This page is an archive. Do not edit the contents of this page. Please direct any additional comments to the current main page. |
Please check how many articles qualify for a stub type before proposing it.
If (after approval) you create a stub type, please be sure to add it to the list of stub types. This page will be archived in its entirety once all discussions have been closed; there is no need to move them to another page.
The result of the debate was create.
Propose splitting out the following
Waacstats ( talk) 10:53, 31 March 2009 (UTC)
SUpport as with other major professions templates. Dr. Blofeld White cat 15:01, 2 April 2009 (UTC)
The result of the debate was create.
upmerged templates and two categories should push over 60.
Waacstats (
talk) 20:15, 29 March 2009 (UTC)
The result of the debate was create upmerged Czechoslovakia-stub, proceed with caution.
Former country stub.
CatScan found 67 articles.--
Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus|
talk 17:49, 29 March 2009 (UTC)
I actually think this would be a very much needed template. I would support it. Dr. Blofeld White cat 10:26, 30 March 2009 (UTC)
The result of the debate was create as AustriaHungary-stub.
Former country stub.
CatScan found 156 articles.--
Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus|
talk 17:49, 29 March 2009 (UTC)
The result of the debate was create upmerged template.
Somebody is using insect-stub too much. A potential 1800 articles.
Dr. Blofeld
White cat 17:21, 29 March 2009 (UTC)
The result of the debate was create as revised.
At present we only have {{
Economist-stub}} and American. 550 stubs, should create templates for most of the European countries and Russia and some Asian countries like India etc. It is likely several will be viable for new categories.
Dr. Blofeld
White cat 16:54, 29 March 2009 (UTC)
I was thinking something like the following:
The result of the debate was create Tees Valley school stubs.
Different stubs must be created for
Redcar & Cleveland schools,
Stockton and
Middlesbrough schools.
Technically, these schools aren't in Yorkshire and Humber but confusingly are in Yorkshire.
Perhaps categories should also be made for North Yorkshire schools etc. Computerjoe 's talk 16:01, 29 March 2009 (UTC)
The result of the debate was create.
Another template goes past the 60 mark, speedy category.
Waacstats (
talk) 12:18, 29 March 2009 (UTC)
Support
Dr. Blofeld
White cat 16:54, 29 March 2009 (UTC)
The result of the debate was create already! :P.
Category is approaching 500 and with a bit of attention, most to all of the templates should surpass 60. Propose categories for all over 60.--
TM 23:24, 28 March 2009 (UTC)
UPmerged template has >60 articles. Propose category. Speedy? Waacstats ( talk) 16:31, 27 March 2009 (UTC)
The result of the debate was create.
we have an upmerged template with 60 articles. Speedy?
Waacstats (
talk) 11:31, 27 March 2009 (UTC)
The result of the debate was create NagornoKarabakh-stub & cat; upmerged templates for -geo- and -bio- for now.
{{
Nagorno-Karabakh-stub}}
Articles: virtually all articles in Category:Nagorno-Karabakh. I have found these stubs that are not necessarily within the category. (there are many more, including some within the category)
That was thirty. A few more while I am on it, but I am running out of time:
-- 189.121.183.72 ( talk) 22:14, 24 March 2009 (UTC)
Continuing,
40
(I think listing more from Template:Lachin Rayon is a little cheap, so I will contine without it)
50
60
That was 65. There are hundreds of more geographic and biographical stubs that can be added to this list. Is this good enough?-- 189.121.183.72 ( talk) 20:13, 1 April 2009 (UTC)
The result of the debate was create.
I count over 80 stubs.
Dr. Blofeld
White cat 21:35, 24 March 2009 (UTC)
The result of the debate was create.
Propose {{
Russia-volleyball-bio-stub}} and
Category:Russian volleyball biography stubs. Catscan shows 69 articles.
Waacstats (
talk) 12:19, 24 March 2009 (UTC)
Yep you sports enthuasiast you
Dr. Blofeld
White cat 21:35, 24 March 2009 (UTC)
The result of the debate was create.
uperged template exicts with 60 articles propose cat (Speedy).
Waacstats (
talk) 12:16, 24 March 2009 (UTC)
The result of the debate was do not create; recommend project banner instead.
Parliamentary Procedure Project primary topic. At least 60 stubs sorted.
The result of the debate was create.
The following upmerged tempaltes all have 60+ articles propose speedy cats.
