This is a
WikiProject, an area for focused collaboration among Wikipedians. New participants are welcome; please feel free to participate!
|
Shortcuts | WP:BRIDGE, WP:TUNNEL |
---|---|
Category | WikiProject Bridges and Tunnels |
Portals |
Transport Architecture |
Wikimedia Commons | Bridges |
Parent project(s) | Architecture, Civil engineering, Transport |
Project banner template | {{
WikiProject Bridges and Tunnels|class=|importance=}} |
Userbox | {{ User bridges}} |
Has goals? | Yes |
Assessment | Wikipedia:WikiProject Bridges and Tunnels/Assessment |
Popular pages | Wikipedia:WikiProject Bridges and Tunnels/Popular pages |
Welcome to WikiProject Bridges and Tunnels.
If you would like to help, check the to do list or articles needing attention. Feel free to include yourself to the list of participants.
Template for members to include on their user page: {{ WikiProject Bridges and Tunnels}}; or Use the following on your userbox form to show you are part of this project:
Code | Result | ||
---|---|---|---|
{{ User bridges}} |
|
The template to place on an article's talk page (pretty basic) is {{ WikiProject Bridges and Tunnels}}.
Class and importance guidelines are shown on the Assessment page.
The basic Wiki guidelines should be followed normally. The San Francisco-Oakland Bay Bridge and Pulaski Skyway serve as good models.
The introduction sentence should include what type of bridge or tunnel it is, what it crosses (river, canyon, etc.), and where it is located:
Please upload media to Wikimedia Commons so that it can be used across all Wikipedia projects easily. If there are many pictures a gallery at the bottom of the page is an option to consider.
The article should be included in the category for the type of bridge that it is (example Category:Suspension bridges). It should also contain a category based on location, such as Category:Bridges in New York (state)
There has been much discussion at Wikipedia talk:Categorization and on this talk page about the best way to organize articles within categories. For this project we will place all bridge articles in a category based on location (by nation for countries not yet with a lot of bridge articles where subdivision hasn't happened ( Category:Bridges in Japan), or small countries with relatively few bridges ( Category:Bridges in Singapore)), or states/provinces for larger countries ( Category:Bridges in New York (state)). If these categories are further divided amongst subcategories, the articles will remain included within the larger category (For example: all the bridges in Category:Toll bridges in New York (state) and Category:Bridges in New York City will be included in Category:Bridges in New York (state)). This makes the category pages the easiest to navigate at the price of adding slightly redundant categories on the individual articles. This has been found to be the best solution until MetaWiki supports the inclusion of subcategory articles within parent category pages.
A good article should contain as much of the following, and more, as possible:
The more you can put into an article, the more references (more references mean more people care), the more data in general, the less susceptible to AfD the article is.
See the list of Historic Civil Engineering Landmarks at the ASCE Civil Engineering historic landmark list (also at List of historic civil engineering landmarks); the bridges below don't have articles yet, unless they're here under another name:
Since these bridges are listed as Historic Civil Engineering Landmarks, they're probably noteworthy enough to deserve articles.
Bridges that were landmarks in their time but are now gone, but which heartily deserve articles.
Bridge and Tunnel articles by quality and importance | |||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Quality | Importance | ||||||
Top | High | Mid | Low | NA | ??? | Total | |
FA | 2 | 10 | 15 | 27 | |||
FL | 2 | 2 | |||||
GA | 1 | 7 | 27 | 56 | 91 | ||
B | 9 | 22 | 59 | 138 | 4 | 232 | |
C | 9 | 27 | 116 | 545 | 31 | 728 | |
Start | 7 | 63 | 323 | 2,648 | 72 | 3,113 | |
Stub | 1 | 25 | 169 | 3,047 | 86 | 3,328 | |
List | 4 | 29 | 56 | 330 | 1 | 4 | 424 |
Category | 2 | 2,497 | 2,499 | ||||
Disambig | 1 | 129 | 130 | ||||
File | 44 | 44 | |||||
Project | 7 | 7 | |||||
Template | 236 | 236 | |||||
NA | 2 | 4 | 60 | 177 | 243 | ||
Other | 6 | 6 | |||||
Assessed | 31 | 177 | 766 | 6,842 | 3,097 | 197 | 11,110 |
Unassessed | 2 | 2 | 148 | 152 | |||
Total | 31 | 177 | 766 | 6,844 | 3,099 | 345 | 11,262 |
WikiWork factors ( ?) | ω = 39,317 | Ω = 5.23 |
This is a
WikiProject, an area for focused collaboration among Wikipedians. New participants are welcome; please feel free to participate!
