- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. Consensus is to delete here. Also noting that previous AfD, from 2005, also resulted in delete outcome. Barkeep49 ( talk) 04:04, 20 February 2020 (UTC)
Bucketworks
AfDs for this article:
[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!
- Bucketworks ( | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – ( View log · Stats)
- (Find sources: Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Program of arguably non-notable org, The School Factory (just PROD-deleted). No indication passes WP:GNG. Loksmythe ( talk) 16:25, 5 February 2020 (UTC) Loksmythe ( talk) 16:25, 5 February 2020 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Organizations-related deletion discussions. Shellwood ( talk) 16:28, 5 February 2020 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Wisconsin-related deletion discussions. Shellwood ( talk) 16:28, 5 February 2020 (UTC)
- Weak Delete: The services provided by this organization are described on pg 285-286 here, page 62 here. Both sources discuss the organization as a model for other organizations like it, but fail to reach more depth than a list of services provided. The idea that this organization is treated as a model for others is why I hedge my vote as weak. I still go with delete, because there's no discussion in the sources discussing how it is a model, and its services are similar to those provided by community organizations I've encountered in other towns. Local news media mentions the place as a venue and public space, but nothing more. It also receives several other mentions in Google Books results. There may very well be other text sources out there that discuss the organization in more depth, but I have no way to tell. Skeletor3000 ( talk) 00:23, 6 February 2020 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Sandstein 19:32, 12 February 2020 (UTC)
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Sandstein 19:32, 12 February 2020 (UTC)
- Delete. Screenshots of their website do not do much for GNG. Dorama285 00:29, 19 February 2020 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. Consensus is to delete here. Also noting that previous AfD, from 2005, also resulted in delete outcome. Barkeep49 ( talk) 04:04, 20 February 2020 (UTC)
Bucketworks
AfDs for this article:
[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!
- Bucketworks ( | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – ( View log · Stats)
- (Find sources: Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Program of arguably non-notable org, The School Factory (just PROD-deleted). No indication passes WP:GNG. Loksmythe ( talk) 16:25, 5 February 2020 (UTC) Loksmythe ( talk) 16:25, 5 February 2020 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Organizations-related deletion discussions. Shellwood ( talk) 16:28, 5 February 2020 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Wisconsin-related deletion discussions. Shellwood ( talk) 16:28, 5 February 2020 (UTC)
- Weak Delete: The services provided by this organization are described on pg 285-286 here, page 62 here. Both sources discuss the organization as a model for other organizations like it, but fail to reach more depth than a list of services provided. The idea that this organization is treated as a model for others is why I hedge my vote as weak. I still go with delete, because there's no discussion in the sources discussing how it is a model, and its services are similar to those provided by community organizations I've encountered in other towns. Local news media mentions the place as a venue and public space, but nothing more. It also receives several other mentions in Google Books results. There may very well be other text sources out there that discuss the organization in more depth, but I have no way to tell. Skeletor3000 ( talk) 00:23, 6 February 2020 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Sandstein 19:32, 12 February 2020 (UTC)
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Sandstein 19:32, 12 February 2020 (UTC)
- Delete. Screenshots of their website do not do much for GNG. Dorama285 00:29, 19 February 2020 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.