Waacstats ( talk) 13:40, 23 March 2009 (UTC)
Def. Dr. Blofeld White cat 21:34, 24 March 2009 (UTC)
The result of the debate was create.
Propose giving the following categories upmerged by nation templates
note I will come back to Europe/SouthAm/Africa/CentralAm. Waacstats ( talk) 08:50, 23 March 2009 (UTC) Definately Dr. Blofeld White cat 21:34, 24 March 2009 (UTC)
The result of the debate was create.
As with chile so with uruguay the sport-bio and athletics-bio combine for over 60 and we already have a footy cat.
Waacstats (
talk) 14:56, 22 March 2009 (UTC)
The result of the debate was create.
two upmerged templates (-sport- and -athletics-) total over 60 and 1 cat (footy).
Waacstats (
talk) 14:19, 22 March 2009 (UTC)
The result of the debate was create.
I know this has been proposed (and passed) a couple of times but I plan on doing templates for the missing countries (mainly Oceania and Carribean) anyone oppose this.
Waacstats (
talk) 15:11, 18 March 2009 (UTC)
Go for it. I know somebody did the SOlomons a while back. Dr. Blofeld White cat 18:36, 18 March 2009 (UTC)
The result of the debate was moved to sfd.
The result of the debate was create.
I propose the creation of both a
Synapsid stub type {{synapsid-stub}} and one for prehistoric
arthropods, {{paleo-arthropod-stub}}. Both would have more than enough to qualify for creation, but I'm not going to count them because their parent category (paleontology stubs) has over 800 articles in it.
Abyssal (
talk) 10:46, 17 March 2009 (UTC)
Support. Break down of anything over 800 is clearly needed Dr. Blofeld White cat 18:02, 17 March 2009 (UTC)
The result of the debate was create.
{{
Norway-tram-stub}} has surpassed 60 transclusions, and is increasing rapidly.
Arsenikk
(talk) 20:29, 15 March 2009 (UTC)
Support. Dr. Blofeld White cat 11:27, 17 March 2009 (UTC)
The result of the debate was create.
as with europe so with other continents. Propose split by nation templates for each country along the lines of {{
Foo-athletics-bio-stub}}/{{
Foo-sport-bio-stub}}. Templates for any template that gets to 60.
Waacstats (
talk) 19:45, 15 March 2009 (UTC)
Good idea Dr. Blofeld White cat 18:02, 17 March 2009 (UTC)
The result of the debate was create.
Category:Belgian athletics biography stubs will have 60 articles from currently upmerged template.
Category:Moldovan sportspeople stubs will have 50 aticles from currently upmerged templates and 1 subcat.
Propose for speedy.
Waacstats (
talk) 19:45, 15 March 2009 (UTC)
SHould be fine
Dr. Blofeld
White cat 18:02, 17 March 2009 (UTC)
The result of the debate was create.
Create templates for most of the main countries and upmerge until they hit 60, e.g {{
Germany-photographer-stub}}, {{
Spain-photographer-stub}}, {{
Lithuania-architect-stub}} etc.
Dr. Blofeld
White cat 12:46, 15 March 2009 (UTC)
The result of the debate was create.
Upmerged stubs add up to 68--
TM 20:45, 12 March 2009 (UTC)
Miles, we will come to that when we create the templates. Its best if you merge this with my proposal underneath. Speedy for now but we may want to create a few stubs to make a number of other countries viablle too Dr. Blofeld White cat 21:24, 12 March 2009 (UTC)
Oh sorry I was mixing you with T J miles! Dr. Blofeld White cat 12:44, 15 March 2009 (UTC)
The result of the debate was create.
Split of
Category:Asian sports venue stubs, which is above 550.--
TM 21:28, 11 March 2009 (UTC)
The result of the debate was create.
Way over 60!
Dr. Blofeld
White cat 18:36, 11 March 2009 (UTC)
The result of the debate was create.
Now over 85 stubs.
Dr. Blofeld
White cat 14:43, 10 March 2009 (UTC)
The result of the debate was create.
Category:Panamanian sportspeople stubs = 70 stubs. Speedy?--
TM 22:24, 9 March 2009 (UTC)
Speedy
Dr. Blofeld
White cat 10:49, 10 March 2009 (UTC)
The result of the debate was create.
Thought this had been proposed but can't find it, existing template with well over 60 stubs. Speedy?
