Article promoted by Ian Rose ( talk) via MilHistBot ( talk) 07:20, 10 January 2019 (UTC) « Return to A-Class review list
Instructions for nominators and reviewers
Battle of Azaz (1030) ( | talk | history | links | watch | logs)
Toolbox |
---|
The Battle of Azaz is not as well known as the big Arab–Byzantine conflicts of earlier centuries, but is nevertheless a typical specimen of border warfare, and a parade example on the dangers of having an armchair general as commander-in-chief; even though not decisive on any wider scale, it was a major humiliation for the Byzantines and personally for Emperor Romanos III. The article has been written by Al Ameer son and myself, and we both feel it is as complete as it can be. Constantine ✍ 09:40, 25 November 2018 (UTC)
Support: G'day, thanks for your efforts. This looks pretty good to me. I have a few minor comments/suggestions: AustralianRupert ( talk) 11:11, 26 November 2018 (UTC)
What a really interesting and well-written article! I learned loads. Honestly, this is so good that I feel like a freshman astronomy student doing a peer review of a Stephen Hawking paper and feel embarrassed to provide any input at all. In any case, as I was reading this I made a few notes which I've copied below but all of which can basically be ignored since none of them qualify my support for advancement.
Chetsford ( talk) 05:21, 8 December 2018 (UTC)
As Chetsford notes, the sources are all solidly reliable. I am unable to find any other sources which would materially add to the content of the article. The sources referred to seem to support the text cited, insofar as I have checked them. I found no unattributed close paraphrasing. I consider the sources to be current, as these things go. A reasonable mix of perspectives are represented. Everything that I would expect to be cited, is. Gog the Mild ( talk) 15:19, 11 December 2018 (UTC)
Those are only very minor points that barely need addressing, so support. In my view this is a nice, concise article and it clearly meets the criteria. HJ Mitchell | Penny for your thoughts? 19:07, 30 December 2018 (UTC)
Image review all the images are appropriately licensed, PD due to age (13th century). Captions are appropriate. Good to go. Peacemaker67 ( click to talk to me) 04:36, 10 January 2019 (UTC)
Article promoted by Ian Rose ( talk) via MilHistBot ( talk) 07:20, 10 January 2019 (UTC) « Return to A-Class review list
Instructions for nominators and reviewers
Battle of Azaz (1030) ( | talk | history | links | watch | logs)
Toolbox |
---|
The Battle of Azaz is not as well known as the big Arab–Byzantine conflicts of earlier centuries, but is nevertheless a typical specimen of border warfare, and a parade example on the dangers of having an armchair general as commander-in-chief; even though not decisive on any wider scale, it was a major humiliation for the Byzantines and personally for Emperor Romanos III. The article has been written by Al Ameer son and myself, and we both feel it is as complete as it can be. Constantine ✍ 09:40, 25 November 2018 (UTC)
Support: G'day, thanks for your efforts. This looks pretty good to me. I have a few minor comments/suggestions: AustralianRupert ( talk) 11:11, 26 November 2018 (UTC)
What a really interesting and well-written article! I learned loads. Honestly, this is so good that I feel like a freshman astronomy student doing a peer review of a Stephen Hawking paper and feel embarrassed to provide any input at all. In any case, as I was reading this I made a few notes which I've copied below but all of which can basically be ignored since none of them qualify my support for advancement.
Chetsford ( talk) 05:21, 8 December 2018 (UTC)
As Chetsford notes, the sources are all solidly reliable. I am unable to find any other sources which would materially add to the content of the article. The sources referred to seem to support the text cited, insofar as I have checked them. I found no unattributed close paraphrasing. I consider the sources to be current, as these things go. A reasonable mix of perspectives are represented. Everything that I would expect to be cited, is. Gog the Mild ( talk) 15:19, 11 December 2018 (UTC)
Those are only very minor points that barely need addressing, so support. In my view this is a nice, concise article and it clearly meets the criteria. HJ Mitchell | Penny for your thoughts? 19:07, 30 December 2018 (UTC)
Image review all the images are appropriately licensed, PD due to age (13th century). Captions are appropriate. Good to go. Peacemaker67 ( click to talk to me) 04:36, 10 January 2019 (UTC)