure there's a lot that could be said about his "marketing experience" but that's not a good enough reason to keep a Wikipedia page.
BuySomeApples (
talk) 21:35, 23 June 2023 (UTC)reply
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus. Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
✗plicit 23:36, 23 June 2023 (UTC)reply
Delete Does not seem to meet GNG though I'd be willing to take a deeper look at
WP:THREE . No good redirect target, though I'm not opposed to nom's idea. A big problem for me is the voice, it reads like publicity/promotion. If this person happens to meet GNG, we'd still need a full stubification/rewrite of this article. —
siroχo 23:42, 23 June 2023 (UTC)reply
Redirect per nom to
313 Presents, which already mentions him. (I express no opinion on the merits of that article.) No reason to merge IMO. Fairly classic case of an article assembled almost entirely from incidental mentions, which is especially problematic given the BLP and promotional issues here. --
Visviva (
talk) 00:20, 25 June 2023 (UTC)reply
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
Appears non-notable, with sourcing consisting of trivial mentions of the subject. Could perhaps redirect to the 313 Presidents article.
Oaktree b (
talk) 15:05, 9 June 2023 (UTC)reply
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus. Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
✗plicit 23:05, 16 June 2023 (UTC)reply
Redirect to 313 Presents by @
Oaktree b is a good option, but does not account for marketing experience & campaigns created for NFL, Virgin Mobile, SNL, MTV or the MLS. Sources have been updated in effort to meet suggestions. Some deleted portions of original contained citations in NYT, Forbes & other page links. Keep as example of marketing/advertising executive history.
S2Squared (
talk) 19:07, 22 June 2023 (UTC)reply
Delete It doesn't seem like there's enough sources to demonstrate individual notability. Sure there's a lot that could be said about his "marketing experience" but that's not a good enough reason to keep a Wikipedia page.
BuySomeApples (
talk) 21:35, 23 June 2023 (UTC)reply
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus. Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
✗plicit 23:36, 23 June 2023 (UTC)reply
Delete Does not seem to meet GNG though I'd be willing to take a deeper look at
WP:THREE . No good redirect target, though I'm not opposed to nom's idea. A big problem for me is the voice, it reads like publicity/promotion. If this person happens to meet GNG, we'd still need a full stubification/rewrite of this article. —
siroχo 23:42, 23 June 2023 (UTC)reply
Redirect per nom to
313 Presents, which already mentions him. (I express no opinion on the merits of that article.) No reason to merge IMO. Fairly classic case of an article assembled almost entirely from incidental mentions, which is especially problematic given the BLP and promotional issues here. --
Visviva (
talk) 00:20, 25 June 2023 (UTC)reply
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.