This is a closed arbitration case. Except for arbitrators or clerks editing in their official capacity, you must not edit this page. Edits can be reverted without discussion.
- If an editor has violated this decision, you can request enforcement at Wikipedia:Arbitration/Requests/Enforcement.
- If parts of this decision require amending or clarifying, create a request at Wikipedia:Arbitration/Requests/Clarification and Amendment.
- To raise general questions, see Wikipedia talk:Arbitration Committee.
- If you are an administrator who has enforced this decision, logging is now done at the centralised arbitration enforcement log.
Case clerk: Username ( Talk) Drafting arbitrators: Sandbox ( Talk) & Παράδειγμα ( Talk)
| Wikipedia Arbitration |
|---|
 |
|
|
| Track related changes |
Case opened on 00:15, 27 November 2018 (UTC)
Case closed on 10:56, 16 December 2018 (UTC)
Involved parties
- $1 ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA), filing party
- Example ( talk · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log)
- Example male ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA)
- Example public ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA)
- Example female ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA)
Prior dispute resolution
Clerk notes
- This area is used for notes by the clerks (including clerk recusals).
- Duis aute irure dolor in reprehenderit in voluptate velit esse cillum dolore eu fugiat nulla pariatur. Username ( talk) 05:12, 26 November 2018 (UTC)
Arbitrators' opinions on hearing this matter (4/0/0)
Vote key: (Accept/decline/recuse)
- Accept. Arbitrator1 12:00, 24 November 2018 (UTC)
- Accept. Arbitrator2 15:00, 24 November 2018 (UTC)
- Accept. Arbitrator3 18:00, 24 November 2018 (UTC)
- Accept. Arbitrator4 08:00, 25 November 2018 (UTC)
Final decision Information
Enforcement of restrictions
0) Should any user subject to a restriction in this case violate that restriction, that user may be blocked, initially for up to one month, and then with blocks increasing in duration to a maximum of one year.
- In accordance with the procedure for the standard enforcement provision adopted 3 May 2014, this provision did not require a vote.
Appeals and modifications
0) Appeals and modifications
|
|---|
|
This procedure applies to appeals related to, and modifications of, actions taken by administrators to enforce the Committee's remedies. It does not apply to appeals related to the remedies directly enacted by the Committee.
Appeals may be made only by the editor under sanction and only for a currently active sanction. Requests for modification of page restrictions may be made by any editor. The process has three possible stages (see "Important notes" below). The editor may:
No administrator may modify or remove a sanction placed by another administrator without:
Administrators modifying sanctions out of process may at the discretion of the committee be desysopped. Nothing in this section prevents an administrator from replacing an existing sanction issued by another administrator with a new sanction if fresh misconduct has taken place after the existing sanction was applied. Administrators are free to modify sanctions placed by former administrators – that is, editors who do not have the administrator permission enabled (due to a temporary or permanent relinquishment or desysop) – without regard to the requirements of this section. If an administrator modifies a sanction placed by a former administrator, the administrator who made the modification becomes the "enforcing administrator". If a former administrator regains the tools, the provisions of this section again apply to their unmodified enforcement actions. Important notes:
|
- In accordance with the procedure for the standard appeals and modifications provision adopted 3 May 2014, this provision did not require a vote.
Any block, restriction, ban, or sanction performed under the authorisation of a remedy for this case must be logged at Wikipedia:Arbitration enforcement log, not here.
This is a closed arbitration case. Except for arbitrators or clerks editing in their official capacity, you must not edit this page. Edits can be reverted without discussion.
- If an editor has violated this decision, you can request enforcement at Wikipedia:Arbitration/Requests/Enforcement.
- If parts of this decision require amending or clarifying, create a request at Wikipedia:Arbitration/Requests/Clarification and Amendment.
- To raise general questions, see Wikipedia talk:Arbitration Committee.
- If you are an administrator who has enforced this decision, logging is now done at the centralised arbitration enforcement log.
Case clerk: Username ( Talk) Drafting arbitrators: Sandbox ( Talk) & Παράδειγμα ( Talk)
| Wikipedia Arbitration |
|---|
|
|
|
|
| Track related changes |
Case opened on 00:15, 27 November 2018 (UTC)
Case closed on 10:56, 16 December 2018 (UTC)
Involved parties
- $1 ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA), filing party
- Example ( talk · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log)
- Example male ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA)
- Example public ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA)
- Example female ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA)
Prior dispute resolution
Clerk notes
- This area is used for notes by the clerks (including clerk recusals).
- Duis aute irure dolor in reprehenderit in voluptate velit esse cillum dolore eu fugiat nulla pariatur. Username ( talk) 05:12, 26 November 2018 (UTC)
Arbitrators' opinions on hearing this matter (4/0/0)
Vote key: (Accept/decline/recuse)
- Accept. Arbitrator1 12:00, 24 November 2018 (UTC)
- Accept. Arbitrator2 15:00, 24 November 2018 (UTC)
- Accept. Arbitrator3 18:00, 24 November 2018 (UTC)
- Accept. Arbitrator4 08:00, 25 November 2018 (UTC)
Final decision Information
Enforcement of restrictions
0) Should any user subject to a restriction in this case violate that restriction, that user may be blocked, initially for up to one month, and then with blocks increasing in duration to a maximum of one year.
- In accordance with the procedure for the standard enforcement provision adopted 3 May 2014, this provision did not require a vote.
Appeals and modifications
0) Appeals and modifications
|
|---|
|
This procedure applies to appeals related to, and modifications of, actions taken by administrators to enforce the Committee's remedies. It does not apply to appeals related to the remedies directly enacted by the Committee.
Appeals may be made only by the editor under sanction and only for a currently active sanction. Requests for modification of page restrictions may be made by any editor. The process has three possible stages (see "Important notes" below). The editor may:
No administrator may modify or remove a sanction placed by another administrator without:
Administrators modifying sanctions out of process may at the discretion of the committee be desysopped. Nothing in this section prevents an administrator from replacing an existing sanction issued by another administrator with a new sanction if fresh misconduct has taken place after the existing sanction was applied. Administrators are free to modify sanctions placed by former administrators – that is, editors who do not have the administrator permission enabled (due to a temporary or permanent relinquishment or desysop) – without regard to the requirements of this section. If an administrator modifies a sanction placed by a former administrator, the administrator who made the modification becomes the "enforcing administrator". If a former administrator regains the tools, the provisions of this section again apply to their unmodified enforcement actions. Important notes:
|
- In accordance with the procedure for the standard appeals and modifications provision adopted 3 May 2014, this provision did not require a vote.
Any block, restriction, ban, or sanction performed under the authorisation of a remedy for this case must be logged at Wikipedia:Arbitration enforcement log, not here.