The result was soft delete. Based on minimal participation, this uncontroversial nomination is treated as an expired PROD (a.k.a. "soft deletion"). Editors can request the article's undeletion. ✗ plicit 23:57, 8 February 2024 (UTC)
[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!
Does not meet WP:GNG. As written the article cites some significant coverage in Rugbymeet ( [1], [2]), a publication that does not list any editorial policies and whose reliability is unclear. Outside that publication, I'm unable to find any independent coverage of the subject. signed, Rosguill talk 19:12, 1 February 2024 (UTC)
The result was soft delete. Based on minimal participation, this uncontroversial nomination is treated as an expired PROD (a.k.a. "soft deletion"). Editors can request the article's undeletion. ✗ plicit 23:57, 8 February 2024 (UTC)
[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!
Does not meet WP:GNG. As written the article cites some significant coverage in Rugbymeet ( [1], [2]), a publication that does not list any editorial policies and whose reliability is unclear. Outside that publication, I'm unable to find any independent coverage of the subject. signed, Rosguill talk 19:12, 1 February 2024 (UTC)