Waacstats (
talk) 20:22, 6 March 2009 (UTC)
Go for it amigo. Dr. Blofeld White cat 20:15, 8 March 2009 (UTC)
The result of the debate was create as revised.
Propose creating struct templates for every country of Africa and upmerging by region of Africa perhaps?
Dr. Blofeld
White cat
I propose:
That I have, may even see about creating a few new articles too. Dr. Blofeld White cat 11:23, 6 March 2009 (UTC)
The result of the debate was do not create.
To go under
Category:NorthernIreland-stub.
There is currently no section for general Northern Ireland sporting organisations or more specifically for aeromodelling in the Northern Ireland section, so I propose an aeromodelling stub Sean Scully 12.55 5th March 2009 (GMT)
control flying: 11,983 indoor flying: 547 model helicopter flying: 921 rc model flying: 178 model jets 5578 model gliders: 729
Total: 19,936
Now if we apply your mathematics to this it means that with these searches alone we have
30% of 19936 = 6645 stubs, 10% of 6645 = 664 about British Aeromodelling, 15% of 664 = 99.6 stubs that have content relating to or can be linked to a stubb on Northern Ireland Aeromodelling.
If you do a search for model associations you get a return of 19,268 I take it that all of these are also opposed?
Under model flying associations there are 1412, again all of these other associations are now contested? Or is it just Northern Irelands model flying association? Regarding Naming convention the following are listed
Model Aeronautics Association of Canada; British Model Flying Association; Far East Model Car Association; Fourth Association of Model Auto Racing; American Speed Association;
What is the difference in these names and my proposal? That they are Canada, British American? These have all been accepted in the past and are not contested. Is it only large countries who should be listed in Wikipedia? Sean Scully 7th March 2009 23:55 GMT
Surely the very nature of Wikipedia is to allow access to ALL. Northern Ireland throughout a large part of the world is totally unknown apart from the new they see on TV. Aeromodelling is a large organisation in NI and should be allowed its place. bill scott Belfast N.I.
Aeromodelling encourages many educational, social and recreational benefits. Any one who wishes to get involved may use Wikipedia to garner information, particularly if they are interested in model flying in N. Ireland. Small countries should not be discriminated against in this way. Robert McCartney Londonderry N.I.
Wikipedia provides knowledge and a source of information for many people around the world, thats what the world web is all about. When we start saying NO! to various interest groups from small regions like Northern Ireland, such as the NIAA, the official voice of Areomodelling in the region, then I believe its defeats the overall purpose of the world web. John Pearson Armagh N.I.
Northern Ireland geography stubs; Northern Ireland politician stubs; Northern Ireland railway station stubs; Northern Ireland school stubs; Northern Ireland stubs; Northern Irish football biography stubs; Northern Irish football club stubs; Northern Irish people stubs; Northern Irish sportspeople stubs;
Aeromodelling does not fit any of these categories neatly.
We will however take your advice and simply create stubs in the Northern Ireland stubs, then when ample stubs relating to NIAA aeromodelling are created we will again request that a stub type for this be created separately. As such I withdraw at this point in time the request for a a new NIAA stub type. Sean Scully 8th March 2009 23:20 GMT
The result of the debate was create as tradition-stub.
To go under
Category:Folklore.
It is such a huge subject that i am surprised no stub exists for it. You see, {{
mythology-stub}} and {{
culture-stub}} don't quite hit the mark, and a {{
traditions-stub}} also does not exist...so i guess i'm proposing both, then! (the latter to go under
Category:Traditions) I ran into the need for the folklore stub when re-creating the
Baba Marta article, and the traditions stub when expanding
Pizho and Penda, but there are many articles that would benefit from them both. Thank You!
BigSteve (
talk) 23:33, 4 March 2009 (UTC)
Hi, folks, I've created the tradition stub: {{ tradition-stub}} I chose the piñata as the picture as it is a very well-known tradition, and vividly colourful for the tiny thumbnail image. please visit the wiki commons page for the picture as well as the stub page to check if i have done everything correctly (this is my first stub template so am still learning), especially if i have mentioned the correct licence and added all the relevant categories. (I have not yet created the folklore stub as i cannot think of what picture to use...) Thank you in advance! BigSteve ( talk) 13:34, 20 March 2009 (UTC)
ps. I've added the new stub here - correct or not? i am unsure about the parent category being Category:Traditions while the stub is "tradition" (singular) - and then should the stub category be Category:tradition stubs or Category:traditions stubs??? or both, with a redirect in between them? BigSteve ( talk) 14:18, 20 March 2009 (UTC)
The result of the debate was create.
