The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was merge to
Halo (franchise)#Plot. This section of this article already looks lengthy but if this is the target article/section, you prefer, so be it. LizRead!Talk! 02:44, 11 April 2024 (UTC)reply
I don't believe this is notable as a group. It is largely Halo's gameplay not its universe; so merging it to
Halo (franchise) seems to be more appropriate.
GreenishPickle! (
🔔) 04:55, 31 March 2024 (UTC)reply
Merge Per nom. The article fails to make a good argument for how the factions have been discussed as a group. The Covenant and Flood are notable, but they already have their own articles. The rest can be summarized on the series page fairly easily if the extraneous material is removed.
ᴢxᴄᴠʙɴᴍ (
ᴛ) 10:42, 31 March 2024 (UTC)reply
Comment. Polygon spends the better first half of this article discussing the factions
[1], and there's
[2] and
[3] if you like Valnet, but there's less out there than I would have guessed. The thing stopping me from !voting merge is that the suggested target article is already 6,600 words, and merging even a portion of this 4,300 word article is well into
WP:SIZESPLIT territory. ~
A412talk! 16:24, 31 March 2024 (UTC)reply
That article is substantially worse, at 13,000 words. Definitely not. ~
A412talk! 00:39, 2 April 2024 (UTC)reply
The article is large but a lot of the development section may be redundant. It's not even specifically about the factions.
ᴢxᴄᴠʙɴᴍ (
ᴛ) 23:53, 31 March 2024 (UTC)reply
I think I agree with a merge to various targets after going through the sections:
Merge per ᴢxᴄᴠʙɴᴍ. Neutral on the target. There are already articles on the only two notable factions, and there isn't
WP:SIGCOV for the factions outside of that.
Shooterwalker (
talk) 15:14, 5 April 2024 (UTC)reply
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus. Relisting comment: Relisting. There is a consensus to Merge but disagreement on what the target article(s) should be. Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, LizRead!Talk! 05:28, 7 April 2024 (UTC)reply
Merge The article does have notable sources, but does not seem to require an article. A merge should be apt.
MKsLifeInANutshell (
talk) 05:41, 7 April 2024 (UTC)reply
For me the main target should be
Halo (franchise)#Plot, though as detailed by A412, it can have different targets depending on the content.
ᴢxᴄᴠʙɴᴍ (
ᴛ) 08:50, 7 April 2024 (UTC)reply
Zxcvbnm is right. The redirect target can be the main series article. And some of it can be summarized at other articles if needed.
Shooterwalker (
talk) 19:22, 7 April 2024 (UTC)reply
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was merge to
Halo (franchise)#Plot. This section of this article already looks lengthy but if this is the target article/section, you prefer, so be it. LizRead!Talk! 02:44, 11 April 2024 (UTC)reply
I don't believe this is notable as a group. It is largely Halo's gameplay not its universe; so merging it to
Halo (franchise) seems to be more appropriate.
GreenishPickle! (
🔔) 04:55, 31 March 2024 (UTC)reply
Merge Per nom. The article fails to make a good argument for how the factions have been discussed as a group. The Covenant and Flood are notable, but they already have their own articles. The rest can be summarized on the series page fairly easily if the extraneous material is removed.
ᴢxᴄᴠʙɴᴍ (
ᴛ) 10:42, 31 March 2024 (UTC)reply
Comment. Polygon spends the better first half of this article discussing the factions
[1], and there's
[2] and
[3] if you like Valnet, but there's less out there than I would have guessed. The thing stopping me from !voting merge is that the suggested target article is already 6,600 words, and merging even a portion of this 4,300 word article is well into
WP:SIZESPLIT territory. ~
A412talk! 16:24, 31 March 2024 (UTC)reply
That article is substantially worse, at 13,000 words. Definitely not. ~
A412talk! 00:39, 2 April 2024 (UTC)reply
The article is large but a lot of the development section may be redundant. It's not even specifically about the factions.
ᴢxᴄᴠʙɴᴍ (
ᴛ) 23:53, 31 March 2024 (UTC)reply
I think I agree with a merge to various targets after going through the sections:
Merge per ᴢxᴄᴠʙɴᴍ. Neutral on the target. There are already articles on the only two notable factions, and there isn't
WP:SIGCOV for the factions outside of that.
Shooterwalker (
talk) 15:14, 5 April 2024 (UTC)reply
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus. Relisting comment: Relisting. There is a consensus to Merge but disagreement on what the target article(s) should be. Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, LizRead!Talk! 05:28, 7 April 2024 (UTC)reply
Merge The article does have notable sources, but does not seem to require an article. A merge should be apt.
MKsLifeInANutshell (
talk) 05:41, 7 April 2024 (UTC)reply
For me the main target should be
Halo (franchise)#Plot, though as detailed by A412, it can have different targets depending on the content.
ᴢxᴄᴠʙɴᴍ (
ᴛ) 08:50, 7 April 2024 (UTC)reply
Zxcvbnm is right. The redirect target can be the main series article. And some of it can be summarized at other articles if needed.
Shooterwalker (
talk) 19:22, 7 April 2024 (UTC)reply
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.