|
Shortcuts | WP:BRIDGE, WP:TUNNEL |
---|---|
Category | WikiProject Bridges and Tunnels |
Portals |
Transport Architecture |
Wikimedia Commons | Bridges |
Parent project(s) | Architecture, Civil engineering, Transport |
Project banner template | {{
WikiProject Bridges and Tunnels|class=|importance=}} |
Userbox | {{ User bridges}} |
Has goals? | Yes |
Assessment | Wikipedia:WikiProject Bridges and Tunnels/Assessment |
Popular pages | Wikipedia:WikiProject Bridges and Tunnels/Popular pages |
Welcome to WikiProject Bridges and Tunnels.
If you would like to help, check the to do list or articles needing attention. Feel free to include yourself to the list of participants.
Template for members to include on their user page: {{ WikiProject Bridges and Tunnels}}; or Use the following on your userbox form to show you are part of this project:
Code | Result | ||
---|---|---|---|
{{ User bridges}} |
|
The template to place on an article's talk page (pretty basic) is {{ WikiProject Bridges and Tunnels}}.
Class and importance guidelines are shown on the Assessment page.
The basic Wiki guidelines should be followed normally. The San Francisco-Oakland Bay Bridge and Pulaski Skyway serve as good models.
The introduction sentence should include what type of bridge or tunnel it is, what it crosses (river, canyon, etc.), and where it is located:
Please upload media to Wikimedia Commons so that it can be used across all Wikipedia projects easily. If there are many pictures a gallery at the bottom of the page is an option to consider.
The article should be included in the category for the type of bridge that it is (example Category:Suspension bridges). It should also contain a category based on location, such as Category:Bridges in New York (state)
There has been much discussion at Wikipedia talk:Categorization and on this talk page about the best way to organize articles within categories. For this project we will place all bridge articles in a category based on location (by nation for countries not yet with a lot of bridge articles where subdivision hasn't happened ( Category:Bridges in Japan), or small countries with relatively few bridges ( Category:Bridges in Singapore)), or states/provinces for larger countries ( Category:Bridges in New York (state)). If these categories are further divided amongst subcategories, the articles will remain included within the larger category (For example: all the bridges in Category:Toll bridges in New York (state) and Category:Bridges in New York City will be included in Category:Bridges in New York (state)). This makes the category pages the easiest to navigate at the price of adding slightly redundant categories on the individual articles. This has been found to be the best solution until MetaWiki supports the inclusion of subcategory articles within parent category pages.
A good article should contain as much of the following, and more, as possible:
The more you can put into an article, the more references (more references mean more people care), the more data in general, the less susceptible to AfD the article is.
See the list of Historic Civil Engineering Landmarks at the ASCE Civil Engineering historic landmark list (also at List of historic civil engineering landmarks); the bridges below don't have articles yet, unless they're here under another name:
Since these bridges are listed as Historic Civil Engineering Landmarks, they're probably noteworthy enough to deserve articles.
Bridges that were landmarks in their time but are now gone, but which heartily deserve articles.
Bridge and Tunnel articles by quality and importance | |||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Quality | Importance | ||||||
Top | High | Mid | Low | NA | ??? | Total | |
FA | 2 | 10 | 15 | 27 | |||
FL | 2 | 2 | |||||
GA | 1 | 7 | 27 | 56 | 91 | ||
B | 9 | 22 | 59 | 138 | 4 | 232 | |
C | 9 | 27 | 116 | 545 | 31 | 728 | |
Start | 7 | 63 | 323 | 2,648 | 72 | 3,113 | |
Stub | 1 | 25 | 169 | 3,047 | 86 | 3,328 | |
List | 4 | 29 | 56 | 330 | 1 | 4 | 424 |
Category | 2 | 2,497 | 2,499 | ||||
Disambig | 1 | 129 | 130 | ||||
File | 44 | 44 | |||||
Project | 7 | 7 | |||||
Template | 236 | 236 | |||||
NA | 2 | 4 | 60 | 177 | 243 | ||
Other | 6 | 6 | |||||
Assessed | 31 | 177 | 766 | 6,842 | 3,097 | 197 | 11,110 |
Unassessed | 2 | 2 | 148 | 152 | |||
Total | 31 | 177 | 766 | 6,844 | 3,099 | 345 | 11,262 |
WikiWork factors ( ?) | ω = 39,317 | Ω = 5.23 |