To go under
Category:Astronomy stubs and
Category:Nebulae
This nebula-related article is a stub. You can help Wikipedia by expanding it. |
See discussion at Wikipedia_talk:WikiProject_Astronomical_objects#nebular_stubs, where after a week, no objections are noted (other than a misunderstanding).
Nebulae are a basic type of astronomical object studied over the centuries.
76.66.193.90 ( talk) 07:18, 3 March 2009 (UTC)
Support both unconditionally. Even if there were only 10 nebulae that would be enough reason to start a category, IMHO. Especially since the number of nebulae will only grow as more of them are discovered and/or receive their Wikipedia article. Debresser ( talk) 12:15, 4 March 2009 (UTC)
Yes I support Dr. Blofeld White cat 16:47, 4 March 2009 (UTC)
The result of the debate was do not create.
I created this before realising I shoudl have done it here. I have noticed that some people are being classed as politicians, where they're more bordering on the line of administration etc. This is my proposed one: {{Usagov}} I know the wording could be a little better - buty I'd work on that if there was general consensus it is okay...
TheUnfortunate (
talk) 10:42, 6 March 2009 (UTC)
Woops, I didn't see those >.< I think that not holding an elected position or whatnot sounds more like that have attempted to rather than just being a receptionist, for example... TheUnfortunate ( talk) 20:13, 6 March 2009 (UTC)
I have? Well it wasn't intentional ;S In this case it was {{V. Larry Teaver, Jr.}} - I'm not sure if he could be classed as a politician due to my lack of knowledge of American politics, but I hope you get where I'm coming from. I called it that as a base until we'd come to a consensus as to whether this could work out - I wouldn't leave it like that. TheUnfortunate ( talk) 23:10, 6 March 2009 (UTC)
The result of the debate was see April.
There are well over 60 stubs that cover relationships between countries.. See
Category:Politics Stubs. This would be {{
poli-ir-stub}}.
Alison9 (
talk) 01:08, 4 April 2009 (UTC)
This page is an archive. Do not edit the contents of this page. Please direct any additional comments to the current main page. |
Please check how many articles qualify for a stub type before proposing it.
If (after approval) you create a stub type, please be sure to add it to the list of stub types. This page will be archived in its entirety once all discussions have been closed; there is no need to move them to another page.
The result of the debate was create.
Propose splitting out the following
Waacstats ( talk) 10:53, 31 March 2009 (UTC)
SUpport as with other major professions templates. Dr. Blofeld White cat 15:01, 2 April 2009 (UTC)
The result of the debate was create.
upmerged templates and two categories should push over 60.
Waacstats (
talk) 20:15, 29 March 2009 (UTC)
The result of the debate was create upmerged Czechoslovakia-stub, proceed with caution.
Former country stub.
CatScan found 67 articles.--
Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus|
talk 17:49, 29 March 2009 (UTC)
I actually think this would be a very much needed template. I would support it. Dr. Blofeld White cat 10:26, 30 March 2009 (UTC)
The result of the debate was create as AustriaHungary-stub.
Former country stub.
CatScan found 156 articles.--
Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus|
talk 17:49, 29 March 2009 (UTC)
The result of the debate was create upmerged template.
Somebody is using insect-stub too much. A potential 1800 articles.
Dr. Blofeld
White cat 17:21, 29 March 2009 (UTC)
The result of the debate was create as revised.
At present we only have {{
Economist-stub}} and American. 550 stubs, should create templates for most of the European countries and Russia and some Asian countries like India etc. It is likely several will be viable for new categories.
Dr. Blofeld
White cat 16:54, 29 March 2009 (UTC)
I was thinking something like the following:
The result of the debate was create Tees Valley school stubs.
Different stubs must be created for
Redcar & Cleveland schools,
Stockton and
Middlesbrough schools.
Technically, these schools aren't in Yorkshire and Humber but confusingly are in Yorkshire.
Perhaps categories should also be made for North Yorkshire schools etc. Computerjoe 's talk 16:01, 29 March 2009 (UTC)
The result of the debate was create.
Another template goes past the 60 mark, speedy category.
