This article went through a WPMILHIST peer review some months ago, and I've implemented virtually all the suggestions made there. It's currently rated B. Looking for either an endorsement of A-class status or pointers on what I need to fix to get it upgraded. Many thanks. Buckshot06 ( talk) 10:13, 13 April 2008 (UTC) reply
Comment I'm a bit confused by this article and am hoping that you can clarify it for me. What is its purpose? Is it a list of Soviet armies or is an explication of what "army" means in Soviet terms? -- ROGER DAVIES talk 17:58, 13 April 2008 (UTC) reply
CommentI also put these on the discussion page. Yes, I agree the purpose is a little unclear, although you do mention that a Soviet (and for that matter Japanese) were smaller than Western ones. In elaborating on that, a worthwhile aside is that Soviet ranks went from colonel to major general.
Might clarify that Guards designation neither changed the organization of the unit, nor was assigned temporarily.
Clarify, if that [what? Buckshot06 ( talk) 23:25, 13 April 2008 (UTC)] is the case, the date of these designations. It's confusing to see a redesignation when an Army was reassigned to GSFG, considering that the later name is more likely to be known. reply
Reflist should be 2-column.
Howard C. Berkowitz (talk) 20:28, 13 April 2008 (UTC)
Comment. I usually go for GA status before the A status, GA reviewers offer some useful input. Lead is way to short and should be expanded.
There are too few inline cites (many paragraphs have no refs).
List of Soviet Armies in the Civil War should have individual armies ilinked, like the following List of Soviet Armies in World War II has (same hold true for other lists - ilink all armies, they were all notable, don't be afraid of red links). Lists of armies of the interwar and postwar series should be added.
PS. While this does not concern this article, {{ Armies of the Soviet Army}} should be added to all subarticles about individual armies.-- Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| talk 21:46, 14 April 2008 (UTC) reply
This article went through a WPMILHIST peer review some months ago, and I've implemented virtually all the suggestions made there. It's currently rated B. Looking for either an endorsement of A-class status or pointers on what I need to fix to get it upgraded. Many thanks. Buckshot06 ( talk) 10:13, 13 April 2008 (UTC) reply
Comment I'm a bit confused by this article and am hoping that you can clarify it for me. What is its purpose? Is it a list of Soviet armies or is an explication of what "army" means in Soviet terms? -- ROGER DAVIES talk 17:58, 13 April 2008 (UTC) reply
CommentI also put these on the discussion page. Yes, I agree the purpose is a little unclear, although you do mention that a Soviet (and for that matter Japanese) were smaller than Western ones. In elaborating on that, a worthwhile aside is that Soviet ranks went from colonel to major general.
Might clarify that Guards designation neither changed the organization of the unit, nor was assigned temporarily.
Clarify, if that [what? Buckshot06 ( talk) 23:25, 13 April 2008 (UTC)] is the case, the date of these designations. It's confusing to see a redesignation when an Army was reassigned to GSFG, considering that the later name is more likely to be known. reply
Reflist should be 2-column.
Howard C. Berkowitz (talk) 20:28, 13 April 2008 (UTC)
Comment. I usually go for GA status before the A status, GA reviewers offer some useful input. Lead is way to short and should be expanded.
There are too few inline cites (many paragraphs have no refs).
List of Soviet Armies in the Civil War should have individual armies ilinked, like the following List of Soviet Armies in World War II has (same hold true for other lists - ilink all armies, they were all notable, don't be afraid of red links). Lists of armies of the interwar and postwar series should be added.
PS. While this does not concern this article, {{ Armies of the Soviet Army}} should be added to all subarticles about individual armies.-- Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| talk 21:46, 14 April 2008 (UTC) reply