The result was delete. Sockpuppet votes have properly been stricken. BD2412 T 21:39, 25 March 2020 (UTC)
[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!
No indication of independent notability / in-depth coverage, should be redirected to artist. Elmidae ( talk · contribs) 21:05, 17 March 2020 (UTC)
*Keep: I created this article one day after reading it under the "news' section on the
Billboard website. The problem with the nominators interpretation of
WP:SIGCOV is that the subject isn't a mere trivial mention but more of an edict by Billboard themselves. The additional cites are actual credits from music aggregates. Furthermore, the nominators choice to delete seems more emotional motivated than the commentators. Secondly and tertiary if articles from music industry leading publications such as Billboard and Rolling Stone aren't enough to establish standards for "verifiability and notability", listed in
WP:NALBUM then I truly don't know what is. For at a very minimum the article does "document that the criterion is true".
Krealkayln (
talk) 22:22, 18 March 2020 (UTC) crossing out sockpuppet account.
xinbenlv
Talk,
Remember to "ping" me 19:15, 25 March 2020 (UTC)
*Keep: Interesting takes on both sides. In terms of
Richard3120 last response he says “wouldn’t [really] be a good cite” which comes across as ambiguous in theory. Although anecdotal, I’m pretty sure it would be an acceptable cite for that wiki article. Just my two cents. I vote keep.
osatmusic (
talk) 22:58, 19 March 2020 (UTC) —
osatmusic (
talk •
contribs) has made
few or no other edits outside this topic. obvious sock struck out --
Elmidae (
talk ·
contribs) 00:01, 20 March 2020 (UTC)
label...
The result was delete. Sockpuppet votes have properly been stricken. BD2412 T 21:39, 25 March 2020 (UTC)
[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!
No indication of independent notability / in-depth coverage, should be redirected to artist. Elmidae ( talk · contribs) 21:05, 17 March 2020 (UTC)
*Keep: I created this article one day after reading it under the "news' section on the
Billboard website. The problem with the nominators interpretation of
WP:SIGCOV is that the subject isn't a mere trivial mention but more of an edict by Billboard themselves. The additional cites are actual credits from music aggregates. Furthermore, the nominators choice to delete seems more emotional motivated than the commentators. Secondly and tertiary if articles from music industry leading publications such as Billboard and Rolling Stone aren't enough to establish standards for "verifiability and notability", listed in
WP:NALBUM then I truly don't know what is. For at a very minimum the article does "document that the criterion is true".
Krealkayln (
talk) 22:22, 18 March 2020 (UTC) crossing out sockpuppet account.
xinbenlv
Talk,
Remember to "ping" me 19:15, 25 March 2020 (UTC)
*Keep: Interesting takes on both sides. In terms of
Richard3120 last response he says “wouldn’t [really] be a good cite” which comes across as ambiguous in theory. Although anecdotal, I’m pretty sure it would be an acceptable cite for that wiki article. Just my two cents. I vote keep.
osatmusic (
talk) 22:58, 19 March 2020 (UTC) —
osatmusic (
talk •
contribs) has made
few or no other edits outside this topic. obvious sock struck out --
Elmidae (
talk ·
contribs) 00:01, 20 March 2020 (UTC)
label...