Waacstats (
talk) 12:18, 29 March 2009 (UTC)
Support
Dr. Blofeld
White cat 16:54, 29 March 2009 (UTC)
The result of the debate was create already! :P.
Category is approaching 500 and with a bit of attention, most to all of the templates should surpass 60. Propose categories for all over 60.--
TM 23:24, 28 March 2009 (UTC)
UPmerged template has >60 articles. Propose category. Speedy? Waacstats ( talk) 16:31, 27 March 2009 (UTC)
The result of the debate was create.
we have an upmerged template with 60 articles. Speedy?
Waacstats (
talk) 11:31, 27 March 2009 (UTC)
The result of the debate was create NagornoKarabakh-stub & cat; upmerged templates for -geo- and -bio- for now.
{{
Nagorno-Karabakh-stub}}
Articles: virtually all articles in Category:Nagorno-Karabakh. I have found these stubs that are not necessarily within the category. (there are many more, including some within the category)
That was thirty. A few more while I am on it, but I am running out of time:
-- 189.121.183.72 ( talk) 22:14, 24 March 2009 (UTC)
Continuing,
40
(I think listing more from Template:Lachin Rayon is a little cheap, so I will contine without it)
50
60
That was 65. There are hundreds of more geographic and biographical stubs that can be added to this list. Is this good enough?-- 189.121.183.72 ( talk) 20:13, 1 April 2009 (UTC)
The result of the debate was create.
I count over 80 stubs.
Dr. Blofeld
White cat 21:35, 24 March 2009 (UTC)
The result of the debate was create.
Propose {{
Russia-volleyball-bio-stub}} and
Category:Russian volleyball biography stubs. Catscan shows 69 articles.
Waacstats (
talk) 12:19, 24 March 2009 (UTC)
Yep you sports enthuasiast you
Dr. Blofeld
White cat 21:35, 24 March 2009 (UTC)
The result of the debate was create.
uperged template exicts with 60 articles propose cat (Speedy).
Waacstats (
talk) 12:16, 24 March 2009 (UTC)
The result of the debate was do not create; recommend project banner instead.
Parliamentary Procedure Project primary topic. At least 60 stubs sorted.
The result of the debate was create.
The following upmerged tempaltes all have 60+ articles propose speedy cats.
Waacstats ( talk) 13:40, 23 March 2009 (UTC)
Def. Dr. Blofeld White cat 21:34, 24 March 2009 (UTC)
The result of the debate was create.
Propose giving the following categories upmerged by nation templates
note I will come back to Europe/SouthAm/Africa/CentralAm. Waacstats ( talk) 08:50, 23 March 2009 (UTC) Definately Dr. Blofeld White cat 21:34, 24 March 2009 (UTC)
The result of the debate was create.
As with chile so with uruguay the sport-bio and athletics-bio combine for over 60 and we already have a footy cat.
Waacstats (
talk) 14:56, 22 March 2009 (UTC)
The result of the debate was create.
two upmerged templates (-sport- and -athletics-) total over 60 and 1 cat (footy).
Waacstats (
talk) 14:19, 22 March 2009 (UTC)
The result of the debate was create.
I know this has been proposed (and passed) a couple of times but I plan on doing templates for the missing countries (mainly Oceania and Carribean) anyone oppose this.
Waacstats (
talk) 15:11, 18 March 2009 (UTC)
Go for it. I know somebody did the SOlomons a while back. Dr. Blofeld White cat 18:36, 18 March 2009 (UTC)
The result of the debate was moved to sfd.
The result of the debate was create.
I propose the creation of both a
Synapsid stub type {{synapsid-stub}} and one for prehistoric
arthropods, {{paleo-arthropod-stub}}. Both would have more than enough to qualify for creation, but I'm not going to count them because their parent category (paleontology stubs) has over 800 articles in it.
Abyssal (
talk) 10:46, 17 March 2009 (UTC)
Support. Break down of anything over 800 is clearly needed Dr. Blofeld White cat 18:02, 17 March 2009 (UTC)
The result of the debate was create.
{{
Norway-tram-stub}} has surpassed 60 transclusions, and is increasing rapidly.
Arsenikk
(talk) 20:29, 15 March 2009 (UTC)
Support. Dr. Blofeld White cat 11:27, 17 March 2009 (UTC)
The result of the debate was create.
as with europe so with other continents. Propose split by nation templates for each country along the lines of {{
Foo-athletics-bio-stub}}/{{
Foo-sport-bio-stub}}. Templates for any template that gets to 60.
Waacstats (
talk) 19:45, 15 March 2009 (UTC)
Good idea Dr. Blofeld White cat 18:02, 17 March 2009 (UTC)
The result of the debate was create.
Category:Belgian athletics biography stubs will have 60 articles from currently upmerged template.
Category:Moldovan sportspeople stubs will have 50 aticles from currently upmerged templates and 1 subcat.
Propose for speedy.
Waacstats (
talk) 19:45, 15 March 2009 (UTC)
SHould be fine
Dr. Blofeld
White cat 18:02, 17 March 2009 (UTC)
The result of the debate was create.
Create templates for most of the main countries and upmerge until they hit 60, e.g {{
Germany-photographer-stub}}, {{
Spain-photographer-stub}}, {{
Lithuania-architect-stub}} etc.
Dr. Blofeld
White cat 12:46, 15 March 2009 (UTC)
The result of the debate was create.
Upmerged stubs add up to 68--
TM 20:45, 12 March 2009 (UTC)
Miles, we will come to that when we create the templates. Its best if you merge this with my proposal underneath. Speedy for now but we may want to create a few stubs to make a number of other countries viablle too Dr. Blofeld White cat 21:24, 12 March 2009 (UTC)
Oh sorry I was mixing you with T J miles! Dr. Blofeld White cat 12:44, 15 March 2009 (UTC)
The result of the debate was create.
Split of
Category:Asian sports venue stubs, which is above 550.--
TM 21:28, 11 March 2009 (UTC)
The result of the debate was create.
Way over 60!
Dr. Blofeld
White cat 18:36, 11 March 2009 (UTC)
The result of the debate was create.
Now over 85 stubs.
Dr. Blofeld
White cat 14:43, 10 March 2009 (UTC)
The result of the debate was create.
Category:Panamanian sportspeople stubs = 70 stubs. Speedy?--
TM 22:24, 9 March 2009 (UTC)
Speedy
Dr. Blofeld
White cat 10:49, 10 March 2009 (UTC)
The result of the debate was create.
Thought this had been proposed but can't find it, existing template with well over 60 stubs. Speedy?
Waacstats (
talk) 20:22, 6 March 2009 (UTC)
Go for it amigo. Dr. Blofeld White cat 20:15, 8 March 2009 (UTC)
The result of the debate was create as revised.
Propose creating struct templates for every country of Africa and upmerging by region of Africa perhaps?
Dr. Blofeld
White cat
I propose:
That I have, may even see about creating a few new articles too. Dr. Blofeld White cat 11:23, 6 March 2009 (UTC)
The result of the debate was do not create.
To go under
Category:NorthernIreland-stub.
There is currently no section for general Northern Ireland sporting organisations or more specifically for aeromodelling in the Northern Ireland section, so I propose an aeromodelling stub Sean Scully 12.55 5th March 2009 (GMT)
control flying: 11,983 indoor flying: 547 model helicopter flying: 921 rc model flying: 178 model jets 5578 model gliders: 729
Total: 19,936
Now if we apply your mathematics to this it means that with these searches alone we have
30% of 19936 = 6645 stubs, 10% of 6645 = 664 about British Aeromodelling, 15% of 664 = 99.6 stubs that have content relating to or can be linked to a stubb on Northern Ireland Aeromodelling.
If you do a search for model associations you get a return of 19,268 I take it that all of these are also opposed?
Under model flying associations there are 1412, again all of these other associations are now contested? Or is it just Northern Irelands model flying association? Regarding Naming convention the following are listed
Model Aeronautics Association of Canada; British Model Flying Association; Far East Model Car Association; Fourth Association of Model Auto Racing; American Speed Association;
What is the difference in these names and my proposal? That they are Canada, British American? These have all been accepted in the past and are not contested. Is it only large countries who should be listed in Wikipedia? Sean Scully 7th March 2009 23:55 GMT
Surely the very nature of Wikipedia is to allow access to ALL. Northern Ireland throughout a large part of the world is totally unknown apart from the new they see on TV. Aeromodelling is a large organisation in NI and should be allowed its place. bill scott Belfast N.I.
Aeromodelling encourages many educational, social and recreational benefits. Any one who wishes to get involved may use Wikipedia to garner information, particularly if they are interested in model flying in N. Ireland. Small countries should not be discriminated against in this way. Robert McCartney Londonderry N.I.
Wikipedia provides knowledge and a source of information for many people around the world, thats what the world web is all about. When we start saying NO! to various interest groups from small regions like Northern Ireland, such as the NIAA, the official voice of Areomodelling in the region, then I believe its defeats the overall purpose of the world web. John Pearson Armagh N.I.
Northern Ireland geography stubs; Northern Ireland politician stubs; Northern Ireland railway station stubs; Northern Ireland school stubs; Northern Ireland stubs; Northern Irish football biography stubs; Northern Irish football club stubs; Northern Irish people stubs; Northern Irish sportspeople stubs;
Aeromodelling does not fit any of these categories neatly.
We will however take your advice and simply create stubs in the Northern Ireland stubs, then when ample stubs relating to NIAA aeromodelling are created we will again request that a stub type for this be created separately. As such I withdraw at this point in time the request for a a new NIAA stub type. Sean Scully 8th March 2009 23:20 GMT
The result of the debate was create as tradition-stub.
To go under
Category:Folklore.
It is such a huge subject that i am surprised no stub exists for it. You see, {{
mythology-stub}} and {{
culture-stub}} don't quite hit the mark, and a {{
traditions-stub}} also does not exist...so i guess i'm proposing both, then! (the latter to go under
Category:Traditions) I ran into the need for the folklore stub when re-creating the
Baba Marta article, and the traditions stub when expanding
Pizho and Penda, but there are many articles that would benefit from them both. Thank You!
BigSteve (
talk) 23:33, 4 March 2009 (UTC)
Hi, folks, I've created the tradition stub: {{ tradition-stub}} I chose the piñata as the picture as it is a very well-known tradition, and vividly colourful for the tiny thumbnail image. please visit the wiki commons page for the picture as well as the stub page to check if i have done everything correctly (this is my first stub template so am still learning), especially if i have mentioned the correct licence and added all the relevant categories. (I have not yet created the folklore stub as i cannot think of what picture to use...) Thank you in advance! BigSteve ( talk) 13:34, 20 March 2009 (UTC)
ps. I've added the new stub here - correct or not? i am unsure about the parent category being Category:Traditions while the stub is "tradition" (singular) - and then should the stub category be Category:tradition stubs or Category:traditions stubs??? or both, with a redirect in between them? BigSteve ( talk) 14:18, 20 March 2009 (UTC)
The result of the debate was create.
To go under
Category:Astronomy stubs and
Category:Nebulae
This nebula-related article is a stub. You can help Wikipedia by expanding it. |
See discussion at Wikipedia_talk:WikiProject_Astronomical_objects#nebular_stubs, where after a week, no objections are noted (other than a misunderstanding).
Nebulae are a basic type of astronomical object studied over the centuries.
76.66.193.90 ( talk) 07:18, 3 March 2009 (UTC)
Support both unconditionally. Even if there were only 10 nebulae that would be enough reason to start a category, IMHO. Especially since the number of nebulae will only grow as more of them are discovered and/or receive their Wikipedia article. Debresser ( talk) 12:15, 4 March 2009 (UTC)
Yes I support Dr. Blofeld White cat 16:47, 4 March 2009 (UTC)
The result of the debate was do not create.
I created this before realising I shoudl have done it here. I have noticed that some people are being classed as politicians, where they're more bordering on the line of administration etc. This is my proposed one: {{Usagov}} I know the wording could be a little better - buty I'd work on that if there was general consensus it is okay...
TheUnfortunate (
talk) 10:42, 6 March 2009 (UTC)
Woops, I didn't see those >.< I think that not holding an elected position or whatnot sounds more like that have attempted to rather than just being a receptionist, for example... TheUnfortunate ( talk) 20:13, 6 March 2009 (UTC)
I have? Well it wasn't intentional ;S In this case it was {{V. Larry Teaver, Jr.}} - I'm not sure if he could be classed as a politician due to my lack of knowledge of American politics, but I hope you get where I'm coming from. I called it that as a base until we'd come to a consensus as to whether this could work out - I wouldn't leave it like that. TheUnfortunate ( talk) 23:10, 6 March 2009 (UTC)
The result of the debate was see April.
There are well over 60 stubs that cover relationships between countries.. See
Category:Politics Stubs. This would be {{
poli-ir-stub}}.
Alison9 (
talk) 01:08, 4 April 2009 (UTC)